Bari Weiss happy to ‘debate’ FBI over accusation that 'Twitter Files' are 'misinformation'

[What if...?]

No, not at all.....it actually makes it worse, for Biden and the DNC has the corrupt connections in which they can do this under a Republican President without his knowledge speaks volumes to the deep corruption of the Democrat party......deny, deny, deny you woke .........

Yup.

Yer screwed. They’re under your bed!

Run!

 

[What if...?]

There is no doubt that Russia seeks to influence American election.
But that isn't the issue.

Since 2016, the FBI et. al, have ramped up their monitoring of social media, and as we now see from the 2020 election, the FBI is getting directly involved in an American election. Based upon its own standards, it was a failure--baseless warnings that the NY POST was being fooled by a Russian intelligence operation-- which resulted in social media companies censoring speech.
That is a problem.

And it is all done on the theory that Russian activities threaten American democracy, as per the events of 2016.

So how, exactly, does a politician’s ****up kid’s laptop affect an election?

Were you just hoping for the smear to work? The old “throw shit against the wall and hope something sticks” routine? Followed by multiple investigations that yield nothing, requiring further investigations, every failure further proof of the conspiracy?

This song is old and stale.

But keep going. It’s funny as hell!

 

[Linuxcooldude]

No. Not Twitter violating anyone civil rights.
The government violating Trump's civil rights.

If removing posts/suspending accounts violates Trumps rights, doing so also for the users who posts it.

 

[Slyfox696]

I asked you to back up your claim in good faith.

I did. Twice. You chose not to read the facts in the articles I cited.

If you’re so certain she lied you could have cited some things she lied about

The article I provided did so. The fact you refuse to acknowledge that shows I made the correct decision in not wasting my time with more effort. Oh, and what did I say in my last post?

It's obvious you are not here to debate in good faith. Because you refuse to address the second source at all, even when specifically asked to do so. I'll do it again, that way I can watch you contort around it yet again: By the way, the Techdirt article had nothing to do with the NY Times. Do you dispute the mischaracterizations Weiss made which were addressed by the Techdirt article?


You don't even try to hide the dishonesty in the post.

 

[Gateman_Wen]

Which will one day be more appropriately and accurately known as "The Taibbi BULLSHIT"

I doubt anyone will remember them very long by any name. Just another turn in the sea of shit that is the american right wing.

 

[Moon]

I did. Twice. You chose not to read the facts in the articles I cited.

The article I provided did so. The fact you refuse to acknowledge that shows I made the correct decision in not wasting my time with more effort. Oh, and what did I say in my last post?

It's obvious you are not here to debate in good faith. Because you refuse to address the second source at all, even when specifically asked to do so. I'll do it again, that way I can watch you contort around it yet again: By the way, the Techdirt article had nothing to do with the NY Times. Do you dispute the mischaracterizations Weiss made which were addressed by the Techdirt article?


You don't even try to hide the dishonesty in the post.

You lazily post two links to show where Weiss lied and I doubt you even read either one. You couldn’t even be bothered to post any excerpts to support your point. You failed. The dishonest one here is you and in typical fashion you’re trying to blame someone else for your embarrassing failure.

 

[Athanasius68]

So how, exactly, does a politician’s ****up kid’s laptop affect an election?

Perhaps the same way the work of a few content farmers and some hack and releasers supposedly impacts an election.

Were you just hoping for the smear to work? The old “throw shit against the wall and hope something sticks” routine? Followed by multiple investigations that yield nothing, requiring further investigations, every failure further proof of the conspiracy?

This song is old and stale.

But keep going. It’s funny as hell!

 

[Slyfox696]

You lazily post two links to show where Weiss lied

It wasn't "lazily"...it was what you asked for.

and I doubt you even read either one.

I have. But you clearly have not. Or you are posting lies about them, either way.

You couldn’t even be bothered to post any excerpts to support your point.

And you prove me intelligent for that with every post you make. You obviously haven't read the links, nor the examples cited within, which shows you were never interested in honest discussion. Which is what I was assuming from the beginning.

You asked for evidence and you've been provided evidence. Which means all you have left to do is post lies about the evidence. Because this was never about honest discussion for you, it was about pushing an agenda.

You failed.

You asked for examples and I gave them to you.

The dishonest one here is you and in typical fashion you’re trying to blame someone else for your embarrassing failure.

Has she or has she not said these two things?

“New York Times employees publicly smear me as a liar and a bigot on Twitter with no fear that harassing me will be met with appropriate action,” she says. She is literally asking the Times to prevent people at the paper from criticizing her, on the grounds that she dislikes the criticism, and thinks it is wrong. That doesn’t sound like free speech.

"After I resigned from The New York Times over the summer for their hostility to free speech and open inquiry,"

Source: https://www.deseret.com/indepth/202...ancel-culture-free-speech-democrat-republican


In other words, has Bari Weiss not, repeatedly, said she believes in "free speech" but constantly whined that other people have exercised their free speech about her? Yes or no? Bari Weiss is a liar every time she claims to believe in free speech, which is what the "general" article was about. Bari Weiss does not believe in free speech, she believes in HER ability to speak freely, but no one else's. She's a liar who constantly lies/misrepresents, as she did in her TwitterFiles about James Baker, which you would know had you actually read either article you requested.

The only question is why you are resorting to posting lies to defend this liar. What's your motive, if not just naked partisanship?

 

[What if...?]

Perhaps the same way the work of a few content farmers and some hack and releasers supposedly impacts an election.

Trumpco had the laptop. For quite a while.

If there was any there there we’d
****ing know. But it’s salacious and gives MAGA boners from all the dick picks and hos and dope. Throw in a couple of tenuous links you amplify to proof positive absent corroborating evidence and BAM, maybe that can get trump re-elected.

That’s what all the hubbub is about. Y’all didn’t get to smear Biden with his kid. You wanted to rub all the stray crack and stripper glitter all over Joe. That’s it.

You can see the laptop too. But you haven’t provided any smoking guns.

Just videos of a stripper smoking a cigarette with her snatch.

This is your grand conspiracy.