What would you know?
Nope, that's another one of your follies. Still better than that left-wing, corrupt, cellulite crooked Hillary. That was your pick of the litter.
Well, to be fair, we don't know that Trump has cheated on his wife at all in at least 10 years. We do know that Bill Clinton walked around the White House with his pants unzipped, not to mention the Governor's mansion.
Actually, we do.
Keep up.
Your first paragraph is nonsensical and debate filler. You have yet to demonstrate how intellectualism is the root of all evil.
Political quizzes are worthless. Instead, let’s discuss policy prescriptions and how we should pragmatically tackle the issues of the day while ensuring effective results. For starters, I have yet to debate a libertarian who strongly opposes the Civil Rights Act & Voting Rights Act (I know many opppse these laws but few are willing to command a debate to persuade others that we would be better as a society without them). Lew Rockwell’s racist articles in Ron Paul’s newsletter was sort of the beginning of the end of libertarianism for me. Second example: should this country overturn the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act because it is an unfunded mandate and federally unconstitutional? I know Ron Paul’s followers admire the good ol’ days when Catholic Churches took care of those who could not afford to pay their medical bills, but we need to look at today’s healthcare system and decide once and for all if hospitals should be allowed to dump patients or refuse treatment. Hipppcratic Oath aside, should we reserve this right to the hospital groups or continue to protect a patient’s right to immediate medical treatment in the event of an emergency. Those who support the latter choose the slippery slope of progressivism, regardless if they self-identify as a libertarian, democrat, or republican.
Absolutely. I mean, how else could you describe Marla Maples except as a home wrecker? It's a long term pattern.
From the guy that created his own god to be his hitman.
You got nothing but your hypocrisy and your perverted version of god.
Just curious. The left claim that the uneducated people voted Trump into office. I say there are more uneducated on the left than there are on the right.
There are millions of uneducated people in the inner cities who only vote democrat. I would venture to say that 75% of democratic voters are uneducated.
There are millions of uneducated people in the inner cities who only vote democrat. I would venture to say that 75% of democratic voters are uneducated.
Wrong!There are millions of uneducated people in the inner cities who only vote democrat. I would venture to say that 75% of democratic voters are uneducated.
Just curious. The left claim that the uneducated people voted Trump into office. I say there are more uneducated on the left than there are on the right.
By uneducated, what do you mean? Do you mean people who literally have not completed compulsory public education (high school drop-outs)? Or people who are simply ill-informed or ignorant about certain political issues?
The liberals are twice as dumb as the conservatives
Your question is mostly irrelevant.
200 years ago, academia consisted of practicing Christians; today it doesn't.
100 years ago mainstream academia voted one way; today it votes another.
40 years ago mainstream academia accepted Communist theories; today it doesn't.
The inconsistencies in the above stances occur within a timeframe that is too short for genetics to explain. Ergo socio-economic and environmental pressures, which do nothing to validate one political lean or another.
[FONT="][/FONT][FONT="]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henlee_Hulix_Barnette
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Henlee Hulix Barnette (August 14, 1911 – October 20, 2004) was an American social activist, professor of Christian ethics, minister, and author. His first book, Introducing Christian Ethics (1961), became a standard text in his field. He marched with Martin Luther King and met with Nikita Khrushchev to set up a college student exchange program with the Soviet Union……..[/FONT]
[FONT="]http://www.jacoblupfer.com/blog/2015/1/20/southern-baptists-martin-luther-king-problem
[/FONT]
[FONT="]Jacob Lupfer[/FONT]
Yesterday, on the holiday honoring the life and legacy of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a tweet from a Southern Baptist seminary administrator caught my attention.
https://twitter.com/AdamGreenway/status/557191383426277376/photo/1
[FONT="]How nice! At a time when many white Christians in the South remained virulently racist and most of the rest were shamefully timid, these three Christian gentlemen welcomed Dr. King to the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary’s campus in Louisville, Kentucky.[/FONT]
[FONT="]While thousands of Southern Baptist pastors vehemently opposed integration, [/FONT][FONT="]the forward-thinking men of SBTS were on the Right Side of History.[/FONT]
[FONT="]But what do today’s Southern Baptist leaders really think of the Reverend Dr. Henlee Barnette, the legendary Baptist ethicist who taught at Southern from 1951-1977? Probably not much.[/FONT]
[FONT="]https://twitter.com/AdamGreenway/status/557191383426277376/photo/1[/FONT]
[FONT="]The SBC is justly proud of its academics, ethicists, and activists who prophetically denounced racism and called on white Protestants to repent of their sinful, discriminatory attitudes – attitudes that many perversely derived from the Bible itself. But how many of these leaders (and their proteges) survived the denomination’s purge of moderates in the 1980s?[/FONT]
[FONT="]Henlee Barnette would not be allowed to teach at SBC seminaries today. So why, exactly, do Baptist elites want to celebrate him? Did he invite Dr. King to Louisville in faithfulness to a Bible he did not believe in and a God he did not know?[/FONT]
[FONT="]Barnette did the right thing because his theology and biblical interpretations were right. Southern Baptists can’t have it both ways. Maybe the Reverend Dr. Barnette was right about a few other things, too.[/FONT]
At a time when the city hosting the SBC seminary was vigorously enforcing segregation, Dr. King's mother was a welcome visitor at the SBC seminaryUnfortunately facts are aren't your friend. But there's hope! Trump has introduced the all new and fresh alternative facts. When the real world doesn't agree with you, go with pure unadulterated bull**** It works for the rednecks, Will it work for you?
SBTS – Dr. King's Visit - The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
SBTS ? Dr. King?s Visit
“Dr. King slowly and quietly recognized Dr. Howington, members of the faculty, students, and visitors. Then he expressed his pleasure at being in the seminary chapel again. He noted that he had been in the chapel two or three times before with his mother who was organist for the Woman's Auxiliary of the National Baptist ...
Just curious. The left claim that the uneducated people voted Trump into office. I say there are more uneducated on the left than there are on the right.
I was an idealistic libertarian like you once. That was until I realized the only effective strategy to bring about a libertarian system of government is through violence, revolution, and subsequent chaos. Libertarians prefer to watch it all burn down so they can start over. Instead, I prefer to keep the current system and improve upon it. Most Americans are reformists anyway, not revolutionaries.
Unfortunately facts are aren't your friend. But there's hope! Trump has introduced the all new and fresh alternative facts. When the real world doesn't agree with you, go with pure unadulterated bull**** It works for the rednecks, Will it work for you?
I would disagree in that the left is overly educated in schools of less serious nature, that have a liberal lean.
Its called "indoctrination."
This isn't about an education level, but rather what schools most the educated come from.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...ing-beliefs-were-best-predictor-trump-support
[h=1]Childrearing Beliefs Were Best Predictor of Trump Support[/h][h=2]A poll with four weird questions helps explain Trump’s surprising victory.[/h][FONT="]Posted Feb 01, 2017
......It turned out that these questions were, for Republicans, by far the best predictors of who planned to vote for Trump—better than gender, age, race, income, religiosity, or anything else that was asked.[/FONT]
[FONT="]There was method in MacWilliams’s seeming madness of asking questions about childrearing in a political poll. Answers to these questions had been shown in previous research to be an excellent index of an [FONT="]authoritarian [/FONT]outlook on life. People who choose the first in each of the adjective pairs (respectful, obedient, well-behaved, well-mannered) have been shown to be generally high in authoritarianism and people who choose the second (independent, self-reliant, considerate, curious) have been shown to be generally low in that trait.[/FONT]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian_personality
Authoritarian personality is a state of mind or attitude characterized by belief in absolute obedience or submission to someone else’s authority, as well as the administration of that belief through the oppression of one's subordinates. It usually applies to individuals who are known or viewed as having an authoritative, strict, or oppressive personality towards subordinates...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?