• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are all of you anti-choice people on a bone marrow donor registry?

Everyone dies at some point, which doesn't mean that you purposefully killed them.
That has zero to do with the discussion. You ceded the argument. Facile empty statements like above dont advance a failed argument.

The OP is about a 'decision' that will or wont result in the death of a person.
 
That's factually incorrect.
No, you are totally wrong! LOLOLOL

Here's solid evidence: if the unborn could be removed without killing it...would women choose not to kill it? Probably not but again, since there would be a 'choice,' then it's not about killing but about ending the pregnancy.

Nice try. Even look up the definition of abortion. It's a procedure to terminate a pregnancy.
 
That has zero to do with the discussion. You ceded the argument. Facile empty statements like above dont advance a failed argument.
You must be using Mad Libs to write your comments, because none of what you just spouted is true. I'm guessing you didn't understand the argument in the first place. I'm not shocked.
 
You must be using Mad Libs to write your comments, because none of what you just spouted is true. I'm guessing you didn't understand the argument in the first place. I'm not shocked.
Your 'na huh' isnt a counter argument. If you're now here just for a participation trophy, let us know.

Feel free to quote any untruth from me, but this:

Everyone dies at some point, which doesn't mean that you purposefully killed them.

....is not a response to the OP.
 
The only way you could possibly know this is if you were once a pregnant woman who wanted to kill the embryo inside you. The objective facts of early abortion, at least, do not support a claim that the purpose is killing. So you have to explain why you think the purpose is killing or you lose this debate point.
 
Nope...it's not killing. These are very basic words that, for obvious reasons, ya'll are fake struggling with.
Spare me your moronic semantics game. Dead is dead and only a morally bankrupt asshole would split hairs how the death occurred when that death can be prevented.
 
Ugh. What is your definition of human? I believe life begins at conception. Do you know anyone who has had a miscarriage? Ask them if they thought that was a life inside of them that they lost. I'm no religious zealot but I do try to be the best human that I can, and I believe most abortion, mainly abortions of convenience where the two procreating adults were consenting but irresponsible, are wrong.
How about if they were just ****ing for fun and contraception fails?
 
How about if they were just ****ing for fun and contraception fails?
Like I said, abortions of convenience. Failing contraception or not, they knew what could happen by having sex. Everyone knows contraception isnt 100% effective.
 
Like I said, abortions of convenience.
When was the last time you did something because it was INCONVENIENT?

Failing contraception or not, they knew what could happen by having sex. Everyone knows contraception isnt 100% effective.
That is why abortion exists, as a last measure. Do you drive?
 
Ugh. What is your definition of human? I believe life begins at conception. Do you know anyone who has had a miscarriage? Ask them if they thought that was a life inside of them that they lost. I'm no religious zealot but I do try to be the best human that I can, and I believe most abortion, mainly abortions of convenience where the two procreating adults were consenting but irresponsible, are wrong.
Mighty CONVENIENT for you that YOUR body will never suffer the ravages of pregnancy and childbirth, isn't it?
 
Just curious. One might assume that you all would be.

Do you think people should be legally required to donate bone marrow if they are a match for someone who needs it?

Good thread.

The defensiveness of the prolifers in this thread is very telling. They refuse to confront the moral similarity between their anti-abortionism and their opposition to bone marrow registry mandates.

By their reasoning, and theirs alone, they are anti-life. Worse than that, but I'm not allowed to say it here.
 
Mighty CONVENIENT for you that YOUR body will never suffer the ravages of pregnancy and childbirth, isn't it?

Prolife men NEVER consider any inconveniences to their own bodies that would reduce the number of abortions. Ever.
 
Your 'na huh' isnt a counter argument. If you're now here just for a participation trophy, let us know.
The irony is that your comment was "nuh-uh" That's hilarious.
 
The only way you could possibly know this is if you were once a pregnant woman who wanted to kill the embryo inside you. The objective facts of early abortion, at least, do not support a claim that the purpose is killing. So you have to explain why you think the purpose is killing or you lose this debate point.
Nope....I could be a turtle and still know your that statement to be false. It's literally, and purposefully, killing.
 
Everyone dies at some point, which doesn't mean that you purposefully killed them.

The irony is that your comment was "nuh-uh" That's hilarious.
It was descriptive of your post. If I posted something that 'empty' and irrelevant to the topic, please quote it.

Maybe I did 🤷 Please correct me then, since my goal here is the discussion.
 
Nope....I could be a turtle and still know your that statement to be false. It's literally, and purposefully, killing.
You have to explain why you know that the purpose of the people who choose abortion is to kill, and you are not doing that.
 
You have to explain why you know that the purpose of the people who choose abortion is to kill, and you are not doing that.
Uhhh...that's like asking to explain why people need to eat to live. Abortion kills a living human every single time.
 
Uhhh...that's like asking to explain why people need to eat to live. Abortion kills a living human every single time.
So? Again, if women could abort without that result...dont you think they'd choose that? Of course they would.

Stick with the real definition, "abortion is the termination of a pregnancy."

The unborn dies, we know.
 
Uhhh...that's like asking to explain why people need to eat to live. Abortion kills a living human every single time.
The fact that abortion removing the placenta and embryo causes the embryo to die is not the same thing as killing the embryo. You indicated that the person who wanted an abortion wanted to kill. That is not the same intent as wanting to remove the placenta and embryo.
 
"anti-choice" really is the correct name for the liars.

COVID proved they aren't "pro-life".
 
The fact that abortion removing the placenta and embryo causes the embryo to die is not the same thing as killing the embryo.
That's almost the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

"The fact that someone dies because I removed oxygen from their air is not the same thing as killing them." - choiceone probably
 
Uhhh...that's like asking to explain why people need to eat to live. Abortion kills a living human every single time.
No, the pre-viable embryo or fetus dies every time. That does not equate to abortion killing.

You are saying that the person who is having or performing the abortion has an intent to kill.

I am saying that the person's intent is to stop the connection of the placenta/embryo to the woman's body and get it out of her body. That this results in death of the embryo is not the intent.

I'm perfectly willing to say that, in a case of abortion of rape pregnancy, the woman probably also intends to kill the embryo, as it carries the rapist's chromosomes and was polluting her body with them while she was pregnant. But most abortions do not involve that intention.
 
No, the pre-viable embryo or fetus dies every time. That does not equate to abortion killing.
^---That might be the most stupid thing I've read all year. You literally just contradicted yourself from your first second to your second.
 
Back
Top Bottom