No, they argue that the book is obviously intended to appear very, very similar to Palin's book, and that it causes market confusion because you do have to look very, very carefully to make sure you're getting the right one. That's the heart of trademark.
Do you think if you repeat it enough it might become true?
Because she is still relevant.
A large portion of the right adore her, and she's no less possible a GOP candidate than Romney, Gingrich or Huckabee.
And although we liberals love to laugh at her wacky antics, even I'll admit that after we saw Bush the Lesser elected twice, we don't put it past the wingnuts to try and vote in Miss Snowjob McSquareglasses.
I hate that bitch with every cell of my body.
why is the other book "crap" ? Have you read it ? Is there anything that is not true in it ? Are you saying that the other book's writers/publishers do not a have right to write ? Last that I checked this was a free country unless Nixon is back in office!!
I didn't know public figures really needed to sign releases. I thought it was implied at such events and with such people. I can see her suing to remove the image from the work but then what? They can find an image by somebody who does have a release form, change the hue on her jacket and presto.
It's a smear piece. Any smear piece is a piece of crap. I don't care who it's written about.
Last time I checked, I have the right to judge any smear piece as a piece of crap. Just excercising my freedoms, as well. Surely you understand.
It's a smear piece. Any smear piece is a piece of crap. I don't care who it's written about.
Last time I checked, I have the right to judge any smear piece as a piece of crap. Just excercising my freedoms, as well. Surely you understand.
I don't mind the criticism of her but the method seems a little unduly malicious. It seems more and more like people are just picking on her for the sake of picking on her.
Well she is not exactly a squeeky virgin when it comes to picking on others is she. Ask her Bro-IN -Law, ask the Community Organizer, Bill Ayer's acquantance aka BoRak, ask her Almost was-a-son-in-law, and who ones who else she picked on.
I don't mind the criticism of her but the method seems a little unduly malicious. It seems more and more like people are just picking on her for the sake of picking on her.
I don't know. I mean if you buy a replica of the Mona Lisa because it looks similar to the real image and argue that you thought you were buying the real thing at $64 at a Target no judge will take you seriously. It's up to the customer to check the merchandise and if he/she doesn't think he's got the right product they can always return it.
Welcome to politics
I don't like Palin and want her to go away, but I'll admit that the person doing the piece against her used a dirty trick, and I hate dirty politics.
I think what it really boils down to, is that the Libbos won't allow the Republicans to put the first woman president in the White House. Can you imagine the trash talk that PBO would have endured if had been a Conservative? The Libbos would have called him everything from Uncle Tom to porch monkey.
Why does a a book that very likley tells the truth about a quiter constitute an exemplification of a threat ?
The left is still paying attention to her.
That much alone speaks volumes.
We still laugh at her, yes.
We still laugh at her, yes.
We still laugh at her, yes.
I think that's great, keep it going, she needs the media exposure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?