- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 134,496
- Reaction score
- 14,621
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I'd be inclined to agree that both as equally misguided.
As for which is worse? :shrug: I suppose it depends on who you favor and how thin your skin.
I suppose the point that you are making is that Obama is about the same as Bush but with the press and the Islamofascists on his side.Americans were fed up with Bush by this time, and he exited the WH with a 22% approval rating!!
:lamo
Of course it doesn't because double standards are you norm
I'd be inclined to agree that both as equally misguided.
As for which is worse? :shrug: I suppose it depends on who you favor and how thin your skin.
No, because they are not the same.
By your standards nothing is the same, you pick and choose what you want to consider the same. Your obvious short term memory does nothing for your credibility.
No, by actual standards.
No, it is because they are different. And one (Obama) is worse and less attached to real events. Obama is often more charged with exaggerated and nonevents and issues.
So you are saying the monkey Bush face is more attached to real events then?
How about the Bush/Hitler?
Or maybe the vampire? Or the devil?
Really! Such rubbish!
How quickly you forget how all the progressives / liberals / Democrats turned on Bush in the most vehement, despicable and crude ways.
Of the criticism that is worth of any real attention, it all came far too late in the case of Obama.
From the time the Biased Lame Stream Media went sweet on Obama to only recently, any legitimate criticism of Obama and his policies was met with cries of 'Racist' and 'Racism'.
If anything, you object to the now lost outright protection, favoritism and nothing but positive reporting the Biased Lame Stream Media condoned on Obama.
Search your feeling and your memories. You know it to be true.
The difference is that while both sides have called for the impeachment of their opposition, on the republican side you have elected representatives who have made the most inane accusations (ex Obama is not an american, he pals around with terrorists, he hates america and americans, he's a kenyan anti-colonialist) while on the left, the people who made inane accusations about bush* were not elected to office.
Is that right? So tell me who wrote up the articles of Impeachment, a non elected official? You people have very selective memories
Don't you read?
My posts clearly states "both sides have called for the impeachment of their opposition"
Fed Report: Most US families can't raise $400 - World Socialist Web SiteA typical American household cannot raise $400 without borrowing money or selling possessions, according to the results of a survey published Friday by the Federal Reserve, the US central bank. The Fed’s Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2013 points to the precarious state of the majority of US households, who risk poverty or bankruptcy in the event of job loss, accident or unforeseen medical expense.
. . . .
The survey helps expose the fictitious character of the economic “recovery,” which has supposedly been going on for five years. Seventy percent of respondents said they were no better off than they were in 2008, during the depth of the worst downturn since the Great Depression. From this the report draws the extraordinarily understated conclusion that the recovery has been “uneven.”
. . . .
The disastrous condition of US households is the result of the deliberate policies of the Obama administration, which has provided the banks and financial corporations with trillions of dollars in free cash, while encouraging companies to slash wages and offering no meaningful assistance to homeowners or student loan borrowers in distress.
Please show me the articles of Impeachment against Obama.
Please show me where I said the repubs have produced articles of impeachment
Unless you have article of Impeachment it is only rhetoric
Back to topic.
Obama's poll numbers are the lowest they've ever been. Even the World Socialists seem to think that it's because of his economic policies.
Fed Report: Most US families can't raise $400 - World Socialist Web Site
Yeah, well, given his 'ahem' work history, it's little surprise that Obama's got no clue about the reality the rest of the country is working under.
That's what we're talking about....rhetoric
That's what we're talking about....rhetoric
we are talking about which is worse, talking about Impeachment or actually drafting the Articles.
That is what you are talking about, we are talking about which is worse, talking about Impeachment or actually drafting the Articles. You have very selective memory as well as a double standard. The hatred for Bush far exceeded anything we have seen against Obama. None of Bush's hatred had anything to do with the economic results but everything to do with the War. Obama's dislike is due to his economic and foreign policy failures and incompetence.
How about telling me exactly what it is about Obama that you like and what has he done to make things better for the country?
Heya Conservative. :2wave: Don't look like much.....huh? Well at least according to everybody but the BO supporters.....even to now include, the Socialists. :lol:
From EB's link.
Of the two-thirds of households who had savings in 2008, a quarter reported using up “some” or “nearly all” of their savings “to pay for bills and expenses.”
The disastrous condition of household finances is an expression of the continued prevalence of mass unemployment and the expansion of low-wage labor. The share of the US population that is employed remains at 59 percent, down from nearly 65 percent at the beginning of 2000.....snip~
Heya Conservative. :2wave: Don't look like much.....huh? Well at least according to everybody but the BO supporters.....even to now include, the Socialists. :lol:
From EB's link.
Of the two-thirds of households who had savings in 2008, a quarter reported using up “some” or “nearly all” of their savings “to pay for bills and expenses.”
The disastrous condition of household finances is an expression of the continued prevalence of mass unemployment and the expansion of low-wage labor. The share of the US population that is employed remains at 59 percent, down from nearly 65 percent at the beginning of 2000.....snip~
Not at all a surprise that in the 2008 recession / depression (depends on who you ask), that nearly all households had to dip into or exhaust their savings to pay the bills. What's more amazing is that during the same time, many households paid down their debts, at least so I'm told.
The study by the World Socialists is telling and worrisome. It petty much confirms that most households are in a precarious financial position, without reserves to handle the unexpected expenses of the curve balls that life typically throws at each of us.
Interesting, to observe, that they trace that right back to Obama's failed economic and stimulus policies, rather than what one would expect from socialists, which is the evils and unfairness of the capitalistic economic system itself, as well as the 1%ers, and businesses exploiting the bourgeois. Almost out of character, one could imagine.
Guess Obama must really have screwed the pooch with his economic and stimulus policies to have garnered the wrath of the Socialists like this.
Makes you wonder why so many still support Obama. Guess it has something to do with the supporters being the ones who need the Federal Govt. to take care of them. Most have no idea where the money comes from that Obama spends
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?