Lets review your claims:
Tens of millions of dollars, and deaths and breaking the law. If that is the kind of elected official you want, so be it. But he is a crook.
and your opinion is noted.Then JA not much different than some of the ex country supervisors. :mrgreen:
Sheriff Joke is nowhere near any Maricopa COUNTY supervisor in costs to the COUNTY, not by a long shot. What is ironic is that the COUNTY has had to payout to former sups for wrongdoing by Joke.
So some of the ex county sups got away with it. Not to derail, but Mary Rose Wilcox is one I would not consider a shining star, unless someone is an illegal.:mrgreen:
Go ahead and show that MRW got away with "Tens of millions of dollars, and deaths and breaking the law." to anywhere near the extent of Joke. You can't, it is absurd to make an absolutist argument that if a supervisor did anything "like" the Joke, then they are "like" the Joke. You are trying to divert, because that is all the defenders of the Joke have, is to try to divert from the decades of insanity at the MCSO under the regime of the Joke. MRW was awarded $975K by the county BECAUSE OF the actions by Arpaio and his henchmen, which is a drop in the bucket the Joke has cost the residents of Maricopa Co. Apparently, it is the Joke that is not the brightest bulb for thinking he could harass County Sups, and his arrogance has led to think he could hire a PI and harass a Federal Judges wife. I hope he gets hit with intimidation charges, the Joke knows no boundaries.
Did I state any money amount?
No, we did, it was part of the criteria of damage done to Maricopa COUNTY by the Joke.....who YOU were comparing to MRW, who you said "got away with it", meaning costing the county "millions" in costs, of course it was implied.... and your "I did not state a specific sum" is a pointless retort, a diversion. So, as part of that score, you are zero for one.
But do continue...
Do agree with MRW when she was in office
Do I agree with MRW...on everything? Again, an absolutist argument, a rhetorical device, empty and off point like your first part of this response.
and how she protected illegal aliens?
Um, she was going after the Joke for misuse of COUNTY funding in trying to play border patrol instead of protecting COUNTY residents. Since you can't be specific in your charge (probably because you don't know what you are talking about), you are zero for 3.
But continue...
So it is ok with you if a Federal judge wife allegedly states her husband is going to do everything he can to make sure JA is not relected.? If true, do you have a problem with that or not?
When this is investigated by the court, and is found to be without warrant, are you going to be repentant at all in believing yet another set of false allegations brought by the Joke and his office......just like the false allegations brought against COUNTY Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox, that cost Maricopa County $975K just in penalties, not including court costs, not including penalties paid to other COUNTY sups in the case?
Anything else you want to distract with in regards to damages MRW supposedly cost Maricopa COUNTY?
Look, imo, this will be JA undoing. Hope voters will not elect officials who protect illegal aliens.
The case, Melendres v. Arpaio, is not about "protecting illegals", it is about the Joke creating the leadership that caused legal Maricopa COUNTY residents to be illegally racially profiled by the MCSO. The case is about protecting AMERICAN citizens and their rights. It has nothing to do with MRW and her supposed damage to the COUNTY on a scale comparable in any manner to the Joke.
Zero for whatever, phail.