• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Avenatti: Surefire and Jacob Wohl Watch out (1 Viewer)

calamity

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,846
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
Superfly said:
Oh fuuuuuuuuudge.

Avenatti is a bulldog. If what he says is true, things are going to go very badly for Wohl.
Click to expand...

Wohl is already hip deep in the brown stuff for what he tried to do regarding Mueller. In for a penny in for a pound, I guess. Or, perhaps, better said would be once your boots are covered in pig ****, you may as well jump into the sty.
 
calamity said:
Avenatti Appears To Blame Jacob Wohl For Domestic Abuse Charge




If this is truly how it played, Jacob is going to be doing some serious time. What an idiot.
Click to expand...

Is Jacob Wohl that disgusting little investment fraud who has his nose embedded between Trump's large ass cheeks, who writes for that lying Gateway Pundit site, and who is banned for life from futures trading because he defrauded investors, and who made up some **** lying story about Robert Mueller assaulting some woman?
 
tres borrachos said:
Is Jacob Wohl that disgusting little investment fraud who has his nose embedded between Trump's large ass cheeks, who writes for that lying Gateway Pundit site, and who is banned for life from futures trading because he defrauded investors, and who made up some **** lying story about Robert Mueller assaulting some woman?
Click to expand...

One and the same.
 
I expect a trickster to emerge, maybe someone other than Jacob Wohl, who then pays a price for a scheme that backfired.

I also expect by this time next week the public knows the identity of the alleged victim.
 
Nothing says "I'm not a violent male" like threatening to "come after" someone. Nah, no anger management problems here!
 
Trippy Trekker said:
I expect a trickster to emerge, maybe someone other than Jacob Wohl, who then pays a price for a scheme that backfired.

I also expect by this time next week the public knows the identity of the alleged victim.
Click to expand...

Newsflash to liberals: The trickster is the porn lawyer.
 
Bucky said:
Newsflash to liberals: The trickster is the porn lawyer.
Click to expand...

Isn't he already under investigation for presenting false evidence regarding Kavanaugh?
 
calamity said:
Wohl is already hip deep in the brown stuff for what he tried to do regarding Mueller. In for a penny in for a pound, I guess. Or, perhaps, better said would be once your boots are covered in pig ****, you may as well jump into the sty.
Click to expand...

Somebody needs to tell this kid to just stop. :lol: I'd like to think he has parents who are warning him away from what he is doing, but apparently, they are encouraging it. Maybe they don't like him, either. :lol: Maybe they want him in the federal pen.
 
so this liberal beats a woman and the dems are more concerned with protecting him than getting justice.

sad
 
Oh look, now it's time for all the people who automatically called Ford a hoaxing liar to make a big show of righteous indignation about alleged violence against women.

Totally believable. Uhuh.
 
Mr Person said:
Oh look, now it's time for all the people who automatically called Ford a hoaxing liar to make a big show of righteous indignation about alleged violence against women.

Totally believable. Uhuh.
Click to expand...

I don't know if Ford was a total hoax or a figment of her imagination, but to put a fine point on the difference in these 2 cases, Avenatti's accuser reported the alleged assault contemporaneously, to the proper authorities. Right there she gets more credibility than Ford.
 
biglawnmower said:
so this liberal beats a woman and the dems are more concerned with protecting him than getting justice.

sad
Click to expand...

lol...I'm already confident enough to bet that the beating was done by someone other than Avenatti, and the "victim" was well paid for the experience. I wish her luck as this moves forward. She'll need it.
 
Acadia said:
I don't know if Ford was a total hoax or a figment of her imagination, but to put a fine point on the difference in these 2 cases, Avenatti's accuser reported the alleged assault contemporaneously, to the proper authorities. Right there she gets more credibility than Ford.
Click to expand...

Did an actual victim come forward? Yesterday they were saying it was an ex-wife. That story changed when both of Avenatti's ex-wives said, "It wasn't me." :roll:
 
calamity said:
Did an actual victim come forward? Yesterday they were saying it was an ex-wife. That story changed when both of Avenatti's ex-wives said, "It wasn't me." :roll:
Click to expand...

I'm not aware of anyone coming forward, but I am certain that "a" woman reported this alleged assault to the police.
 
Acadia said:
I'm not aware of anyone coming forward, but I am certain that "a" woman reported this alleged assault to the police.
Click to expand...

That would seem logical. I don't think just anyone can walk into a cop shop and say, "That man beat a woman." So, let's assume that somewhere out there is an accuser, one who is female. Let's also assume she had visible injuries. Now the question is. Who and what happened?

I can say this. The whole thing fails to pass the smell test. Avenatti knows he is under a microscope. No one can be that stupid. But, I can see him walking right into a trap. And, we already know that the Right has tried to buy fake victims of assault to come out against Mueller. So, it only makes sense that they would try the same ploy against the porn star's lawyer.
 
calamity said:
That would seem logical. I don't think just anyone can walk into a cop shop and say, "That man beat a woman." So, let's assume that somewhere out there is an accuser, one who is female. Let's also assume she had visible injuries. Now the question is. Who and what happened?

I can say this. The whole thing fails to pass the smell test. Avenatti knows he is under a microscope. No one can be that stupid. But, I can see him walking right into a trap. And, we already know that the Right has tried to buy fake victims of assault to come out against Mueller. So, it only makes sense that they would try the same ploy against the porn star's lawyer.
Click to expand...

Well, after witnessing what happened to Kavanaugh, I wouldn't rule anything out.
 
Acadia said:
I don't know if Ford was a total hoax or a figment of her imagination, but to put a fine point on the difference in these 2 cases, Avenatti's accuser reported the alleged assault contemporaneously, to the proper authorities. Right there she gets more credibility than Ford.
Click to expand...

The question isn't whether she had the right person or not, it was rather what standard of proof one demands before giving someone one of the top jobs in the country.

"Transference" is a thing that happens between therapists and patients, and isn't what Kavanaugh-defenders used it as. The idea that she was some liar recruited for a hoax is idiotic. There's no suggestion of that. There's also no suggestion that she has a history of bull*****ing, unlike that Swetnick person (whom I didn't pay attention to). She seemed to be telling the truth. The question was whether someone is willing to take the word of an accuser, not supported by even a complaint witness (that being a person who testifies that they were told of a sexual offense against the victim), but only supported by general stuff like the possibility that such a party happened, etc.

Of course, I didn't need any of that. That Kavanaugh decided to lie about his drinking habits was enough: someone who lies about that - which it wouldn't hurt to admit, seeing as all he had to say was "ok, I drank a lot as a kid. I was young. Now I've grown up" - is not trustworthy......at least not trustworthy enough to put on the highest court. But that's done and over with.




But then, that's getting into the evidence and my reasons for not liking K-man. The ardent Kavanaugh supporters didn't get into the evidence with regard to Avenetti. They began by accusing her of being a hoaxer and then took talking points from RW media, then slotted them into something that was supposed to be an argument for why she was unbelievable. Yet because they started - HERE - from the assumption that she was a hoaxer, it was painfully obvious their 'argument' was not a position resulting from objective analysis.

I have seen some of those same people now assume that Avenetti's accuser is telling the truth, then use that assumption to attack "liberals". it's particularly curious since the alleged victim of Avenetti says the allegations are a lie:

https://twitter.com/DianneG/status/1062860189274198016

https://twitter.com/passantino/status/1062856614657515520
 
She "seemed to be telling the truth". Well hellz bellz, let's ruin Kav's life because she seemed to be telling the truth. OMG.

Ford LIED about her front door. She LIED about flying in airplanes. She LIED about not being able to be in a home without 2 exits. She or her legal representation LIED about not telling her that the committee was bending over backwards to please her and offered to come to her, wherever she was most comfortable. She LIED about not being familiar with the lie detector test. She LIED about what she told her therapist.
 
calamity said:
lol...I'm already confident enough to bet that the beating was done by someone other than Avenatti, and the "victim" was well paid for the experience. I wish her luck as this moves forward. She'll need it.
Click to expand...

*moves your post to "conspiracy" section*

lol (laugh out loud!)
 
calamity said:
lol...I'm already confident enough to bet that the beating was done by someone other than Avenatti, and the "victim" was well paid for the experience. I wish her luck as this moves forward. She'll need it.
Click to expand...

This isn't the Conspiracy Theory forum.
 
calamity said:
I can say this. The whole thing fails to pass the smell test. Avenatti knows he is under a microscope. No one can be that stupid.
Click to expand...

:lol:

All i can say is: Swetnick

She had a history of lying. At least 2 people have come out and said it. Then came the change of story on TV. Avenatti did not do his homework on her.
 
Acadia said:
I don't know if Ford was a total hoax or a figment of her imagination, but to put a fine point on the difference in these 2 cases, Avenatti's accuser reported the alleged assault contemporaneously, to the proper authorities. Right there she gets more credibility than Ford.
Click to expand...

Anyone has more credibility than Ford, for she has none. I'll give Avenatti the presumption of innocence which is more than he gave Kavanaugh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom