This is a little disappointing because I thought Andrea Mitchell was one of the more balanced ones
GOP Rep. Sean Duffy Demands Andrea Mitchell Defend Democrats Keeping Obamacare Perks - YouTube
Whether you like it or not, the president is the news and is reported as such during news breaks and evening news ...but discussing the news is called commentary and opinion.This is a little disappointing because I thought Andrea Mitchell was one of the more balanced ones
GOP Rep. Sean Duffy Demands Andrea Mitchell Defend Democrats Keeping Obamacare Perks - YouTube
Which has absolutely nothing to do with her acting like a shill for the Administration.Whether you like it or not, the president is the news and is reported as such during news breaks and evening news ...but discussing the news is called commentary and opinion.
Along with reporting straight news, Andrea Mitchell also hosts a news commentary opinion program. She often invites guests with opposing views, so she can ask the hard questions from the opposing side. Whereas, FoxNews hosts only seems to invite guests they agree with. So which commentary program do you think is more balanced? I lean toward the former.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with her acting like a shill for the Administration.
There is news and there are debate shows. Andrea Mitchell was not on a debate show, that was supposed to be an interview, she just couldn't help herself.Whether you like it or not, the president is the news and is reported as such during news breaks and evening news ...but discussing the news is called commentary and opinion.
Along with reporting straight news, Andrea Mitchell also hosts a news commentary opinion program. She often invites guests with opposing views, so she can ask the hard questions from the opposing side. Whereas, FoxNews hosts only seems to invite guests they agree with. So which commentary program do you think is more balanced? I lean toward the former.
That's ALL you saw in that seven minute clip?Who was Rep. Duffy shilling for? The Kochs?
DUFFY: You were asking me about the larger issue of why can’t people resolve this government shutdown. And we have been incredibly reasonable, making a small ask. And if the president doesn’t like what we’ve….
MITCHELL: Do you consider it a small ask that he get rid of the central part of his health care plan that was upheld by the vote of a presidential election and the United States Supreme Court?
DUFFY: Andrea, hold on. That’s your spin.
MITCHELL: That’s not spin.
Mitchell is right, thats not spin. It's fact.
Whether you like it or not, the president is the news and is reported as such during news breaks and evening news ...but discussing the news is called commentary and opinion.
Along with reporting straight news, Andrea Mitchell also hosts a news commentary opinion program. She often invites guests with opposing views, so she can ask the hard questions from the opposing side. Whereas, FoxNews hosts only seems to invite guests they agree with. So which commentary program do you think is more balanced? I lean toward the former.
She's an ugly hag. Deceitful lying witch
Glad I could clear that up for you
She's an ugly hag. Deceitful lying witch
She's actually a very nice lady. All the attention is helping to raise the ratings on her show. lol
So if someone in the media repeats the presidents position on negotions that makes them a shill? Really? It was perfectly valid for Mitchell to question Duffy on the president's position.That's ALL you saw in that seven minute clip?
Anyway, that was spin. Everything the president does cannot be defended simply on the basis of winning an election.
And his second election was not about Obamacare. If you remember, his campaign played it as a wash being that he was running against Romneycare. His handlers avoided Obamacare during the election so there is absolutely no mandate on that.
That's besides the fact that the public is just now learning what it's all about.
But to get back on topic, That bit about "the central part of his health care plan that was upheld by the vote of a presidential election" was a talking point he himself used last week.
She's repeating the administration's soundbytes for crying out loud.
The Kochs?Who was Rep. Duffy shilling for? The Kochs?
Shilling?Who was Rep. Duffy shilling for?
That isn't what she was doing.It was perfectly valid for Mitchell to question Duffy on the president's position.
This is a little disappointing because I thought Andrea Mitchell was one of the more balanced ones
GOP Rep. Sean Duffy Demands Andrea Mitchell Defend Democrats Keeping Obamacare Perks - YouTube
Who was Rep. Duffy shilling for? The Kochs?
DUFFY: You were asking me about the larger issue of why can’t people resolve this government shutdown. And we have been incredibly reasonable, making a small ask. And if the president doesn’t like what we’ve….
MITCHELL: Do you consider it a small ask that he get rid of the central part of his health care plan that was upheld by the vote of a presidential election and the United States Supreme Court?
DUFFY: Andrea, hold on. That’s your spin.
MITCHELL: That’s not spin.
Mitchell is right, thats not spin. It's fact.
So if someone in the media repeats the presidents position on negotions that makes them a shill? Really? It was perfectly valid for Mitchell to question Duffy on the president's position.
You act like Obama isn't even the president and everything he says is illigitimate and has no bearing or opinion on the matter. That kind of ignorant disrespect is akin to birtherism.
Remember it takes two sides to negotiate....not one side saying they won't destroy the country, if the other side submits to all their outrageous demands.
You sound like you actually have an understanding of the ACA, most people who are against it think it's an all encompassing, inescapable entity that we will all be using.I dislike the way Duffy views Obamacare. Well, duh. But, I mean, the way he talks about it, I am not "in Obamacare" because I'm not buying my insurance on the exchange. Like the president, like most Americans, my insurance comes through my employer. Still, the insurance my employer can offer is very much affected by Obamacare. The ACA affects a huge number of things in healthcare outside of the exchanges.
I don't think Andrea Mitchell is a shill, I actually think she's professional. What she is is biased, as we all are, but shouldn't let her bias bleed into a straight interview.So if someone in the media repeats the presidents position on negotions that makes them a shill? Really? It was perfectly valid for Mitchell to question Duffy on the president's position.
You act like Obama isn't even the president and everything he says is illigitimate and has no bearing or opinion on the matter. That kind of ignorant disrespect is akin to birtherism.
Remember it takes two sides to negotiate....not one side saying they won't destroy the country, if the other side submits to all their outrageous demands.
Worth repeatingDoes anyone think that progressive taxation has anything to do with equal treatment under the law? Does anyone think that the estate tax has anything to do with equal treatment under the law? Does anyone think that the welfare programs they support have anything to do with equal treatment under the law? From what I can tell the only time they care about equal treatment under the law is when the government can push people around.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?