• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Arpaio admits he hired PI to investigate judge's wife

Based upon that incoherent rant, you obviously know very little about this subject. Too bad, if you started reading up on it, you would understand.
:lamo

Do you guys get together and try to practice that pathetic tactic thinking it will actually WORK?
 
:lamo

Do you guys get together and try to practice that pathetic tactic thinking it will actually WORK?

Vance, you are blathering now, and bringing in Clinton, and whatever and cursing, pretty pathetic proof that you have very little knowledge about this, but still want to make vapid comments.

You should read more.
 
Vance, you are blathering now, and bringing in Clinton, and whatever and cursing, pretty pathetic proof that you have very little knowledge about this, but still want to make vapid comments.

You should read more.
I didnt bring Clinton into it...I offered you a way of maintaining your sanity rather than continuing in your unhinged hatred to wards Arpaio. Do you need help with the big words?

Its rather comical. You throw out these cases...cases which apparently YOU havent a clue about. Now...you go right ahead and keep wetting yourself over meth addicts that attack cops, drug dealers, illegal immigrant **** fighters and their dogs, and every other pathetic case you want to.
 
I didnt bring Clinton into it...I offered you a way of maintaining your sanity rather than continuing in your unhinged hatred to wards Arpaio. Do you need help with the big words?

Its rather comical. You throw out these cases...cases which apparently YOU havent a clue about. Now...you go right ahead and keep wetting yourself over meth addicts that attack cops, drug dealers, illegal immigrant **** fighters and their dogs, and every other pathetic case you want to.

Yeah, you did, because you lost the argument and tried to bring other things into it.

Killing inmates waiting for trial...not a good thing to do. Breaking the law when you are the Sheriff, not a good thing to do. But, you can't even take the time to read up on Arpaio, because you are afraid you might learn something about your hero.
 
Yeah, you did, because you lost the argument and tried to bring other things into it.

Killing inmates waiting for trial...not a good thing to do. Breaking the law when you are the Sheriff, not a good thing to do. But, you can't even take the time to read up on Arpaio, because you are afraid you might learn something about your hero.

One of us has. Its painfully obvious which one has and which one is spouting imbalanced hate-filled rhetoric.

Hero...:lamo

Look dood...dont blame the rest of the world. You folk keep electing him. Keep whining and wetting yourself over it or do something about it.
 
One of us has. Its painfully obvious which one has and which one is spouting imbalanced hate-filled rhetoric.

Hero...:lamo

Look dood...dont blame the rest of the world. You folk keep electing him. Keep whining and wetting yourself over it or do something about it.

All I see coming from your responses is angry, vein popping hate. Because your hero is being exposed. Deal with it.
 
All I see coming from your responses is angry, vein popping hate. Because your hero is being exposed. Deal with it.
Shooooooore you do. :lamo

Face it. You fell off a cliff over a thread with a lie in the title about an article with a lie in it and the first thing you did was ran off in a continued stream of ohmi****ingawdiHATEJoeArpaio rants.
 
Shooooooore you do. :lamo

Face it. You fell off a cliff over a thread with a lie in the title about an article with a lie in it and the first thing you did was ran off in a continued stream of ohmi****ingawdiHATEJoeArpaio rants.

No lie anywhere in the article. If you lived here, you would know. Even the conservative radio guys are saying Arpaio is toast and should resign.

But...you don't have the ability to read up, because you don't want to learn about your hero. And each post of yours is just more angry yapping.
 
So some of the ex county sups got away with it.

Not to derail, but Mary Rose Wilcox is one I would not consider a shining star, unless someone is an illegal.:mrgreen:
Go ahead and show that MRW got away with "Tens of millions of dollars, and deaths and breaking the law." to anywhere near the extent of Joke. You can't, it is absurd to make an absolutist argument that if a supervisor did anything "like" the Joke, then they are "like" the Joke. You are trying to divert, because that is all the defenders of the Joke have, is to try to divert from the decades of insanity at the MCSO under the regime of the Joke. MRW was awarded $975K by the county BECAUSE OF the actions by Arpaio and his henchmen, which is a drop in the bucket the Joke has cost the residents of Maricopa Co. Apparently, it is the Joke that is not the brightest bulb for thinking he could harass County Sups, and his arrogance has led to think he could hire a PI and harass a Federal Judges wife. I hope he gets hit with intimidation charges, the Joke knows no boundaries.
 
Hey, my two cents. I could give a damn what Arpaio is costing you folks. What he has been doing is trying to stop the Illegal immigration and other law breaking liberals are supporting. With these illegal activities costing the nations taxpayers billions, your pittance paid out is meaningless.

Go Joe!!
BS, his job as County Sheriff is not to play ICE, his job is to protect County residents, which he has neglected. For years the MCSO neglected rampant child rape cases, that even a self conducted investigation showed:

“The deficiencies identified ... were not problems that stemmed from the conduct of one or a few individuals. Rather, I have determined that ... the MCSO sex-crimes unit was inadequately resourced to complete its tasks. The systemic problem could not then, and cannot now, be properly addressed or corrected by disciplining a few individuals,” sheriff’s Deputy Chief Brian Sands wrote last week to detectives at the center of the internal investigation......

Current and former employees say past staffing shortages were exacerbated by the agency's preoccupation with other priorities, such as illegal immigration, public corruption and animal-abuse crimes."


MCSO report: Blame the system for botched sex-crime cases
 
Last edited:
No lie anywhere in the article. If you lived here, you would know. Even the conservative radio guys are saying Arpaio is toast and should resign.

But...you don't have the ability to read up, because you don't want to learn about your hero. And each post of yours is just more angry yapping.
:lamo

Read it. Posted facts about it. The only one blathering is you. Cuz...well...you iz full of hatred. Quit whining and vote him out already. Then you can deal with the scumbags in your own special way. Maybe...hugs.
 
:lamo

Read it. Posted facts about it. The only one blathering is you. Cuz...well...you iz full of hatred. Quit whining and vote him out already. Then you can deal with the scumbags in your own special way. Maybe...hugs.


AND yet again -- the seeming inability of conservative minds to accept that there is always the possibility of more than two answers for every problem. The real world sees that firing Joe Arpaio DOES NOT mean the only possible outcome is some limp-wristed, Mexican-loving 'librul' criminal-hugger. The real world thinks that in a relatively conservative place like Maricopa County Arizona, the newly elected sheriff will most likely be politically conservative but somewhat less reactionary and hopefully much less willing to violate state and federal laws.

So, is the usual right wing response to every question always going to be "My Way or the Hiway"?

It has been said, probably on one of those liberal, left-wing blogs, that there are two properties which are always present in the minds of conservatives: Bilateral thought processes which only see two answers for every problem (my way or the hiway) AND fear
 
Not sure, we will find out, but honestly, it doesn't matter, he has admitted guilt, and there are some more bombshells coming out. This clown needs to be thrown in prison.

Guilt of what? Hiring a PI, what law does that violate?
 
Arpaio keeps getting elected because I guess the people like what he does.
 
Guilt of what? Hiring a PI, what law does that violate?
None. The question is, for what purpose, and we have posted about the Joke's long standing history of using any means necessary to intimidate...whether it is citizens, inmates, County Supervisors, State Judges.....and now Federal Judges. In the mind of a totalitarian thug, there is no greater authority than himself. You and your ilk recognize this, which is why he is so endearing.
 
Last edited:
Go ahead and show that MRW got away with "Tens of millions of dollars, and deaths and breaking the law." to anywhere near the extent of Joke. You can't, it is absurd to make an absolutist argument that if a supervisor did anything "like" the Joke, then they are "like" the Joke. You are trying to divert, because that is all the defenders of the Joke have, is to try to divert from the decades of insanity at the MCSO under the regime of the Joke. MRW was awarded $975K by the county BECAUSE OF the actions by Arpaio and his henchmen, which is a drop in the bucket the Joke has cost the residents of Maricopa Co. Apparently, it is the Joke that is not the brightest bulb for thinking he could harass County Sups, and his arrogance has led to think he could hire a PI and harass a Federal Judges wife. I hope he gets hit with intimidation charges, the Joke knows no boundaries.

Did I state any money amount?
Do agree with MRW when she was in office and how she protected illegal aliens?

So it is ok with you if a Federal judge wife allegedly states her husband is going to do everything he can to make sure JA is not relected.? If true, do you have a problem with that or not?

Look, imo, this will be JA undoing. Hope voters will not elect officials who protect illegal aliens.
 
AND yet again -- the seeming inability of conservative minds to accept that there is always the possibility of more than two answers for every problem. The real world sees that firing Joe Arpaio DOES NOT mean the only possible outcome is some limp-wristed, Mexican-loving 'librul' criminal-hugger. The real world thinks that in a relatively conservative place like Maricopa County Arizona, the newly elected sheriff will most likely be politically conservative but somewhat less reactionary and hopefully much less willing to violate state and federal laws.

So, is the usual right wing response to every question always going to be "My Way or the Hiway"?

It has been said, probably on one of those liberal, left-wing blogs, that there are two properties which are always present in the minds of conservatives: Bilateral thought processes which only see two answers for every problem (my way or the hiway) AND fear
The limpwristed whiny response has been to rattle off a bunch of pathetic sympathy ploys over a guy who had his dog shot during a **** fight, a meth addict that attacked cps and got tased (you know...TASED...the thing liberals keep saying cops should do instead of shooting, beating, choking, etc) and every other defense of crime and criminal. Joe Arpaio's main 'offense' is that he is tough on crime (gasp!), believes in enforcement of existing immigration law (OHMIGAWD!!!) and doesnt coddle the prisoners in his jails (that BRUTE!).

So again...quite ****ing whining about the man, run a better candidate, and do the ****ing job better.
 
He didn't hire the PI, his attorney did.

:neutral:

Are you really so naive to the ways of the world that you cannot make the connection?
 
Lets review your claims:
Tens of millions of dollars, and deaths and breaking the law. If that is the kind of elected official you want, so be it. But he is a crook.
and your opinion is noted.Then JA not much different than some of the ex country supervisors. :mrgreen:
Sheriff Joke is nowhere near any Maricopa COUNTY supervisor in costs to the COUNTY, not by a long shot. What is ironic is that the COUNTY has had to payout to former sups for wrongdoing by Joke.
So some of the ex county sups got away with it. Not to derail, but Mary Rose Wilcox is one I would not consider a shining star, unless someone is an illegal.:mrgreen:
Go ahead and show that MRW got away with "Tens of millions of dollars, and deaths and breaking the law." to anywhere near the extent of Joke. You can't, it is absurd to make an absolutist argument that if a supervisor did anything "like" the Joke, then they are "like" the Joke. You are trying to divert, because that is all the defenders of the Joke have, is to try to divert from the decades of insanity at the MCSO under the regime of the Joke. MRW was awarded $975K by the county BECAUSE OF the actions by Arpaio and his henchmen, which is a drop in the bucket the Joke has cost the residents of Maricopa Co. Apparently, it is the Joke that is not the brightest bulb for thinking he could harass County Sups, and his arrogance has led to think he could hire a PI and harass a Federal Judges wife. I hope he gets hit with intimidation charges, the Joke knows no boundaries.
Did I state any money amount?
No, we did, it was part of the criteria of damage done to Maricopa COUNTY by the Joke.....who YOU were comparing to MRW, who you said "got away with it", meaning costing the county "millions" in costs, of course it was implied.... and your "I did not state a specific sum" is a pointless retort, a diversion. So, as part of that score, you are zero for one.

But do continue...
Do agree with MRW when she was in office
Do I agree with MRW...on everything? Again, an absolutist argument, a rhetorical device, empty and off point like your first part of this response.

and how she protected illegal aliens?
Um, she was going after the Joke for misuse of COUNTY funding in trying to play border patrol instead of protecting COUNTY residents. Since you can't be specific in your charge (probably because you don't know what you are talking about), you are zero for 3.

But continue...

So it is ok with you if a Federal judge wife allegedly states her husband is going to do everything he can to make sure JA is not relected.? If true, do you have a problem with that or not?
When this is investigated by the court, and is found to be without warrant, are you going to be repentant at all in believing yet another set of false allegations brought by the Joke and his office......just like the false allegations brought against COUNTY Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox, that cost Maricopa County $975K just in penalties, not including court costs, not including penalties paid to other COUNTY sups in the case?

Anything else you want to distract with in regards to damages MRW supposedly cost Maricopa COUNTY?

Look, imo, this will be JA undoing. Hope voters will not elect officials who protect illegal aliens.
The case, Melendres v. Arpaio, is not about "protecting illegals", it is about the Joke creating the leadership that caused legal Maricopa COUNTY residents to be illegally racially profiled by the MCSO. The case is about protecting AMERICAN citizens and their rights. It has nothing to do with MRW and her supposed damage to the COUNTY on a scale comparable in any manner to the Joke.

Zero for whatever, phail.
 
I live in Maricopa county, he has cost us dozens of millions, and more coming. Means something to me, he is a piece of waste. He is corrupt, you don't know the full story, and there are lots of stories. He thinks he is above the law, people have died in tent city (denied insulin, beaten by guards, choked to death) and it has cost us millions of dollars. He is a slimy goon. You just eat the PR he feeds you, but, if you read up, you will learn.

Be quite! Don't you know that VanceMack know more about your county than you do!
 
Be quite! Don't you know that VanceMack know more about your county than you do!

It is painfully obvious that he hasn't read anything about Arpaio, his history, the reason for this hearing, etc. Arpaio fans have to cocoon themselves in ignorance, lest they find out that their hero is a crook.
 
It is painfully obvious that he hasn't read anything about Arpaio, his history, the reason for this hearing, etc. Arpaio fans have to cocoon themselves in ignorance, lest they find out that their hero is a crook.

It's painfully obvious all you have done is spout rhetoric in your hatred of Arpaio. And now you have a cheerleader. :lamo
 
It is painfully obvious that he hasn't read anything about Arpaio, his history, the reason for this hearing, etc. Arpaio fans have to cocoon themselves in ignorance, lest they find out that their hero is a crook.

Oh, I would disagree. I'm absolutely positive he has read lots of very positive, though unconnected with reality, words about that real "Amurrican", Joe Arpaio. A sheriff who is doing his job in defiance of those Marxists and Muslims in Washington --- or something like that.
 
It's painfully obvious all you have done is spout rhetoric in your hatred of Arpaio. And now you have a cheerleader. :lamo

I know more about it than you do, because you choose to stay ignorant and not read up. Pity, you'd figure it out, eventually.
 
Back
Top Bottom