• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Any Information About A Democrat Favorite: Dave Van Zandt? (1 Viewer)

Who does fact checking trigger you so?

I love exposing Republicrat-level $hit... It's my thang...i looooooooove it... i suspect you are the triggered one here...
 
I sense you may have figured out the whereabouts of the real Dave!!!! (y)
I sense that it doesn't matter because where he is doesn't have any bearing on whether the site is legitimate or if he holds particular bias. He already stated he's an "unaffiliated voter in NC".
 
I sense that it doesn't matter...

I agree with that part... What I laugh at are the [mostly] Democrat cheerleaders who use 'Dave' as some 'minister of :poop: truth'... ugh...
 
I agree with that part... What I laugh at are the [mostly] Democrat cheerleaders who use 'Dave' as some 'minister of :poop: truth'... ugh...
Dave has evidence and provides it on his site for the ratings, reviews, descriptions he provides for each of those media sites. He supports his claims, info with facts, examples.

The fact that you assume he is a Democrat or leans that way (when he has stated differently) seems to say much more about your bias than his.
 
I love exposing Republicrat-level $hit... It's my thang...i looooooooove it... i suspect you are the triggered one here...

You love blithering about what you imagine is "Republicrat-level $hit".

Why does fact checking trigger you so?
 
CRAIG: "Panqui claims he throws a baseball 107 miles/hour."

Panqui: "Please provide your best evidence to support this ridiculous assertion."

CRAIG: "No, you provide the evidence."

:rolleyes:

False analogy, and by offering such a weak argument, the only inference is that you ARE admitting that you know you are lying. You will not say you think you are telling the truth. (I didn't suggest you are lying, I gave you the presumption you are not and just asked you to confirm when you argued with the presumption).
 
Can't find his birthdate.

I believe Roguenuke has 'identified' him....I believe his name is 'David E. Van Zandt'... I believe the other Dave's middle initial is 'M'....
 
Can't find his birthdate.
Don't think it's necessary. (Was that a question asked?)

The info from the bio on the media bias site about "Dave" indicates there's a strong possibility it's him. It says that he ended up getting a degree in Occupational Rehabilitation, which fits with the career of the guy in my link. It also fits the time he spent in that position, at 19 years, since the about page on media bias/fact check shows he was on a "20 year journey" after college. Then he also says he lives in NC, which is where that particular clinic is.
 
I believe Roguenuke has 'identified' him....I believe his name is 'David E. Van Zandt'... I believe the other Dave's middle initial is 'M'....
Switch those. David E Van Zandt is the guy who is not this guy.


Who in the heck is Dave Van Zandt?


Dave M. Van Zandt obtained a Communications Degree before pursuing a higher degree in the sciences. Dave currently works full time in the health care industry. For the record, he also is not the President of the New School; that is a different David E. Van Zandt, who is the head of a liberal college in New York City. I am an unaffiliated voter from North Carolina.
 
Don't think it's necessary. (Was that a question asked?)

The info from the bio on the media bias site about "Dave" indicates there's a strong possibility it's him. It says that he ended up getting a degree in Occupational Rehabilitation, which fits with the career of the guy in my link. It also fits the time he spent in that position, at 19 years, since the about page on media bias/fact check shows he was on a "20 year journey" after college. Then he also says he lives in NC, which is where that particular clinic is.
Do you want to ask him his birthday and if he's a potential Candidate, there's a contact form on the website.

Should I let him know?
 
Do you want to ask him his birthday and if he's a potential Candidate, there's a contact form on the website.
Nah. I trust him just fine. Why would I care what his birthday is? I also don't think he plans to get into politics, as he seems content just doing what he's doing. Happy in fact. I'd say he's in his late 40s, maybe up to mid 50s at oldest.
 
False analogy, and by offering such a weak argument, the only inference is that you ARE admitting that you know you are lying. You will not say you think you are telling the truth. (I didn't suggest you are lying, I gave you the presumption you are not and just asked you to confirm when you argued with the presumption).

:rolleyes:

Accurate analogy...

Haven't you figured out YET that 'politics' is LARGELY 'subjective'?! We are dwelling in the realm of BELIEF not 'TRUTH'... OF COURSE I truly believe my ideas/priorities/understandings are better than yours and I BELIEVE I am 'correct', etc.. [Just like YOU think you are 'right'] But I [unlike YOU apparently] understand I could be wrong! FFS!

REREAD the Russell quote!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom