• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Are you more favorable toward Obama due to bhkad's posts?

Are you more favorable toward Obama due to bhkad's Anti-Obama posts?

  • No, Less favorable

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    29
So which is it, liar, did I fake the screenshot or did I type php? You can't even keep your smears straight. Like Lincoln said, "No one has a memory good enough to be a successful liar." I clicked a link provided by Gladiator.

That link had a link to a php extension. That is what I clicked on.


Look liar, i am going by what you posted, then what you jumped to claim, to what you suggested after you were caught liar. :2wave:


Sarah Palin lies about her 16 yr. old unmarried daughter's Down Syndrome baby. - talk.politics.misc | Google Groups






The link I clicked on of his was this:
Sarah Palin lies about her 16 yr. old unmarried daughter's Down Syndrome baby. - talk.politics.misc | Google Groups

Nothing faked, nothing typed. The dishonesty is on whoever put that link on the page that Gladiator linked to. I shouldn't have trusted that link, that is obvious. But I wasn't dishonest.




but yet when you were confronted with this you continued to suggest that they changed the page? if you were caught, why continue it?


I followed that link and it went back to dailykos. Odd...


Perhaps you were not being dishonest. but in today's DP, that is the 1st thing we do here call other posters dishonest.

Sucks doesn't it. :2wave:
 
Last edited:
My apologizes, I thought you meant his statement down here. I had no such knowledge of the one you just linked. I was speaking more to a number of posts you've made in threads that Me and CC are not participating in where you've specifically are dropping our names in a baiting, derogatory, fashion such as here.


I see so I am not allowed to joke about things.



From looking at the point that CC was making, it appears what he is meaning by trolling is the fact you're making posts that say nothing but QFT, and doing it repeatedly. This is a form of trolling. IT is the same thing when people post picture after picture after picture, or if someone repeatedly enters into a thread just to give a one liner after a large quote over and over.

twice, two points I agreed with.


But yes, my apologies, I was under the impression it was referencing something other than what you posted, which I didn't know about.

not a problem


No, I don't have any desire to really respond to you about these things any longer and likely won't down here unless its to clear something up to you or when you're out and out lieing about something I've done or said. Its not worth my time to be worrying about you and your yapping.



and there we have it. you calling me a liar.



See I deleted your other crap because it was a clearly misrepresenting me and an example of your dishonesty.

But I kept the part in where you called me a liar to expose your dumb ass for what it is.


Hace a nice f ucking day. :2wave:
 
Look liar, i am going by what you posted, then what you jumped to claim, to what you suggested after you were caught liar.







but yet when you were confronted with this you continued to suggest that they changed the page? if you were caught, why continue it?


I followed that link and it went back to dailykos. Odd...


Perhaps you were not being dishonest. but in today's DP, that is the 1st thing we do here call other posters dishonest.

Sucks doesn't it.

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Yeah, now maybe you can get the most respected members here to call me a "liar, liar, pants on fire."

Now I know why teacher didn't wear pants. :mrgreen:
 
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Yeah, now maybe you can get the most respected members here to call me a "liar, liar, pants on fire."

Now I know why teacher didn't wear pants. :mrgreen:

In all honesty, I don't think you know or care if you lie or not. If the rest of the mods decide something, that becomes truth for you.
 
In all honesty, I don't think you know or care if you lie or not. If the rest of the mods decide something, that becomes truth for you.

You are good at the accusations and speculations. Now it's time to put up some evidence. I was confronting Rev. from the time he got here. They are the ones late to the party.
 
In all my time here I can't think of one instance in which IT2002 has deliberately lied about a real issue on this forum. I'm not counting the Basement stuff where we all create flames and gags against other posters, but upstairs or during any serious issue, he has not deliberately lied that I have ever seen.
 
In all my time here I can't think of one instance in which IT2002 has deliberately lied about a real issue on this forum. I'm not counting the Basement stuff where we all create flames and gags against other posters, but upstairs or during any serious issue, he has not deliberately lied that I have ever seen.

Thanks bro.

:2wave:
 
In all my time here I can't think of one instance in which IT2002 has deliberately lied about a real issue on this forum. I'm not counting the Basement stuff where we all create flames and gags against other posters, but upstairs or during any serious issue, he has not deliberately lied that I have ever seen.

I agree 100%

The same can be said about CC and, from what I can tell, Zyph.
Some of us just don't lie... don't need to, to be honest.

Goofing and ****ing with idiots is seperate from having an adult communication with another adult.
 
anyone else from the clique want to chime in? i can post the oh mickey video again! :2wave:



so either he lied or he is the retard i contended he was..... :lol:




serioulsly though as i said, it sucks being called dishonest, doesn't it?


carry on.
 
The Rev has made several references stating the forum is going to hell in a hand basket (paraphrasing of course, don’t want to be accused of being in on the lying cabal). ;)

I seem to be noticing more new members on the threads lately, that leaves the question of what is the numbers now, as apposed to…say six months ago? Have we lost more than we gained?:confused:
 
anyone else from the clique want to chime in? i can post the oh mickey video again! :2wave:



so either he lied or he is the retard i contended he was..... :lol:




serioulsly though as i said, it sucks being called dishonest, doesn't it?


carry on.

Why do I have to be part of a clique to think that he isn't a liar?
 
The Rev has made several references stating the forum is going to hell in a hand basket (paraphrasing of course, don’t want to be accused of being in on the lying cabal). ;)

I seem to be noticing more new members on the threads lately, that leaves the question of what is the numbers now, as apposed to…say six months ago? Have we lost more than we gained?:confused:



so membership #=quality?

couple of questions.


1. what is the increase in donations?

2. has the quality of threads improved, gotten lower, or stayed the same?
 
so membership #=quality?

couple of questions.


1. what is the increase in donations?

quality?

I guess that’s purely a matter of perspective isn’t it? Define what you mean by quality of post. grammar?

Man that one I would fail hands down, don’t mean that with a little effort people can manage to interpret my post.

Tahnks to the miriclaes of spell check my miserable spilling is camaflouged. :3oops:


Well don’t see any fund drives on lately and the glitches of the past have pretty well been eliminated, at least for the times that I have been on. As for as donations, i,m paid up until 11-26-09,seems to me its pretty well run forum; you don’t have mods of all one political persuasion, pretty good mix of both sides and they will manage to jump on on your case when they see an abuse even when it comes from someone with there own political views.

If a donation was held tomorrow I would(hey vauge take a hike or something)donate again, as I think we have a very well run/moderated forum here, and yes I have managed to get my first 3 pointer within the last week.

I wear it as a badge of honor. :2wave:


2. has the quality of threads improved, gotten lower, or stayed the
same?

Good grief man, its two months out from an national election, on a political forum, what the hell do you expect?
 
Last edited:
quality?

I guess that’s purely a matter of perspective isn’t it? Define what you mean by quality of post. grammar?

Man that one I would fail hands down, don’t mean that with a little effort people can manage to interpret my post.

Tahnks to the miriclaes of spell check my miserable spilling is camaflouged. :3oops:


:lol: I don't do gramattical or spelling quality so no... that is not the quality here.


Tell me is quality more on topic discussions or "your a liar", "screw you your a liar" "prove I am a liar" type posts?


Well don’t see any fund drives on lately and the glitches of the past have pretty well been eliminated, at least for the times that I have been on. As for as donations, i,m paid up until 11-26-09,seems to me its pretty well run forum; you don’t have mods of all one political persuasion, pretty good mix of both sides and they will manage to jump on on your case when they see an abuse even when it comes from someone with there own political views.


New members and donations I would guess correllate to percieved enjoyment of the forums.... Moderators calling other posters dishonest because they disagree with whos hospital it is, I don't think helps that goal, do you?


If a donation was held tomorrow I would(hey vauge take a hike or something)donate again, as I think we have a very well run/moderated forum here, and yes I have managed to get my first 3 pointer within the last week.

I wear it as a badge of honor. :2wave:


Good for you, Given the recent selective treatment I have recieved here, I would be hesitant.


and I have no points as of now.


Good grief man, its two months out from an national election, on a political forum, what the hell do you expect?



I expect these two mods not to cop out and claim they have no time to see hautey's hyper-partisan posts, but catch all of what they percieve to be mine.

That would be a nice start.
 
Quote the Rev

I expect these two mods not to cop out and claim they have no time to see hautey's hyper-partisan posts, but catch all of what they percieve to be mine.

That would be a nice start.


Ok, now were getting somewhere,the two mods in question have a hardon for you, At least from your viewpoint? If you go back and try a, and I know its hard, (at least it would be for this hardheaded truckdriver), to look at the post/s? in question that just maybe, you might have minuscule part in your perceived problem?

Also why are you dropping a dime on hautey
.:confused:
 
Quote the Rev

I expect these two mods not to cop out and claim they have no time to see hautey's hyper-partisan posts, but catch all of what they percieve to be mine.

That would be a nice start.


Ok, now were getting somewhere,the two mods in question have a hardon for you, At least from your viewpoint? If you go back and try a, and I know its hard, (at least it would be for this hardheaded truckdriver), to look at the post/s? in question that just maybe, you might have minuscule part in your perceived problem?



I never claimed innocence, however given thier targeted campaign, I hardly think thier objectives are as noble as it seems.


Also why are you dropping a dime on hautey



He is part of the chosen crew. His posts while they will critisize. don't seem to be willing to be as harsh as they are on him as they are on me.


Here is a clear example:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...ur-his-onetime-media-base-election-nears.html


I have never been this "dishonest" in any of my posts, and I challenge the mod who rightfully disagreed with hautey but reserved the "dishonesty" attack for another poster to demonstrate how I have ever even come close to this level of "hyper-partisanism" andto show me an example where I was blatantly dishonest.


Yet zyph calls me a liar.



This is my point.
 
Last edited:
Zyph in post #7 in reply to hautey

(I'm completely confused by your accusation here that somehow everyone was fine and dandy with the Obama is a Muslim thing, with no one in the media or candidates speaking out...but your assertion it seems that everyone is standing up for the attacks and smears on palin's kids?)

A rather long sentence, which politely says what? Me being a truck driver on another forum, would jump in and say in reply,” man are you out of your friggin mind”(without the friggin) seems that Zyph managed to say the same that I would have said,without pissing someone off. ;)

So your contending that he managed to piss you off in answering one of your 7,515 post? Hey, Zyph, and the Capn, don’t get paid for their time they put moderating this, in my opinion, well run forum.

Before you get all paranoid and say well you must be part of “the chosen crew”, no, as a matter of fact one of the two mentioned gave me my three pointer.

You say in post#192, “ I have no points as of now.” Whats the problem?you just pissed off because one/or more of the mods in your opinion managed to piss you off? Comeon, get of the bull**** high horse and start posting something some **** about "Sarah Palin".:mrgreen:
 
Zyph in post #7 in reply to hautey

(I'm completely confused by your accusation here that somehow everyone was fine and dandy with the Obama is a Muslim thing, with no one in the media or candidates speaking out...but your assertion it seems that everyone is standing up for the attacks and smears on palin's kids?)

A rather long sentence, which politely says what? Me being a truck driver on another forum, would jump in and say in reply,” man are you out of your friggin mind”(without the friggin) seems that Zyph managed to say the same that I would have said,without pissing someone off. ;)

So your contending that he managed to piss you off in answering one of your 7,515 post? Hey, Zyph, and the Capn, don’t get paid for their time they put moderating this, in my opinion, well run forum.

Before you get all paranoid and say well you must be part of “the chosen crew”, no, as a matter of fact one of the two mentioned gave me my three pointer.

You say in post#192, “ I have no points as of now.” Whats the problem?you just pissed off because one/or more of the mods in your opinion managed to piss you off? Comeon, get of the bull**** high horse and start posting something some **** about "Sarah Palin".:mrgreen:



i don't view you as part of the chosen crew at all....



Note he did not call him dishonest, but since it is out in the open took the time to gently point out his error.


Had it been me with a comment like that, do you think Zyph would hesitate to call me a dishonest poster?



History has shown this answer to be "no".
 
i don't view you as part of the chosen crew at all....



Note he did not call him dishonest, but since it is out in the open took the time to gently point out his error.


Had it been me with a comment like that, do you think Zyph would hesitate to call me a dishonest poster?



History has shown this answer to be "no".


Kool, now get your ass upstairs where your needed. :beatdeadhorse
 
anyone else from the clique want to chime in? i can post the oh mickey video again! :2wave:



so either he lied or he is the retard i contended he was..... :lol:




serioulsly though as i said, it sucks being called dishonest, doesn't it?


carry on.

I'm not part of the clique. Zyph has gigged me on multiple occasions and the PM's were not exercises in sparing my feelings. My responses to him were not necessarily "thank you sir."

You accused IT of being a liar, he is not. Plain and simple. There is no evidence of him being a liar. And he's not a retard. There is no evidence of this.

It does suck being called dishonest if you are not actually being dishonest.
 
Back
Top Bottom