- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 5,729
- Reaction score
- 2,853
- Location
- Colorado mountains
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Can it shrubnose.
Your position was shown to be incorrect as all shots came from the front.
And since your position can shown to be wrong, yours is what they wont be interested in.
No Jerry.
This is exactly the kind of thread that should be made as the evidence becomes available.
What you are saying is akin to saying that no thread should be started until all the evidence is in, and that is just ridiculous.
Hey folks no Lois Lerner threads until all the evidence is in. :doh
Hey folks, no IRS threads about them targeting Conservative groups until all the evidence is in. :doh
No Jerry, it is exactly the type of thread that should be made to announce evidence as it becomes available.
Wrong.No thread should be started until all evidence is in. On any topic. Ever. Only with ALL the evidence can we determin if it was a good shot or a crime. Only then is a public discussion of any real value.
To do otherwise is to gossip, and gossip is for small minds.
That wasn't what we were discussing.My position is that this case will be decided in court, using all of the evidence that is available at the time that it goes to trial.
Exactly what is your problem with that?
That wasn't what we were discussing.
No thread should be started until all evidence is in. On any topic. Ever. Only with ALL the evidence can we determin if it was a good shot or a crime. Only then is a public discussion of any real value.
To do otherwise is to gossip, and gossip is for small minds.
If you continue on past that point folks, you hear exactly what Buck Ewer seems to be trying to hide.No you are wrong my top hatted feline friend.
See the autopsy press conference video from 12:40 to 14:00 where it is plainly explained that the grazing wound on the forearm COULD have been received while Brown was running AWAY from the shooter, consistent with the four eye-witness accounts.
Wrong. You have four liars and a lack of understanding of what Dr. Baden has said.Four Eye-witness accounts AND autopsy findings AND the audio tape timing of the shots all line up with each other.
Said an opinionated one. :dohYou have my permission to discuss whatever you want to discuss from now until the end of time, but it won't have any effect on this case, which will be decided in court, where your opinion won't matter.
Said an opinionated one. :doh
The evidence is pretty clear, which should indicate what the GJ should find.
You don't want to discuss that? That's fine. You don't have to.
Nor has what you said addressed what you quoted. Figures. Way to deflect.
And btw, no one here needs your permission.
Baden was answering a question about all the other wounds when he said all were consistent with them coming from the front. He agreed with Pacell that the forearm graze wound could be consistent with a wound from behind if Brown's arm was at his side.If you continue on past that point folks, you hear exactly what Buck Ewer seems to be trying to hide.
Dr. Baden was asked a question about a the wounds being inconsistent with running from the Officer, Baden clearly stated that they were from the front and that they are consistent with moving forwards or backwards, not running away from.
Here is a better video than the one he provided.
Start @ the 20:00 min mark.
Wrong. You have four liars and a lack of understanding of what Dr. Baden has said.
`This is exactly the kind of thread people shouldn't make until ALL the evidence is publicly available.
Attorney: New audio reveals pause in gunfire when Michael Brown was shot
By Holly Yan, CNNLawyer: Audio shows 11 shots when Michael Brown killed - CNN.com
updated 12:36 AM EDT, Tue August 26, 2014
[...]
In the recording, a quick series of shots can be heard, followed by a pause and then another quick succession of shots.
"I personally heard at least 11" shots, the man's attorney, Lopa Blumenthal, told CNN's Don Lemon.
The man, who asked that his identity not be revealed, lives near the site of the shooting and was close enough to have heard the gunshots, Blumenthal said.
He was speaking to a friend on a video chat service and happened to be recording the conversation at the same time Brown was shot, Blumenthal said.
[...]
11 Shots in 5 seconds.
Short pause between 6 and the other five. Likely Brown was still coming at him.
Just more evidence.
Or just as likely that he was lying on the ground with blood seeping out of multiple bullet wounds, eh?
How can anyone really know if they weren't an eyewitness?
"CNN cannot independently verify authenticity of the recording and is awaiting confirmation from the FBI."
'nuff said. I'll wait until it's actually validated.
Read my post above and compare it to the four eye-witness accounts of what they saw and heard.
The audio is perfectly consistent with the witness accounts.
That's as likely a scenario as Excon's. wonder what the GJ will have to say?
I'm suggesting exactly what I said - that he was lying on the ground with blood seeping out of him.
Do you have any real evidence to the contrary?
If so. let's see it.
Read my post above and compare it to the four eye-witness accounts of what they saw and heard.
The audio is perfectly consistent with the witness accounts.
Attorney: New audio reveals pause in gunfire when Michael Brown was shot
By Holly Yan, CNNLawyer: Audio shows 11 shots when Michael Brown killed - CNN.com
updated 12:36 AM EDT, Tue August 26, 2014
[...]
In the recording, a quick series of shots can be heard, followed by a pause and then another quick succession of shots.
"I personally heard at least 11" shots, the man's attorney, Lopa Blumenthal, told CNN's Don Lemon.
The man, who asked that his identity not be revealed, lives near the site of the shooting and was close enough to have heard the gunshots, Blumenthal said.
He was speaking to a friend on a video chat service and happened to be recording the conversation at the same time Brown was shot, Blumenthal said.
[...]
11 Shots in 5 seconds.
Short pause between 6 and the other five. Likely Brown was still coming at him.
Just more evidence.
Is this exactly what the witnesses described? Brown was running and Wilson got out of his car shooting at Brown's back. There's no pause for Brown to "taunt" Wilson.
Brown wasn't shot in the back.
The witness lied
Eleven shots eh?
That's not at all consistent with the four to six the police are saying...hmmmmmm
...I wonder why they would lie about a thing like that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?