• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

America doesn’t need more God. It needs more atheists.

What do you mean?

He is objectivly choosing to live an adulterous lifestyle, living in sin with Melania according to the Biblical definition of sin.

I don't really care who he sleeps with myself, but he unrepentantly lives every day in open defiance of Jesus' teachings.

So it is bizarre that he gets so much support from supposed Christians.
EVERYBODY lives in sin, Christians just know how to find forgiveness, so don't think God is on your side.
 
EVERYBODY lives in sin, Christians just know how to find forgiveness, so don't think God is on your side.
Sin is just a silly religious concept designed to control behavior through fear and/or reward.
 
Ok. Definition changes won't make themselves. Off with the memo!
You go ahead. I'm fine with the definitions as they are.
 
EVERYBODY lives in sin, Christians just know how to find forgiveness, so don't think God is on your side.

Seems pretty silly that all those churches wouldn't support their gay members or allow them in the priesthood, or even in the congregation at all in many cases, doesn't it? Everyone is just as guilty of living a sinful lifestyle as any homosexual, so picking on gay folk, in particular, seems bizarre.

I actually think it is very open-minded of you to support a president who openly and unrepentantly defies Jesus.
 
Last edited:
You go ahead. I'm fine with the definitions as they are.
That's very zen of you; if you're content with contradictions then who am I to get in your way
 
What contradictions? The definitions are clear.
Someone who is a-theistic is not an atheist? Ummm ...ok.
I disagree though, regarding its assumed clarity.
 
Sin is just a silly religious concept designed to control behavior through fear and/or reward.
Then why do you bitch aɓout Trump living in it?
 
Someone who is a-theistic is not an atheist? Ummm ...ok.
I disagree though, regarding its assumed clarity.
If you believe in a god you are not an atheist. If you do not follow or adhere to a religion, you are areligious. So by definition, you are an areligious theist. Hope that clears things up for you.
 
No, I speak in a voice I hope you'll understand. Sadly, no luck.
Wait. This is Satan speak? I am not fluent in that. Could you just speak in regular old American English for me?
 
Wait. This is Satan speak? I am not fluent in that. Could you just speak in regular old American English for me?
I thought for sure you'd understand Satan speak. But no, that's not what this is. Now go away and stop bothering me.
 
If you believe in a god you are not an atheist. If you do not follow or adhere to a religion, you are areligious. So by definition, you are an areligious theist. Hope that clears things up for you.
Are you not a-religious as well?
 
Then your distinction is for naught.
Not at all. I do not believe in any god/s nor do I follow/practice any religion. Two different things. Although, they are often put together as one in casual conversation.
 
No. Would you mind presenting some of the definitions from your Satan dictionary?

I don't think people should go to a debate forum and fear debate.

Seems odd.
This isn't a "debate forum", it's a food fight.
 
Back
Top Bottom