Any of you righties want to weigh in on this tragic and heartbreaking story?

[Groogrux]

He would still have a job if not for dumpytits.

Nope sorry, not buying that because stuff like that was always handled in a reasonable manner in the past.

Not trying to sell you anything. He missed the cutoff, consequences followed. No one did him dirty.

 

[TangoNoCash]

Failed or failed to try?
If the latter I take issue because the Democrats HAVE tried repeatedly on all of the above.

I would answer failed for most of them.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

I would answer failed for most of them.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Not trying to sell you anything. He missed the cutoff, consequences followed. No one did him dirty.

My apologies.

I get carried away from time to time.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Russell Vought is on record as saying one goal of Project 2025 is to make Federal employees terrified.

AI Overview

• In a 2025 interview, Russell Vought, a key architect of Project 2025, made remarks suggesting a desire for bureaucrats to be "traumatized". "We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected," Vought said. "When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work, because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down...We want to put them in trauma".

Vought belongs in a cell for 20 years.

 

[LostInSeattle]

It's not an exit; I'm still here.

You challenged me to demonstrate there is more left bias (i.e., compliant with the left) media than right, and I provided evidence supporting that claim. You then decided to split semantic hairs in a -- get ready for it -- weak effort to defend your implied assertion that the bulk of mainstream media doesn't lean left.

Still challenged by reading comprehension, I see. Also, by words. Words have meanings that are not the same. Maybe invest in a thesaurus?

According to YOUR "evidence", the bulk of mainstream media has a left leaning perspective. That does NOT support your assertion that they are "compliant". I gave you examples of the difference between compliance and bias, and you called it "semantic hair-splitting," though you haven't explained why you think those are the same thing. I guess that's easier than admitting you're wrong, but whatever.


According to Wikipedia "The term "media bias" implies a pervasive or widespread bias contravening of the standards of journalism, rather than the perspective of an individual journalist or article." That far more accurately describes right leaning media than left. See Dominion v Fox News.

 

[NatMorton]

There are no left wing media tactics.

Hook line and sinker

As Boston Globe subscriber, you’ll never convince me of that.

 

[NatMorton]

That does NOT support your assertion that they are "compliant".

Yes, it absolutely does, and all you’re doing at this point is engaging in gainsaying nonsense.

And it’s more that a bit telling you seem to agree only with the right side of that AllSides chart. Why is that, exactly?

 

[noonereal]

As Boston Globe subscriber, you’ll never convince me of that.

Because you read with bias and dont know journalism from editorial

 

[NatMorton]

Because you read with bias and dont know journalism from editorial

You have no idea what you're talking about, though it's clear your profile pic is spot on.

 

[noonereal]

You have no idea what you're talking about, though it's clear your profile pic is spot on.

My wisdom would shock you and yes, profile pic is spot on.

 

[NatMorton]

My wisdom would shock you and yes, profile pic is spot on.

Yes, we're in agreement, your wisdom would shock me.