• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bari Weiss happy to ‘debate’ FBI over accusation that 'Twitter Files' are 'misinformation'

there is documentation, and every reason to believe the Emails are genuine.
I cant recall but the NYTimes verified the laptop was real as well

Bobulinsky has repeatedly offered to sit for any interviews by the FBI -the FBI wont do any interview/investigation
(not to be confused with the DE AG investigtion)
The communications that right wingers are excited about have not been verified (and don't even suggest crimes anyway).
 
We already have corroboration on it.
That Hunter is a coke fiend? Yes, I know.

You can read anything you want into anything else. Free country. "10% for the Big Guy" is meaningless.

Even if the Big Guy is Joe Biden, so what? What laws were broken by taking a 10% cut of whatever it is you think happened?

Was Biden a private citizen at the time? That's an important piece of information. Do you have it?

Was Biden Vice-President at the time? The Vice-President has no power to enter into a quid-pro-quo, so that's out. Influence over Obama? Over the Senate? Who? And what?

If you can't answer these questions, "10% for the Big Guy" could be the incoherent ramblings of a coke fiend, like I said.
 
This is what they did-- and what they were doing on a regular basis.
How else do they draw a conclusion that the laptop content that the NY POST was about to release was promptly Russian disinformation? And tell that to TWITTER et. Al.
Really?

JMJ, he cites the nypost... ignores Mac Isaac... ignores Rudy and his Russian taint of "the evidence".

https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-8853123 › U...
Oct 18, 2020 — "Andrii Derkach posted to Facebook on Friday to say there is a 'second laptop' involving evidence of corruption and connected to the Bidens, ..."

Andrii Derkach - Wikipedia

... ig
en.wikipedia.org
"...
In August 2020, U.S. counterintelligence chief William Evanina identified Derkach as a key participant in Russian efforts to harm Joe Biden's candidacy in the 2020 election. U.S. IC analysis released in March 2021 found that Derkach was among proxies of Russian intelligence who promoted and laundered misleading or unsubstantiated narratives about Biden "to , ..including some close to former President Trump and his administration." ..Rudy Giuliani met with Derkach in December 2019.

Both Andrii and Leonid Derkach are very close to ...in the Russian, Ukrainian, and Israeli mafia.."

-snip-

Hint! RT and Murdoch Media and Musk are not your friends...

https://www.rt.com › op-ed › 501622-hunter-biden-trump-media

Hunter Biden's conflict of interest silenced by 'fake

mainstream media’, but Trump’s own people are in on cover-up​

... - RT

24 Sep, 2020 19:27
First there was William Evanina, the ODNI official appointed to oversee all election intelligence briefings by acting DNI Richard Grenell, Trump's trusted envoy. Evanina told Congress in August that "Russia is using a range of measures to primarily denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russia 'establishment.'"`

Author of the RT article above, tweeting one month later,



Back again, four months ago,



Earlier disinfo,

 
Last edited:
:ROFLMAO:

You: "Hey, Slyfox, you said this thing, can you support it?"
Me: "Sure, Slyfox always can deliver the goods. Here's a couple sources."
You: "That doesn't count!"

Just predictably tired avoidance of truth. By the way, the Techdirt article had nothing to do with the NY Times. Do you dispute the mischaracterizations Weiss made which were addressed by the Techdirt article?

Still pushing the lies, huh? Do you still run away every time someone exposes the lies you're posting about this? Because you were pretty consistent about that before.
You claimed she lied. I asked you what lies and you posted some nonsense hit piece as your only support. Here’s one clue for you; a difference in opinion doesn’t mean one person lied. But since you think Bari Weiss is center right (lol), you probably think that counts as a lie.
 
No. Not Twitter violating anyone civil rights.
The government violating Trump's civil rights.
Apparently there are folks claiming some sort of conspiracy between the government and twitter and you linked to a piece titled "is social media censorship a crime" which delved into the issue of civil rights.

You cannot spend millions of keystrokes supporting the notion that twitter and the government are acting as a conspiracy or in collusion or that the goqemernnt is coercing twitter in some way and then try to detach twitter from the government when it suits you. Either they are both violating civil rights or neither are violating civil rights. For the record, neither is violating civil rights. Twitter under Dorsey was curating the public comments of politicians on their platform. Sorry politicians....it's twitter's platform. It does not belong to any group or single politician. They can curate/censor you any way they want to. They can do it unilaterally or with the advice of entities outside the company.

That said, IMO Musk should be a bit more circumspect about the rationalizations he has been using for suspending accounts and curating posts. But regardless of my opinion, he does not have to be more circumspect. Its his platform now.
 
you everr wonder why the "premiere law enforcement agency" (FBI) ;)never did any follow up interviews with Tony Bobulinsky?
He could verify qujte a bit of the Emails

Because he is an idiot and a liar who sat on this "big revelation" for years.....
 
.
you everr wonder why the "premiere law enforcement agency" (FBI) never did any follow up interviews with Tony Bobulinsky?
He could verify qujte a bit of the Emails

Abrams: We invited Hunter Biden's ex-partner to appear

https://www.newsnationnow.com › danabramslive › abr...
Oct 11, 2022 — Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, ... Dan Abrams asked him to come on the show and agreed to his terms, ...

U.S. RWEs are Putin's useful idiots. Bobulinski is a grifter who "premiered" with a Trump campaign stunt the same week he was hit with
a $600,000 judgment.




Link to Archived page of link in tweet above,

China Branding Group Ltd. v. Tony Bobulinski: Complaint​

Complaint for Recognition of a Cayman Islands Money Judgment in China Branding Group Limited (in Official Liquidation), of the Cayman Islands, by and through its Joint Official Liquidators, Hugh Dickson, of the Cayman Islands, and David Bennett, of Hong Kong, both of Grant Thornton v. `at the U. S. District Court for the Central District of California.


file_pdf.png
DOCUMENT.PDF
File Size: 5.27 MB


 
Last edited:
taken in comtext as Hunter and Bidens brother were specifically listed and Bobulinsky claims Hunter routinely called Joe the "chairman"

But this is why a criminal investigation is needed, and not happening
So how many. I think you’d need eight to beat benghazi, right?

I wandered the stinky right web reading about this episode.

A lot of noise and thunder, signifying nothing. Lots of rote repetition, but that’s how all your “facts” become facts to you.
 
He was being impeached because it was thought asking about this kind of stuff was a threat to democracy.
So he can’t multi-task? And he wasn’t impeached over the laptop. He was impeached for trying to extort a foreign leader, though. And again for the Big Lie and it’s consequences.
 
The new FBI... they are allowed to push disinformation and if you complain they probably will put you on some terrorism list.

See how that works!

Nobody sane expects the FBI to debate with them. Time they started teaching Trumpers some life lessons
 
I would pay more attention if the emails etc weren't taken out of context and then couched by the "journalist" in a very specific way to fit the narrative Musk wants to present. I've pretty much given up trying to have a conversation about them because some posters here are so dug in they just don't listen to any other explanation. Not unlike the Hunter laptop conspiracy narrative .......
"Journalist" Matt Taibi said at the outset of the Twitter files release that he had to agree to certain "terms" which he never detailed. Apparently the terms were that he would release nothing damaging about trump or Republicans.
 
the FBI tweets accused Weiss et all that simply relasing Twiters internal documents is "misinformation"
Weiss' open challenge to the FBI came after the agency framed the "Twitter Files" as the work of "conspiracy theorists."

"It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency," the FBI wrote in a statement to Fox News.

Left-wing politicians and media personalities have attempted to discredit the "Twitter Files" and the journalists who released the information online. Weiss has said the only condition of working with Musk was that they first had to release their findings on Twitter. Though Weiss and Taibbi have liberal backgrounds, outlets like the Washington Post and MSNBC have labeled them "conservative" or "right-leaning" in an apparent effort to impugn their integrity.

"The misleading ‘Twitter Files’ cherry picks examples. But anecdotes do not constitute data," Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California, tweeted on Dec. 17.
Has anyone told Weiss that the FBI doesn't debate?
 
"Journalist" Matt Taibi said at the outset of the Twitter files release that he had to agree to certain "terms" which he never detailed. Apparently the terms were that he would release nothing damaging about trump or Republicans.
Taibi has always been a whore.
 
You claimed she lied.
She has. Many times.
I asked you what lies and you posted some nonsense hit piece as your only support.
No, I posted multiple sources which shows "the lies/misrepresentations she has told".

Here’s one clue for you; a difference in opinion doesn’t mean one person lied.
Here's a clue for you...you should try reading the articles you request. Then you'd have the information you pretend to seek. But since you were only pretending to begin with, it makes sense that you wouldn't read either one.
But since you think Bari Weiss is center right (lol), you probably think that counts as a lie.
It's obvious you are not here to debate in good faith. Because you refuse to address the second source at all, even when specifically asked to do so. I'll do it again, that way I can watch you contort around it yet again: By the way, the Techdirt article had nothing to do with the NY Times. Do you dispute the mischaracterizations Weiss made which were addressed by the Techdirt article?
 
the FBI tweets accused Weiss et all that simply relasing Twiters internal documents is "misinformation"
Weiss' open challenge to the FBI came after the agency framed the "Twitter Files" as the work of "conspiracy theorists."

"It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency," the FBI wrote in a statement to Fox News.

Left-wing politicians and media personalities have attempted to discredit the "Twitter Files" and the journalists who released the information online. Weiss has said the only condition of working with Musk was that they first had to release their findings on Twitter. Though Weiss and Taibbi have liberal backgrounds, outlets like the Washington Post and MSNBC have labeled them "conservative" or "right-leaning" in an apparent effort to impugn their integrity.

"The misleading ‘Twitter Files’ cherry picks examples. But anecdotes do not constitute data," Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California, tweeted on Dec. 17.
I would love to see that in real time.

Bari Weiss is why I can’t scream “but faux news” and dismiss out of hand…

Been reading her for a long time, she’s a great writer and (imo) tries to - really- be *fair* in her presentations. She most definitely didn’t wake up one day and throw a career away to troll…

Good for her
 
She has. Many times.

No, I posted multiple sources which shows "the lies/misrepresentations she has told".


Here's a clue for you...you should try reading the articles you request. Then you'd have the information you pretend to seek. But since you were only pretending to begin with, it makes sense that you wouldn't read either one.

It's obvious you are not here to debate in good faith. Because you refuse to address the second source at all, even when specifically asked to do so. I'll do it again, that way I can watch you contort around it yet again: By the way, the Techdirt article had nothing to do with the NY Times. Do you dispute the mischaracterizations Weiss made which were addressed by the Techdirt article?
I asked you to back up your claim in good faith. You failed by posting a hack opinion piece. If you’re so certain she lied you could have cited some things she lied about, but you were unable to do even that.
 
So two non government entities and the fbi under trump.

Seems your ire is misplaced.

No, not at all.....it actually makes it worse, for Biden and the DNC has the corrupt connections in which they can do this under a Republican President without his knowledge speaks volumes to the deep corruption of the Democrat party......deny, deny, deny you woke .........
 
No, not at all.....it actually makes it worse, for Biden and the DNC has the corrupt connections in which they can do this under a Republican President without his knowledge speaks volumes to the deep corruption of the Democrat party......deny, deny, deny you woke .........

 
I would love to see that in real time.

Bari Weiss is why I can’t scream “but faux news” and dismiss out of hand…

Been reading her for a long time, she’s a great writer and (imo) tries to - really- be *fair* in her presentations. She most definitely didn’t wake up one day and throw a career away to troll…

Good for her


"Now onto Bari Weiss who has successfully greased her source — Elon Musk — into giving her access to Twitter. Not bad, not bad. I was told that Weiss was introduced to Musk by David Sacks.

Weiss has had a long, long history of oversexing her stories — and ignoring the obvious conflicts of interests that her publishing of family members and friends presented. This was very trading par excellence. Few stories were fact checked and though I did my best to try to catch some of the errors, quite a few sneaked by. She loved hobnobbing with the very rich or very Jewish/Israeli or both.

The lack of fact checking was once again on display when former New York Times reporter Nicole Perlroth tweeted this:"




 
Last edited:
No, not at all.....it actually makes it worse, for Biden and the DNC has the corrupt connections in which they can do this under a Republican President without his knowledge speaks volumes to the deep corruption of the Democrat party......deny, deny, deny you woke .........








 
Last edited:
Really?



Hint! RT and Murdoch Media and Musk are not your friends...

https://www.rt.com › op-ed › 501622-hunter-biden-trump-media

Hunter Biden's conflict of interest silenced by 'fake

mainstream media’, but Trump’s own people are in on cover-up​

... - RT

24 Sep, 2020 19:27
First there was William Evanina, the ODNI official appointed to oversee all election intelligence briefings by acting DNI Richard Grenell, Trump's trusted envoy. Evanina told Congress in August that "Russia is using a range of measures to primarily denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russia 'establishment.'"`

Author of the RT article above, tweeting one month later,



Back again, four months ago,



Earlier disinfo,



There is no doubt that Russia seeks to influence American election.
But that isn't the issue.

Since 2016, the FBI et. al, have ramped up their monitoring of social media, and as we now see from the 2020 election, the FBI is getting directly involved in an American election. Based upon its own standards, it was a failure--baseless warnings that the NY POST was being fooled by a Russian intelligence operation-- which resulted in social media companies censoring speech.
That is a problem.

And it is all done on the theory that Russian activities threaten American democracy, as per the events of 2016.
 
Back
Top Bottom