• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ANOTHER Judge Rules Democrats violated election law.

Right, they're trying to make voting and registration easier, or the opposite of that the THUG party are doing all across the country. The THUG party knows they lose when voter participation is high, so they are trying to keep that from happening.

What percent of the 7+ billion residents of the planet do you recommend vote in our elections?
 
What percent of the 7+ billion residents of the planet do you recommend vote in our elections?
I think it should be easy for citizens of this country to register and cast votes.
 
The Democrat-Socialists law breaking as the means to their ends is getting revealed. Too late to do anything about the last election theft.

Hopefully, this might impact future elections.

<snip>
State Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray has ruled invalid Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's guidance issued to Michigan clerks in early October
<snip>
"The presumption is found nowhere in state law," wrote Murray, an appointee of Republican former Gov. John Engler. "The mandatory presumption goes beyond the realm of mere advice and direction, and instead is a substantive directive that adds to the pertinent signature-matching standards."

How'd this only help Democrats?
 
How'd this only help Democrats?

It is almost certainly true that anything run by lying thieves is prone to be unfair and dishonest.

Our elections are run by our politicians. Our politicians are lying thieves. As a result, our elections are almost certainly prone to be unfair and dishonest.

The lack of fairness and dishonesty is not exclusive to either party. BOTH major American Political Parties, ALL political parties, at all levels are prima facia biased and committed to self interest.

If the goal is self interest, the means will reflect that and the ends achieved will also reflect that.

Elections must be guided by rules and certifications that impede the corruption to the greatest extent possible.

This would start with assuring that only those qualified to vote are allowed to submit ballots.
 
It is almost certainly true that anything run by lying thieves is prone to be unfair and dishonest.

Our elections are run by our politicians. Our politicians are lying thieves. As a result, our elections are almost certainly prone to be unfair and dishonest.

The lack of fairness and dishonesty is not exclusive to either party. BOTH major American Political Parties, ALL political parties, at all levels are prima facia biased and committed to self interest.

If the goal is self interest, the means will reflect that and the ends achieved will also reflect that.

Elections must be guided by rules and certifications that impede the corruption to the greatest extent possible.

This would start with assuring that only those qualified to vote are allowed to submit ballots.
Are you suggesting that REGISTRATION processes are deficient? In which state?
 
I think it should be easy for citizens of this country to register and cast votes.
It certainly should be but the government, the Democrats anyway, think their supporters are too stupid or lazy to get ID. It would certainly speed up the process if they did, as well as keep it honest.
 
It certainly should be but the government, the Democrats anyway, think their supporters are too stupid or lazy to get ID. It would certainly speed up the process if they did, as well as keep it honest.
/// as well as keep it honest. /// Hello. Georgia!? Trump here. Find me 11,000 votes!... :rolleyes:
 
It would certainly speed up the process if they did, as well as keep it honest.
There's no evidence that it has ever been anything but honest. Voter ID is a solution to a problem what has never existed.
 
There's no evidence that it has ever been anything but honest. Voter ID is a solution to a problem what has never existed.
That's just false and even the slightest bit of investigation would prove it.
 
That's just false and even the slightest bit of investigation would prove it.
If it required even the slightest bit of investigation, then I guess it would be right up your alley.

No amount of investigation, not even a tsunami of investigation, has ever revealed widespread voter fraud of the type that would alter a national election. Ever. Period. A solution to a problem that has never existed. And here in the land of the free, and the home of the 50 different states, there will never be a single national standard for elections. They will always be state run and funded, and will never be uniform across the country -

- at least not until the successful reemergence of the Confederacy, when the South will no doubt establish an autocracy that forces the same election laws on all of their states, and effectively blocks the minority vote.
;)
 
If it required even the slightest bit of investigation, then I guess it would be right up your alley.

No amount of investigation, not even a tsunami of investigation, has ever revealed widespread voter fraud of the type that would alter a national election. Ever. Period. A solution to a problem that has never existed. And here in the land of the free, and the home of the 50 different states, there will never be a single national standard for elections. They will always be state run and funded, and will never be uniform across the country -

- at least not until the successful reemergence of the Confederacy, when the South will no doubt establish an autocracy that forces the same election laws on all of their states, and effectively blocks the minority vote.
;)
Yes, unlike leftists, I do like to investigate before making claims.

How can you say something doesn't exist when you have done no research whatsoever? You now admit that voter fraud exists but not "of the type that would alter a national election". And how do you know this? Did someone at the New York Times or other MSM tell you that? Project Veritas has already exposed some of the MSM lies with more to come. US media has become a Fifth Column and far too many leftists unquestioningly just suck it up.
 
Yes, unlike leftists, I do like to investigate before making claims.

How can you say something doesn't exist when you have done no research whatsoever? You now admit that voter fraud exists but not "of the type that would alter a national election". And how do you know this? Did someone at the New York Times or other MSM tell you that? Project Veritas has already exposed some of the MSM lies with more to come. US media has become a Fifth Column and far too many leftists unquestioningly just suck it up.
Oh PUH-LEEEZE! Don't distort what I wrote. During my entire long life, every time the proto-fascists are disappointed with the results of an election, they "investigate" - and find nothing! NOTHING !! No evidence of widespread voter fraud of the type they insist their policies are trying to avoid has ever been documented anywhere in the country. E . V . E. R. !! If it had, you'd be producing it right now. You assert that you "do like to investigate before making claims." !!??!! Really ?? Then didn't you investigate? Where the hell is your evidence to the contrary?

Oh. You don't have any . . . . . because it simply doesn't exist!

It's been recognized for more than 20 years now that the only type of voter fraud capable of swaying a national election is "black box" voter fraud - where a hacked computer system changes election results en masse. No amount of voter ID witch hunting will have any impact on that at all, and you'll never do away with mail-in voting, which doesn't require it.

It's a new millennium. Try to catch up to the 21st century.
 
Back
Top Bottom