• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Another Great Step forward for the Pro-Choice crowd

DeeJayH

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
11,728
Reaction score
1,689
Location
Scooping Zeus' Poop
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Yale Daily News - For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourse

Art major Aliza Shvarts '08 wants to make a statement.
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself "as often as possible" while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts' project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock . saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.
But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for "shock value."

may she bleed out and die, or be rendered sterile by her atrocious acts
****ing trash

pro-choice side must be so proud and what they have reaped
 
If I support gun rights, am I to apologise for every shooting?

Tell me? Do you believe freedom of speech was invented to protect Mickey Mouse or the KKK?

Freedom means the freedom to do wrong, supporting that freedom does not in any way mean one supports how another uses it.

One can be morally opposed to abortion, and be for the liberty to have one. You argument here is tantamount to crediting a man's blathering to free-speech advocates.

Abortions are wrong, but to use force in order to stop them would be much worse. Being pro-choice, I will not apologize for this moron anymore than I will a murderer because I am pro-gun rights.
 
Last edited:
Yale Daily News - For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourse

may she bleed out and die, or be rendered sterile by her atrocious acts
****ing trash

pro-choice side must be so proud and what they have reaped

The pro-choice side is not to blame for abortions taking place; they took place with regularity before they were decriminalized. It is unfortunate that this woman used the abortion controversy to gain notoriety, making a public spectacle of a private matter. It is sad for her that she felt compelled to use her body in such a destructive fashion.
 
Yale Daily News - For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourse



may she bleed out and die, or be rendered sterile by her atrocious acts
****ing trash

pro-choice side must be so proud and what they have reaped

After thinking on it a bit I don't believe she really had abortions as it isn't that easy to get pregnant with a turkey baster, especially repetitively, and none of her pregnancies were confirmed. I actually kind of think she's full of crap and just trying to rile everyone up to get people screaming that this is an outrage. If that's the case you almost have to bet she's a prolifer, because there would be no benefit to the prochoice side. I do so want her to be a nutty prochoicer but I'm betting she's a goof from my own side. It just doesn't make sense for a prochoicer to do such a thing. It also doesn't seem logistically credible that she did such a thing.

Clearly she's a nut but I wouldn't bet against her being one of my sides nuts vs. one of the others.
 
After thinking on it a bit I don't believe she really had abortions as it isn't that easy to get pregnant with a turkey baster, especially repetitively, and none of her pregnancies were confirmed. I actually kind of think she's full of crap and just trying to rile everyone up to get people screaming that this is an outrage. If that's the case you almost have to bet she's a prolifer, because there would be no benefit to the prochoice side. I do so want her to be a nutty prochoicer but I'm betting she's a goof from my own side. It just doesn't make sense for a prochoicer to do such a thing. It also doesn't seem logistically credible that she did such a thing.

Clearly she's a nut but I wouldn't bet against her being one of my sides nuts vs. one of the others.
Very true. We constantly have people out there that purposely rub others the wrong way for the simple purpose of 15 minutes of fame...or infame. This just reeks of attention-grabbing.

Just call her an attention-seeking whore.
 
Well, this is thoroughly disgusting. Heh. But if I were going to blame it on someone, I'd start with the NEA long before I'd start looking at NARAL.

Seems too many people have forgotten the difference between legitimately evocative art and mere shock value.
 
Pro-Lifers have been using the pictures of a developing fetus in picketing abortion clinics, as a means of arguing, "It's a Baby, not a choice!"

Perhaps an art category of Family Planning could encourage the development of more artful and tasteful depictions of a beautiful side of the contraceptive and abortive processes of family planning.


..
 
After thinking on it a bit I don't believe she really had abortions as it isn't that easy to get pregnant with a turkey baster, especially repetitively, and none of her pregnancies were confirmed. I actually kind of think she's full of crap and just trying to rile everyone up to get people screaming that this is an outrage. If that's the case you almost have to bet she's a prolifer, because there would be no benefit to the prochoice side. I do so want her to be a nutty prochoicer but I'm betting she's a goof from my own side. It just doesn't make sense for a prochoicer to do such a thing. It also doesn't seem logistically credible that she did such a thing.

Clearly she's a nut but I wouldn't bet against her being one of my sides nuts vs. one of the others.
partially right

ti was a Hoax
 
After thinking on it a bit I don't believe she really had abortions as it isn't that easy to get pregnant with a turkey baster, especially repetitively, and none of her pregnancies were confirmed. I actually kind of think she's full of crap and just trying to rile everyone up to get people screaming that this is an outrage. If that's the case you almost have to bet she's a prolifer, because there would be no benefit to the prochoice side. I do so want her to be a nutty prochoicer but I'm betting she's a goof from my own side. It just doesn't make sense for a prochoicer to do such a thing. It also doesn't seem logistically credible that she did such a thing.

Clearly she's a nut but I wouldn't bet against her being one of my sides nuts vs. one of the others.




Even if so, she is a loon and anyone who thinks this is "Art" or "cool" or whatnot needs to do a moral checkfire.
 
So this has been revealed as a hoax, as it obviously was. The woman is insane to make such a thing up, clearly.
 
Back
Top Bottom