Hmmm thats strange if there really is a pandemic we wouldnt see democrats in massive crowds every single night rioting and burning America down, yet we do. So which is it? Is there a pandemic or not? If there is why arent you mad at the massive crowds of democrats rioting in our streets? Are you a hypocrite? Guess we will find out next post.I heard there’s a pandemic on. 200k families have said “ouch”. Losers and suckers.
Are you adding that to your original criteria? Asking for a friend.
Hmmm thats strange if there really is a pandemic we wouldnt see democrats in massive crowds every single night rioting and burning America down, yet we do. So which is it? Is there a pandemic or not? If there is why arent you mad at the massive crowds of democrats rioting in our streets? Are you a hypocrite? Guess we will find out next post.
Are you mad ar rioters or not?If you want to call Trump a liar, he’s your candidate.
Are you mad ar rioters or not?
Thanks for that. I'm glad she knows it would not have a partisan impact, and demonstrates her genuine character.We already have it...
We should we run from that? If we can have 45% at least of the country believe the election is illegitimate if Trump “loses” then we should be embracing this position of not leaving and thus triggering the conflict we know is coming. We’re
Dealing with democrats who support rapists, murderers and drug dealers over the cops, who show up to peoples houses with Guilliotines, who condone violence, destroy people’s business for not catering to perverts, and on top of all that they are threatening to nuke the constitutional order and we actually don’t even live under the constitution anymore.
I say we shouldn’t be quick to say “oh of course Trump will leave” if we’re going to have civil war let’s have it on our terms
"We're talking about Justice Scalia, the staunchest conservative on the court, and we're talking about him being replaced by someone who could dramatically flip the balance of power on the court," Barrett continued. "It's not a lateral move."
It's also a legal definition. If the mother is killed in a crime, it can be a double homicide. Indeed, this is the usual construction. Your construction is atypical.Great, but even in common usage, people say “pregnant with child” but it’s not necessarily a stance on abortion. It’s just a turn of phrase.
It's also a legal definition. If the mother is killed in a crime, it can be a double homicide. Indeed, this is the usual construction. Your construction is atypical.
That is exactly what it does. Only if the woman chooses to abort is it considered anything else.That’s just for charging purposes. It does not lend legal definition to a fetus as a person.
That is exactly what it does. Only if the woman chooses to abort is it considered anything else.
Where have you looked? Bill Maher called he a "****ing idiots". Senator Blumenthal called he "illegitimate" and refused to meet with here. Several leftie loonies are attacking her for adopting Haitian children.The right wing screamosphere keeps insisting this is a thing that’s going on. I have yet to see it. Does anyone have any legit instances of this?
TWitter randos, message board randos (like me!) don’t count. Op ed columnists do not count. Sorry, but if we’re gonna play that game all day then there’s no reason we can’t take any handful of rando cons on this board and say “Here is the official GOP response to...”
So? Anyone?
Where have you looked? Bill Maher called he a "****ing idiots". Senator Blumenthal called he "illegitimate" and refused to meet with here. Several leftie loonies are attacking her for adopting Haitian children.
Blumenthal is not attacking her kids or religion. Maher is a comedian who hosts an HBO show. He’s not a member of the DNC.
You asked about ANYONE criticizing for her religion or family. Maher qualifies as "anyone". The kids she adopted are part of her family - as I said several leftwing "spokes people" are attacking her on that front.Blumenthal is not attacking her kids or religion. Maher is a comedian who hosts an HBO show. He’s not a member of the DNC.
You asked about ANYONE criticizing for her religion or family. Maher qualifies as "anyone". The kids she adopted are part of her family - as I said several leftwing "spokes people" are attacking her on that front.
Funny, you guys keep making things up vs proving anything. Except that there are no attacks on her religion or family.
The Dims haven’t started yet. If the Rs are smart they won’t let it last more than an afternoon.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe you should read it again.No I didn’t. Read the OP. Or begone.
Maybe you should read it again.
You asked about ANYONE criticizing for her religion or family. Maher qualifies as "anyone". The kids she adopted are part of her family - as I said several leftwing "spokes people" are attacking her on that front.
Senator Stolen Valor can go **** himself.Senator Blumenthal called he "illegitimate" and refused to meet with here.
That may be but in part because the Dems aren’t attacking her family or religion.
Thanks, Alphie!
Yeah, you rule out practicWhy, did it change since I wrote it?
Of course she did. She eliminated about 99% of left wing slobber-slinging and then asks were the Dems are bad mouthing ACB.She's eliminated all of the people who are currently attacking Barrett's religion or family.
So nothing yet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?