President Donald Trump is continuing to wage battle against interpretations of history which he claims are un-American.
In a Sunday morning tweet, the President said the US Department of Education would investigate whether California schools are using the New York Times' "1619 Project" in public school curriculum. The Pulitzer-Prize winning collection reframes American history around the date of August 1619, when the first slave ship arrived on America's shores.
"Department of Education is looking at this. If so, they will not be funded!" he wrote on Twitter, citing a message from an unverified account saying it was being taught in schools there.
Aren't we tired of having a racist president? I suspect most of us are.
Trump says Department of Education will investigate use of 1619 Project in schools - CNNPolitics
So, yesterday he said diversity training was un-American. Today, teaching about slavery is.
Does this man even have a bottom?
Aren't we tired of having a racist president? I suspect most of us are.
Trump says Department of Education will investigate use of 1619 Project in schools - CNNPolitics
So, yesterday he said diversity training was un-American. Today, teaching about slavery is.
Does this man even have a bottom?
Ben Shapiro says the 1619 Project is pseudohistory, doesn't belong in school curriculums
Ben Shapiro says the 1619 Project is pseudohistory, doesn'''t belong in school curriculums
Legitimate questions to ask:
[URL="https://www.heritage.org/american-founders/commentary/pulitzer-overlooks-egregious-errors-award-prize-new-york-times-fatally"]
- Why this curious persistence in supporting a “project” with so many defects?
- Among the most egregious errors are the claims that the American Revolution was designed to protect slavery.
- These are all matters of enormous historical complexity, but they are treated by the 1619 Project with a wave of the hand and no research.
Pulitzer Overlooks Egregious Errors to Award Prize to New York Times’ Fatally Flawed "1619 Project"
The 1691 project is a distortion of US history bent to support a political ideology and a preferred political narrative, so it is little more than ideologically driven political propaganda, '1984 Ministry of Truth', anyone?
The fact that it won the 2020 Pulitzer Prize only shows how politically based the Pulitzer committee has become, no longer judging on quality journalism (given the errors in the 1619 project), and judging on political ideology.
The Pulitzer committee has relegated themselves to judging and promoting political propaganda.
The 1619 project shouldn't be used for any educations purposes.
Since when has political propaganda been used for 'education' purposes?
Using it for education purposes is nothing but liberal / progressive indoctrination in the education system, which must be excised with belligerence from the education system.
www.nationalreview.com › 2019/10 › new-york-times-...
New York Times '1619 Project' Distorts the History of Slavery ...
Oct 7, 2019 - Slave shackles on display at the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Kevin Lamarque/ ...
www.washingtontimes.com › news › may › editorial-16...
Revisionists at it again: The '1619 Project' is bad history fueled by bad motives
May 24, 2020 - So, let's call the 1619 Project and its use in our public schools what it is: An attempt ... of university students were indoctrinated to interpret American history as an ... Neither party cares that the dissemination of their distortion of ...
Legitimate questions to ask:
The 1691 project is a distortion of US history bent to support a political ideology and a preferred political narrative, so it is little more than ideologically driven political propaganda, '1984 Ministry of Truth', anyone?
The fact that it won the 2020 Pulitzer Prize only shows how politically based the Pulitzer committee has become, no longer judging on quality journalism (given the errors in the 1619 project), and judging on political ideology.
The Pulitzer committee has relegated themselves to judging and promoting political propaganda.
The 1619 project shouldn't be used for any educations purposes.
Since when has political propaganda been used for 'education' purposes?
Using it for education purposes is nothing but liberal / progressive indoctrination in the education system, which must be excised with belligerence from the education system.
www.nationalreview.com › 2019/10 › new-york-times-...
New York Times '1619 Project' Distorts the History of Slavery ...
Oct 7, 2019 - Slave shackles on display at the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Kevin Lamarque/ ...
www.washingtontimes.com › news › may › editorial-16...
Revisionists at it again: The '1619 Project' is bad history fueled by bad motives
May 24, 2020 - So, let's call the 1619 Project and its use in our public schools what it is: An attempt ... of university students were indoctrinated to interpret American history as an ... Neither party cares that the dissemination of their distortion of ...
Legitimate questions to ask:
The 1691 project is a distortion of US history bent to support a political ideology and a preferred political narrative, so it is little more than ideologically driven political propaganda, '1984 Ministry of Truth', anyone?
The fact that it won the 2020 Pulitzer Prize only shows how politically based the Pulitzer committee has become, no longer judging on quality journalism (given the errors in the 1619 project), and judging on political ideology.
The Pulitzer committee has relegated themselves to judging and promoting political propaganda.
The 1619 project shouldn't be used for any educations purposes.
Since when has political propaganda been used for 'education' purposes?
Using it for education purposes is nothing but liberal / progressive indoctrination in the education system, which must be excised with belligerence from the education system.
www.nationalreview.com › 2019/10 › new-york-times-...
New York Times '1619 Project' Distorts the History of Slavery ...
Oct 7, 2019 - Slave shackles on display at the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Kevin Lamarque/ ...
www.washingtontimes.com › news › may › editorial-16...
Revisionists at it again: The '1619 Project' is bad history fueled by bad motives
May 24, 2020 - So, let's call the 1619 Project and its use in our public schools what it is: An attempt ... of university students were indoctrinated to interpret American history as an ... Neither party cares that the dissemination of their distortion of ...
Legitimate questions to ask:
The 1691 project is a distortion of US history bent to support a political ideology and a preferred political narrative, so it is little more than ideologically driven political propaganda, '1984 Ministry of Truth', anyone?
The fact that it won the 2020 Pulitzer Prize only shows how politically based the Pulitzer committee has become, no longer judging on quality journalism (given the errors in the 1619 project), and judging on political ideology.
The Pulitzer committee has relegated themselves to judging and promoting political propaganda.
Aren't we tired of having a racist president? I suspect most of us are.
Trump says Department of Education will investigate use of 1619 Project in schools - CNNPolitics
So, yesterday he said diversity training was un-American. Today, teaching about slavery is.
Does this man even have a bottom?
Fair enough. That is where the responsibility lies.Take it up with your state of board of education...
And the state is where the responsibility should lie.The federal government has no power to set curriculum...
Nope.However, I am in full support of giving the federal government that power... I'm sure the Biden/Harris administration will be happy to review a few states curriculum like Texas... :2razz: Can we count on your support?
Aren't we tired of having a racist president? I suspect most of us are.
Trump says Department of Education will investigate use of 1619 Project in schools - CNNPolitics
So, yesterday he said diversity training was un-American. Today, teaching about slavery is.
Does this man even have a bottom?
Good! There's absolutely know reason that garbage should be taught in schools.
Good! There's absolutely know reason that garbage should be taught in schools.
After all, why do kids need to know about slavery? That's ancient history now, after all. Maybe we can repeat it if no one knows about it.
Good! There's absolutely know reason that garbage should be taught in schools.
I am going to enjoy the debates here when the Biden/Harris administration starts reviewing the curriculum for southern states.... :2razz:
So wrong in so many ways” is how Gordon Wood, the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian of the American Revolution, characterized the New York Times’s “1619 Project.” James McPherson, dean of Civil War historians and another Pulitzer winner, said the Times presented an “unbalanced, one-sided account” that “left most of the history out.” Even more surprising than the criticism from these generally liberal historians was where the interviews appeared: on the World Socialist Web Site, run by the Trotskyist Socialist Equality Party.
The “1619 Project” was launched in August with a 100-page spread in the Times’s Sunday magazine. It intends to “reframe the country’s history” by crossing out 1776 as America’s founding date and substituting 1619, the year 20 or so African slaves were brought to Jamestown, Va. The project has been celebrated up and down the liberal establishment, praised by Sen. Kamala Harris and Mayor Pete Buttigieg.
A September essay for the World Socialist Web Site called the project a “racialist falsification” of history. That didn’t get much attention, but in November the interviews with the historians went viral. “I wish my books would have this kind of reaction,” Mr. Wood says in an email. “It still strikes me as amazing why the NY Times would put its authority behind a project that has such weak scholarly support.” He adds that fellow historians have privately expressed their agreement. Mr. McPherson coolly describes the project’s “implicit position that there have never been any good white people, thereby ignoring white radicals and even liberals who have supported racial equality.”
The ‘1619 Project’ Gets Schooled - WSJ
But you probably want God taught in school. Mary was not a virgin and will that 3rd day come on already?
And you would be wrong. Any more lies? Any more anti-Christian bigotry?
How do you feel about Islam being taught in school?
Public schools struggle with lessons about Islam amid renewed fears of terrorism - Los Angeles Times
I believe all religion exploits people looking for something in their life they believe is missing. The Catholic church has been an on-going issue with the raping boys stuff.
Even if the information contained in the is a lie? You don't care. Right?
I am too, when the lies contained in the 1619 Project are exposed...
History, accurate history, isn't a friend to the Left.
Why else would they continuously try to re-write it?
Why else would they continuously try to re-write it?
Tell a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Tell a lie often enough, it becomes the truth.
Even Islam?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?