- Joined
- Mar 9, 2017
- Messages
- 22,102
- Reaction score
- 13,502
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Starting Point: This is NOT a thread about the existence of God, or gods. I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone. In fact, I'm going to try to do my best to stay out of this one, outside of the initial question. Not making any promises, but that's the intent. I'm posting this to learn something. At most I'll ask for clarification, if required.
Rather, this is a discussion around what it would take to bridge the gap we see here, between atheists and theists. We see a lot of angry posting here, that goes well beyond the academic debate of "real or not real", from both sides. Is there a way to deal with that anger, or is this a manifestation of the overly combative climate we find ourselves in generally?
Of course I have my own thoughts, but I'm trying to leave this wide open.
Important note: It is important to acknowledge that not all atheists and theists fall into the "angry" category. Many folks are happy to live and let live, irrespective of what camp they have landed in. If you are not "angry", which we'll define for this thread as going out of your way to disrespect someone for their lack of belief or belief as a starting point, then I am not attempting to say that you are.
So...if you're "angry" at atheists, what would it take your to not be? And, if you're "angry" at theists, what would it take to not be?
Starting Point: This is NOT a thread about the existence of God, or gods. I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone. In fact, I'm going to try to do my best to stay out of this one, outside of the initial question. Not making any promises, but that's the intent. I'm posting this to learn something. At most I'll ask for clarification, if required.
Rather, this is a discussion around what it would take to bridge the gap we see here, between atheists and theists. We see a lot of angry posting here, that goes well beyond the academic debate of "real or not real", from both sides. Is there a way to deal with that anger, or is this a manifestation of the overly combative climate we find ourselves in generally?
Of course I have my own thoughts, but I'm trying to leave this wide open.
Important note: It is important to acknowledge that not all atheists and theists fall into the "angry" category. Many folks are happy to live and let live, irrespective of what camp they have landed in. If you are not "angry", which we'll define for this thread as going out of your way to disrespect someone for their lack of belief or belief as a starting point, then I am not attempting to say that you are.
So...if you're "angry" at atheists, what would it take your to not be? And, if you're "angry" at theists, what would it take to not be?
It's difficult to have a discussion when we don't have definition of subject matter, or exclude what else should be in the range of subject.
Many people are not atheist but rather agnostic and may not know it but for giving some further, critical thought to the matter. Agnostics are more about science and recognize that the supernatural being cannot be proven but cannot be disproven either. Therefore, however slim the possibility, the existence of a supernatural being is "possible". An atheist believes there is no such thing and can't be any such thing. That it's an impossibility. Pretty much black and white. Einstein, for instance, was agnostic. Though he might just have said he's not an agnostic, he's a scientist.
Anyway, to your point, it bothers me when people do not practice what they expect of others, whether they be theist, atheist, agnostic, naturalist or what. It can make me angry when any group attempts to force, legally binding, their belief upon others that must be followed. I will add that it is much easier to practice atheism/agnosticism/naturalism or even deism than to practice some form of religion and say you practice what you preach. Much easier.
An atheist believes there is no such thing and can't be any such thing.
Starting Point: This is NOT a thread about the existence of God, or gods. I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone. In fact, I'm going to try to do my best to stay out of this one, outside of the initial question. Not making any promises, but that's the intent. I'm posting this to learn something. At most I'll ask for clarification, if required.
Rather, this is a discussion around what it would take to bridge the gap we see here, between atheists and theists. We see a lot of angry posting here, that goes well beyond the academic debate of "real or not real", from both sides. Is there a way to deal with that anger, or is this a manifestation of the overly combative climate we find ourselves in generally?
Of course I have my own thoughts, but I'm trying to leave this wide open.
Important note: It is important to acknowledge that not all atheists and theists fall into the "angry" category. Many folks are happy to live and let live, irrespective of what camp they have landed in. If you are not "angry", which we'll define for this thread as going out of your way to disrespect someone for their lack of belief or belief as a starting point, then I am not attempting to say that you are.
So...if you're "angry" at atheists, what would it take your to not be? And, if you're "angry" at theists, what would it take to not be?
Interesting thread.
Important distinction here. Are you asking about how people act and react to topics and comments here at DP, or are you asking more about "real life" interactions?
I do wonder, am I perceived as an "angry atheist" here at DP? I'd guess yes would be the answer.
I can tell you for sure I'm not an "angry atheist" in the real world.
I doubt anyone outside of my spouse and children have the slightest clue that I'm an atheist.
And again, I have Jehovah's Witnesses for in-laws. :shock:
For a start theists could finally accept that they do not in fact have evidence or even a good reason for the existence of a god, it is purely faith based.
Then you could drop the "angry" crap. That is nothing more than theists whinging that they are once again being persecuted for being told their arguments are pure ****. And that sentence is a deliberate example of how a theist will through some ridiculous moral belief system turn words such as crap and **** into proclamations of anger. Where as in fact they are nothing more than another atheist refusing to play the foolish morality of a theist.
And finally and more importantly than amusing myself with pointing out how silly the arguments of theists are, there is the dealing with the already mentioned ridiculous morality of a theist who insists that their moral judgments are sound because they come from a badly written book of fiction.
The list really can go on much further but it is really a case of listening to each individual theist and pointing out why they are wrong rather than just accepting their nonsense.
For a start theists could finally accept that they do not in fact have evidence or even a good reason for the existence of a god, it is purely faith based.
Then you could drop the "angry" crap. That is nothing more than theists whinging that they are once again being persecuted for being told their arguments are pure ****. And that sentence is a deliberate example of how a theist will through some ridiculous moral belief system turn words such as crap and **** into proclamations of anger. Where as in fact they are nothing more than another atheist refusing to play the foolish morality of a theist.
And finally and more importantly than amusing myself with pointing out how silly the arguments of theists are, there is the dealing with the already mentioned ridiculous morality of a theist who insists that their moral judgments are sound because they come from a badly written book of fiction.
The list really can go on much further but it is really a case of listening to each individual theist and pointing out why they are wrong rather than just accepting their nonsense.
Starting Point: This is NOT a thread about the existence of God, or gods. I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone. In fact, I'm going to try to do my best to stay out of this one, outside of the initial question. Not making any promises, but that's the intent. I'm posting this to learn something. At most I'll ask for clarification, if required.
Rather, this is a discussion around what it would take to bridge the gap we see here, between atheists and theists. We see a lot of angry posting here, that goes well beyond the academic debate of "real or not real", from both sides. Is there a way to deal with that anger, or is this a manifestation of the overly combative climate we find ourselves in generally?
Of course I have my own thoughts, but I'm trying to leave this wide open.
Important note: It is important to acknowledge that not all atheists and theists fall into the "angry" category. Many folks are happy to live and let live, irrespective of what camp they have landed in. If you are not "angry", which we'll define for this thread as going out of your way to disrespect someone for their lack of belief or belief as a starting point, then I am not attempting to say that you are.
So...if you're "angry" at atheists, what would it take your to not be? And, if you're "angry" at theists, what would it take to not be?
there isn't as much Bible-thumping anymore.
I consider myself a "happy" atheist, and I feel just as comfortable among the deeply religious as I do among the deeply irreligious. If anything, I generally find myself standing against ideological anti-theistic atheists who openly desire to seek the annihilation of religion in public life far more often than religious theocrats trying to impose their religious views on others, if only because the 1980s are dead and gone and there isn't as much Bible-thumping anymore.
My main thought when it comes to religion is to simply leave people alone and let them live their lives as they see fit.
Based on what information?
As Christians, people who follow the teachings of Jesus, we are directed to love atheists.
One of the weird things about this often nasty and depressing debate, is that is starts with competing definitions of the terms like 'atheist' 'agnostic' 'science' and 'faith' with each side digging in for future advantage in the semantics. The last thing I wouldt to do, for peace and harmony here is to start by defining terms because the bomb throwers start there too.It's difficult to have a discussion when we don't have definition of subject matter, or exclude what else should be in the range of subject.
Many people are not atheist but rather agnostic and may not know it but for giving some further, critical thought to the matter. Agnostics are more about science and recognize that the supernatural being cannot be proven but cannot be disproven either. Therefore, however slim the possibility, the existence of a supernatural being is "possible". An atheist believes there is no such thing and can't be any such thing. That it's an impossibility. Pretty much black and white. Einstein, for instance, was agnostic. Though he might just have said he's not an agnostic, he's a scientist.
Anyway, to your point, it bothers me when people do not practice what they expect of others, whether they be theist, atheist, agnostic, naturalist or what. It can make me angry when any group attempts to force, legally binding, their belief upon others that must be followed. I will add that it is much easier to practice atheism/agnosticism/naturalism or even deism than to practice some form of religion and say you practice what you preach. Much easier.
Starting Point: This is NOT a thread about the existence of God, or gods. I'm not trying to prove anything to anyone. In fact, I'm going to try to do my best to stay out of this one, outside of the initial question. Not making any promises, but that's the intent. I'm posting this to learn something. At most I'll ask for clarification, if required.
Rather, this is a discussion around what it would take to bridge the gap we see here, between atheists and theists. We see a lot of angry posting here, that goes well beyond the academic debate of "real or not real", from both sides. Is there a way to deal with that anger, or is this a manifestation of the overly combative climate we find ourselves in generally?
Of course I have my own thoughts, but I'm trying to leave this wide open.
Important note: It is important to acknowledge that not all atheists and theists fall into the "angry" category. Many folks are happy to live and let live, irrespective of what camp they have landed in. If you are not "angry", which we'll define for this thread as going out of your way to disrespect someone for their lack of belief or belief as a starting point, then I am not attempting to say that you are.
So...if you're "angry" at atheists, what would it take your to not be? And, if you're "angry" at theists, what would it take to not be?
“The whole war between the atheist and the theist comes down to this: the atheist believes a 'what' created the universe; the theist believes a 'who' created the universe.” ― Criss Jami, Killosophy
“The whole war between the atheist and the theist comes down to this: the atheist believes a 'what' created the universe; the theist believes a 'who' created the universe.” ― Criss Jami, Killosophy
As an atheist, I could easily tolerate the religious if:
1. They stay the **** out of politics
2. They stay the **** away from abortion clinics
3. They stay the **** away from me
4. They stay the **** off the goddamned TV
5. They pray in private like the good lord asked them to.
So...how do we bridge the gap? What can we do to tone down the rhetoric, to not take things so personally, to not escalate the division? Simply identifying as theist and atheist draws the line in the sand. We know we disagree, and will likely never stop. How do we put an end to the mutual abuse? What can YOU, personally, do?
That's more what I'm looking for here.
It's a bit deeper than that - do we owe that creator (a power larger than ourselves) anything or are we free to do as we please?
Both atheism (there is no god) and theism (there is a god) are belief systems (opinions?) based on faith (assumptions which cannot be proven/disproven). For someone having one belief system to accept (assume) the other's belief system is true then they must accept (assume) that their own belief system is false. What difference of opinion could possibly be harder to reconcile?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?