Barr disputes key inspector general finding about FBI’s Russia investigation

[Cardinal]

So you KNOW no indictments will come out of the Durham investigation? Are you confident enough in that position to make a friendly wager?

Yes. If I’m wrong, then for one month I’ll make my signature “SLC was right and I was wrong” and link to the bet in this thread. If I’m right then for one month you’ll make your signature “Cardinal was right and I was wrong” and link to the bet in this thread. Game?

 

[SLC]

Yes. If I’m wrong, then for one month I’ll make my signature “SLC was right and I was wrong” and link to the bet in this thread. If I’m right then for one month you’ll make your signature “Cardinal was right and I was wrong” and link to the bet in this thread. Game?

Absolutely extends his right hand for electronic handshake.

 

[Cardinal]

Absolutely extends his right hand for electronic handshake.

Alright, so the expectation is that indictments will come directly out of the Durham investigation. Do we have an expected date for the announcement of this report? It’s December 5, right?

 

[SLC]

Alright, so the expectation is that indictments will come out of the Durham investigation. Do we have an expected date for the announcement of this report? It’s December 5, right?

I have no idea when Durham will issue his report. You are the one the has a mole in his investigation not me.

 

[Cardinal]

I have no idea when Durham will issue his report. You are the one the has a mole in his investigation not me.

An expected date is important so that I don’t declare victory prematurely and so that, conversely, we don’t forget about the bet altogether because we both end up in our 90’s. Specificity is important. Also note my edit, which is that indictments will come directly out of the Durham investigation. Again, specificity is important so that the winner and the loser aren’t ambiguous.

 

[SLC]

An expected date is important so that I don’t declare victory prematurely and so that, conversely, we don’t forget about the bet altogether because we both end up in our 90’s. Specificity is important. Also note my edit, which is that indictments will come directly out of the Durham investigation. Again, specificity is important so that the winner and the loser aren’t ambiguous.

:lol: no crawfishing. The bet you made and the bet I agreed to was any indictment made by the Durham investigation. You aren’t a welsher are you? Don’t be a typical Liberal.

 

[Cardinal]

:lol: no crawfishing. The bet you made and the bet I agreed to was any indictment made by the Durham investigation. You aren’t a welsher are you? Don’t be a typical Liberal.

Okay, then we’ll set the deadline at tomorrow at 8am. If no indictments result from the Durham investigation then I win.

 

[marke]

Since Horowitz has failed to confirm right wing conspiracy theories, Barr is having what is known in the psychiatric profession as a "boo hoo." Sadly for him, the IG operates independently of DOJ leadership, so Barr cannot change the findings.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...64f018-154d-11ea-a659-7d69641c6ff7_story.html

But as has already been noted previously, Barr does have authority over his famed "Durham report," which he can present as (entirely nebulously) supporting right wing conspiracy theories.

Of course democrats are going to keep defending Hillary's Trump/Russian collusion lie supported by lying Obama administration officials.
What choice do they have now? It would be political suicide for them to come clean now after so many years of belligerent lying.

 

[SLC]

Okay, then we’ll set the deadline at tomorrow at 8am. If no indictments result from the Durham investigation then I win.

There you go again trying to crawfish . The bet you agreed to has no artificial time limits. We will have to wait for indictments or a report saying no indictments. There is a criminal investigation going on now I suspect there will be indictments also. Face it you are screwed. :lamo But hey don’t worry you are the one that said you KNOW no indictments will come out of the Durham investigation.

 

[Winston]

Since Horowitz has failed to confirm right wing conspiracy theories, Barr is having what is known in the psychiatric profession as a "boo hoo." Sadly for him, the IG operates independently of DOJ leadership, so Barr cannot change the findings.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...64f018-154d-11ea-a659-7d69641c6ff7_story.html

But as has already been noted previously, Barr does have authority over his famed "Durham report," which he can present as (entirely nebulously) supporting right wing conspiracy theories.

Barr is a well spoken wing nut. I saw recent video of him speaking at a wing nut conference of some sort, where he whined about the left being divisive and he availed himself of other victim playing narratives and buzz words that our perpetual victims on the right indulge in.

 

[Cardinal]

There you go again trying to crawfish . The bet you agreed to has no artificial time limits. We will have to wait for indictments or a report saying no indictments.

I don’t want to die of old age before collecting on my bet. Let’s call it before the end of January. If you don’t accept then we’ll cancel the bet. Keeping it open ended is your way of maintaining artificial hope that the investigation will confirm your conspiracy theories. Accept a date for closure or there’s no bet.

 

[Winston]

Since Horowitz has failed to confirm right wing conspiracy theories, Barr is having what is known in the psychiatric profession as a "boo hoo." Sadly for him, the IG operates independently of DOJ leadership, so Barr cannot change the findings.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...64f018-154d-11ea-a659-7d69641c6ff7_story.html

But as has already been noted previously, Barr does have authority over his famed "Durham report," which he can present as (entirely nebulously) supporting right wing conspiracy theories.

The ironic part about Barr in the Trump age, is that currently conservatives are being victimized by the law. And Barr is the top law enforcement agent in the country, so Barr is being victimized by himself. xD.

 

[Cardinal]

The ironic part about Barr in the Trump age, is that currently conservatives are being victimized by the law. And Barr is the top law enforcement agent in the country, so Barr is being victimized by himself. xD.

Let’s face it: they could hold every conceivable lever of power everywhere and they’d still be victims.

 

[SLC]

I don’t want to die of old age before collecting on my bet. Let’s call it before the end of January. If you don’t accept then we’ll cancel the bet. Keeping it open ended is your way of maintaining artificial hope that the investigation will confirm your conspiracy theories. Accept a date for closure or there’s no bet.

STOP trying to crawfish. I don’t expect Durham to make a report till next summer sometime. But there may be indictments before that. I have hear rumors about grand juries but we shall have to wait and see. You need to be a little patient. I doubt Barr would have started the Durham investigation unless he was pretty sure of criminal activity. The fact that AG Barr disagrees with the IG seems to point to Barr thinks someone broke the law. Don’t be a CRAWFISH :lol:

 

[Cardinal]

STOP trying to crawfish. I don’t expect Durham to make a report till next summer sometime. But there may be indictments before that. I have hear rumors about grand juries but we shall have to wait and see. You need to be a little patient. I doubt Barr would have started the Durham investigation unless he was pretty sure of criminal activity. The fact that AG Barr disagrees with the IG seems to point to Barr thinks someone broke the law. Don’t be a CRAWFISH :lol:

TILL NEXT SUMMER??!!

Forget it, you’re not taking this seriously.

 

[Winston]

Let’s face it: they could hold every conceivable lever of power everywhere and they’d still be victims.

A large part is outside their control. They know deep down the culture is changing. So, despite winning elections and engaging in under handed tricks to anchor power, they know it's futile. That's why the alarm bells are going off. They have no viable avenue to turn back the clock to the 1950's. And even if they did, they would find out that Eisenhower was a Never Trumper deep state liberal in disguise.

 

[Oborosen]

A large part is outside their control. They know deep down the culture is changing. So, despite winning elections and engaging in under handed tricks to anchor power, they know it's futile. That's why the alarm bells are going off. They have no viable avenue to turn back the clock to the 1950's. And even if they did, they would find out that Eisenhower was a Never Trumper deep state liberal in disguise.

Strange, we don't see the republicans wanting to turn the clock back, and it's not them who're resulting to under handed tricks...

That would have to be the democrats.

 

[Winston]

STOP trying to crawfish. I don’t expect Durham to make a report till next summer sometime. But there may be indictments before that. I have hear rumors about grand juries but we shall have to wait and see. You need to be a little patient. I doubt Barr would have started the Durham investigation unless he was pretty sure of criminal activity. The fact that AG Barr disagrees with the IG seems to point to Barr thinks someone broke the law. Don’t be a CRAWFISH :lol:

Barr is a political operative. If Barr wanted to enforce the law Trump would be behind bars right now.

 

[Winston]

Strange, we don't see the republicans wanting to turn the clock back, and it's not them who're resulting to under handed tricks...

That would have to be the democrats.

I have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[SLC]

TILL NEXT SUMMER??!!

Forget it, you’re not taking this seriously.

Forget it...no way :lol: You are just scared you will lose and want to crawfish on a legit bet. Eat your veggies exercise a little stay healthy you can make till Durham indicts someone or puts out a report that lets everyone off the hook. You had better hope those rumors of a grand jury are just rumors. :lol: I'm keeping you to your word.

 

[SLC]

Barr is a political operative. If Barr wanted to enforce the law Trump would be behind bars right now.

No you are confused Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch were political operatives Barr is following the law. Talking to Clinton about grand kids...sure :roll:

 

[Winston]

No you are confused Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch were political operatives Barr is following the law. Talking to Clinton about grand kids...sure :roll:

So, you do concede that Attorney Generals can have political motivations. Where your argument fails is standard run of the mill partisanship. The other side is bad and does naughty things but my side doesn't. Pretty simplistic thinking.

 

[SLC]

So, you do concede that Attorney Generals can have political motivations. Where your argument fails is standard run of the mill partisanship. The other side is bad and does naughty things but my side doesn't. Pretty simplistic thinking.

That is exactly what I think about you. :lol:

 

[Winston]

That is exactly what I think about you. :lol:

I'm not a Democrat. So, go ahead with Eric Holder. I'm sure he let politics bleed into his work and coordinated with the WH too. What of it? They are out of power now and there are some new characters in town.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Oborosen]

Since Horowitz has failed to confirm right wing conspiracy theories, Barr is having what is known in the psychiatric profession as a "boo hoo." Sadly for him, the IG operates independently of DOJ leadership, so Barr cannot change the findings.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...64f018-154d-11ea-a659-7d69641c6ff7_story.html

But as has already been noted previously, Barr does have authority over his famed "Durham report," which he can present as (entirely nebulously) supporting right wing conspiracy theories.

"According to people familiar with the matter"... also known as, we're almost lying out our asses.

I'm getting so tired of this continual flow of assumptions.