Hilariously disingenuous from an Obama/Holder/Lynch apologist...
I've said it before and I will say it again. If that's the hill you guys want to die on that's fine by me but be prepared to have the whole investigation thrown out, because there is massive amounts of the appearances of impropriety from those that started the investigation and those currently under mueller. If Whitaker is incapable of being neutral than you have to conclude the same about all of them.Whitaker has said he would decrease Mueller's budget if he were AG, in order to "grind Mueller's investigation to a halt".
He also said, that Sessions recused, not because he had anything to "hide" but, Sessions recused because of an "appearance of Impropriety".
Which apparently is part of the legal lexicon, for when a judge should recuse himself.
So, Whitaker certainly has an appearance of impropriety concerning the Mueller investigation. Should he recuse?
In the sane and rational universe, Whitaker should recuse. How can Whitaker oversee an investigation impartially, when we have video evidence of him admitting his preconceived notions that he holds.
Maybe the evidence Mueller has uncovered will turn him, but, my thinking, is that Trump would not of picked anyone not 100% loyal to him rather than the country or, the law.
So, I don't expect Whitaker to recuse himself. Trump fired Sessions because he recused himself. So, Whitaker would have to be a genius level troll in order to make it into that spot, only to recuse himself. It's much more likely that Whitaker is in fact, a total sellout for power and an obsequious lapdog.
Winston is hard left but he is generally fair minded.Hilariously disingenuous from an Obama/Holder/Lynch apologist...
I've said it before and I will say it again. If that's the hill you guys want to die on that's fine by me but be prepared to have the whole investigation thrown out, because there is massive amounts of the appearances of impropriety from those that started the investigation and those currently under mueller. If Whitaker is incapable of being neutral than you have to conclude the same about all of them.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
I'm fine with it as long as that standard is applied equally across the board.Its not a hill anybody has to die on. Whitaker was and is an absurd choice that is becoming more absurd by the minute. This has been a poker game with all the cards face up. Its clear where this is going.
Its not a hill anybody has to die on. Whitaker was and is an absurd choice that is becoming more absurd by the minute. This has been a poker game with all the cards face up. Its clear where this is going.
I'm fine with it as long as that standard is applied equally across the board.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
Better than being a servile Trump slurper every day of the week
Whitaker should resign.....never mind recuse. He is a card carrying joke as are most Trump appointees.
I've said it before and I will say it again. If that's the hill you guys want to die on that's fine by me but be prepared to have the whole investigation thrown out, because there is massive amounts of the appearances of impropriety from those that started the investigation and those currently under mueller. If Whitaker is incapable of being neutral than you have to conclude the same about all of them.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
Yeah, he should resign for not being hostile to the President.
Says the Obama Slurper. Holder COVERED OBAMA'S ASS from Fast n Furious, the IRS targeting, Uranium One...al the way until Lynch took over.
Winston is hard left but he is generally fair minded.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
I know 2 of 3 have been discredited, but this thread isn't even about Obama. He is irrelevant.
Which two pf three have been discredited, and what about them has been "discredited"?
I countered your post with some REALITY and your apparent hypocrisy.
One cannot decry Whitaker's support for the POTUS out of one side of one's mouth, while ignoring the massive CYA terms of Holder/Lynch.
Spoken like a devout partisanThere is no equivalent anywhere in any of the issues surrounding the FBI, Mueller, the Justice Dept generally comparable to the absurdity of Whitaker to its head. So find something the equivalent of Whitaker to the head of Justice and I am with you.
Strozk, page, comey, McCabe, ohr?I haven't seen anything coming from the right that stuck in regards to showing the FBI's political bias against conservatives. Every single "bomb shell" they touted did not land. The IG report, the Nunes memo, etc.
I get it he operates with partisan blinders and I'm sure he would say the same about me. It's a matter of perspective.One cannot decry Whitaker's support for the POTUS out of one side of one's mouth, while ignoring the massive CYA terms of Holder/Lynch.
Whitaker has said he would decrease Mueller's budget if he were AG, in order to "grind Mueller's investigation to a halt".
He also said, that Sessions recused, not because he had anything to "hide" but, Sessions recused because of an "appearance of Impropriety".
Which apparently is part of the legal lexicon, for when a judge should recuse himself.
So, Whitaker certainly has an appearance of impropriety concerning the Mueller investigation. Should he recuse?
In the sane and rational universe, Whitaker should recuse. How can Whitaker oversee an investigation impartially, when we have video evidence of him admitting his preconceived notions that he holds.
Maybe the evidence Mueller has uncovered will turn him, but, my thinking, is that Trump would not of picked anyone not 100% loyal to him rather than the country or, the law.
So, I don't expect Whitaker to recuse himself. Trump fired Sessions because he recused himself. So, Whitaker would have to be a genius level troll in order to make it into that spot, only to recuse himself. It's much more likely that Whitaker is in fact, a total sellout for power and an obsequious lapdog.
Strozk, page, comey, McCabe, ohr?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
No evidence has emerged that Ohr was involved in the initiation of the Russia probe or that Ohr mishandled sensitive information.[6][7] According to a comprehensive review by ABC News, Ohr "had little impact on the FBI’s growing probe into Trump and his associates."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?