Animal Farm by George Orwell
AHA! So this is why you keep ignoring questions, and spewing the same lies over and over and over, ad nauseum.
HAW! HAW!! HAW!!! Indeed, your stance has never been ambiguous. But it has never been right, either! To be a correct stance, it needs to be based on all the relevant data. But since you ignore important/relevant Scientific Facts, it is literally impossible for your stance to be correct.
Ah, so we have another Abortion Opponent here, who is ignorant of relevant Facts. It is a LIE to call an unborn human a "human being", exactly because it is a lie to call an ordinary cockroach a "cockroach being". Consider such entities as "rocks" or "trees" or "bacteria" --all exist and HAVE "being" but none are ever called "rock beings" or "tree beings" or "bacterium beings". On the other hand, we DO sometimes talk about "alien beings", "intelligent beings", "extraterrestrial beings", and even "artificial intelligence beings". We are talking about a PERSON when we attach the word "being" to an entity-designation. Unborn humans are, in actual Measurable Scientific Fact, totally unable to qualify as a person (because infant humans also fail to qualify, we can measure them more easily, and it is well known, even by Abortion Opponents, that the unborn are less-developed than infants --even human infants have less mental abilities than many ordinary/mere animals --so if you are going to grant person status to unborn humans, by calling them "human beings", why don't you also grant person status to wolves, by calling them "wolf beings"?.
I see you still don't know how to read. I wasn't describing your response to loaded questions\, I was describing your response to almost any question, which is why I didn't quote all that you wrote.
FALSE. Among your other ignorances, you also don't know the actual correct way to deal with a loaded question. The correct way is, after claiming that the question is loaded, to point out exactly how it is a loaded question. The mere claim that it is loaded is worthless without evidence!
You are missing a couple of stages, "morula" and "blastocyst". The correct abbreviated sequence is ZMBEF.
You are missing a couple of stages, "morula" and "blastocyst". The correct abbreviated sequence is ZMBEF.
Me, I typically use the phrase "unborn human". It covers all the stages, doesn't take up a lot of space, and nobody can complain that I am de-humanizing the unborn.
Actually, we don't abort zygotes, either, except maybe in a lab, playing with sperm and eggs. However, in a lab it is also possible to abort morulas and blastocysts, so.... (meanwhile, actually, the "morning after" pill works by preventing a blastocyst from implanting in a womb, so while that doesn't exactly qualify as "aborting" it, there is a pretty important interaction with it).
No, one would have to use the phrase "unborn human being" to equate it with a person. And you might have noticed that I strongly object to such usage; I do frequently specify "unborn human animal", or "unborn human animal organism", in fact.
We may be talking about two different "morning after pills". Do keep in mind that it takes more than 3 days for a zygote to become a blastocyst, which then attempts to implant into a womb. If a morning-after pill is literally taken the morning after, the most logical effect would be to prevent the implantation of the blastocyst. But if you have a different drug that can be taken say, a week after, then, OK, you would be dislodging/aborting an already-implanted blastocyst --except at that, according to the naming conventions, once a blastocyst implants, it ceases to be called a blastocyst; it is now an "embryo".
Nope; I am at least partly correct. First, though, I'll mention that there is another category of "morning after pill", which I had neglected to remember while writing my last post here. This type of pill is intended to prevent ovulation, and therefore can prevent conception. However, it is obviously useless if ovulation has already occurred! Unless some variety of morning-after pill can prevent womb-implantation. And it happens that there is one:
The evidence therefore indicate that it is you, just like most Abortion Opponents, who is ignorant of the current subject.Wikipedia article on mifepristone said:
Anything taken out of context can be made to look stupid.
