She encourages conservatives to be unapologetically conservative.
She has a brilliant legal mind.
She is painfully accurate about many things.
Example: When Bill Mahr had one of his 4-on-1, interruption-fest gangbangs against Coulter about Bush not jumping up and frightening school kids when he was told about 9/11, she said, "My problem with that whole thing was that we had a president reading to a bunch of school kids in the first place. I'm not the one who gave women the right to vote."
He WAS reading to school kids to pander to the female vote-which was her point. Presidents are supposed to execute laws, defend the country...not fix education systems.
She understands the Constitution-THAT is what makes her seem so controversial.
Yes, she is hostile to the left. Someone should be. The difference between her and, say, James Carville, is that she has substance and logic behind her points. I largely support her work.
Also, as part of that academic award-winning research I did on liberal media bias, I read Al Franken and Eric Alterman. They both spend almost all their time attacking OPINION JOURNALISTS instead of supposedly OBJECTIVE JOURNALISTS like, say, Katie Couric. But that's really a side point. Franken particularly attacks Coulter, and quite harshly, so I checked everything Franken wrote about Coulter in his newest book against Lexis Nexis and vice versa. Guess what?
I spent forty pages citing one egregious distortion/flat out lie of Franken's after another. I included copies from Nexis to prove what he was pulling. As usual, the laughably petty, smear-tactic arguments against her were exactly the kind of hysterical, dishonest liberal screeching she writes about.
People need people like Coulter. She is the only one bothering to remind us of all the evidence we've seen that liberals control our media and side with every enemy this nation has.