• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anti-Abortion Group Calls for Removal of ‘Satanic' Shahzia Sikander Sculpture in Texas

Gordy327

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Messages
22,715
Reaction score
18,779
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Source:

A Shahzia Sikander sculpture has become the subject of controversy after a powerful anti-abortion group claimed that the work promotes "satanic" imagery.
The sculpture, which was acclaimed by critics when it appeared in New York's Madison Square Park last year, was intended to explore the relationship between femininity and power.

Titled Witness (2023), the work features a female figure who levitates above the ground, her arms and legs dissolving into root-like forms. She dons the armature of a hoop skirt that contains mosaics depicting plants. She dons a lacy collar in allusion to similar ones worn by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the late Supreme Court justice.

Sikander has said that the work, which debuted alongside another sculpture, was, in part, a response to the paring back of abortion rights in the United States, including the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade.

...Earlier this month, Texas Right to Life, a self-described "pro-life" organization that has been credited with helping to undo Roe v. Wade, claimed the work enlists "satanic imagery to honor abortion and memorialize the late Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg," although it did not describe what that imagery was. (Sikander's artist statement about the work contains no mention of satanism.)

---Continued---
 
Last edited by a moderator:
---Continued---

Axios reported that Texas Right to Life had been referring to a booklet about Witness published by the Madison Square Park Conservancy that mentioned Abrahamic religions, which refer to horned beings.

"The trope is not the artist's alone: horned gods and goddesses abound in world religions, from ancient Egypt and Greece to other parts and eras of Africa and Europe. In the Abrahamic faiths the horned beast is associated with forces of evil, chaos, and destruction-the devil himself," critic Aruna D'Souza writes in the booklet.

...In an FAQ about Witness, the University of Houston acknowledged that the work might be "offensive to some people," and said, "The sculpture has braids shaped like ram horns, representing the unification of disparate strands. Ram horns have significance in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as well as Central and South Asian beliefs, often associated with power and valor. The artist has said the braids link to one of her paintings that represents the courage, fluidity and resilience of the feminine."

The Sikander sculpture is the latest in a series of artworks that have been labeled "satanic" by right-wing groups. Others include performances by Marina Abramović and a Simone Leigh sculpture that temporarily appeared in the former site of a Robert E. Lee monument in New Orleans.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The takeaway from this is, anti-abortionists consider anything honoring or respecting a woman's right to choose and bodily autonomy to be satanic. Shows how screwed up their priorities are.
 
The takeaway from this is, anti-abortionists consider anything honoring or respecting a woman's right to choose and bodily autonomy to be satanic. Shows how screwed up their priorities are.

Sounds about right. Love the new avatar pic, btw.
 
So, just for fun let's pretend for a moment that it IS what they say it is.

So what?
 
So, just for fun let's pretend for a moment that it IS what they say it is.

So what?
It would then seem certain theistic minded individuals or groups have no sense of humor. The fact that they get in such a tizzy over a rather innocuous sculpture only demonstrates that, which is funny in itself.
 
Why do they think this looks Satanic?

AA19IIBp.img

This does not look Satanic. And pretty evident those aren't horns. Also Satan do not really have horns, that's a Western cultural thing probably because Satan merged with Pan for some reason.
 
Why do they think this looks Satanic?

AA19IIBp.img

This does not look Satanic. And pretty evident those aren't horns. Also Satan do not really have horns, that's a Western cultural thing probably because Satan merged with Pan for some reason.
She's sporting Princess Leia's bad hair day 😆
 
Hava+2.jpg


The full statue. Looks pretty cool. if I were still playing 40K that would be a great CTan mini.
 
So it looks like the talk was cancelled, but the statute is remaining at UH until its planned transfer in October.

As a UH alumni, I can safely so no one cares.
 
Back
Top Bottom