You mean the whole War on Terror and the boondoggles it has created was "turning the other cheek?"
Yep.
But you know what the real reason we haven't won yet... Apparently.
We just haven't killed enough people... Apparently.
I mean if we just "Wipe Them Out" then it'll be done... Apparently.
It's really that simple.
Apparently.
Al Qaeda has a magazine?
Yep.
But you know what the real reason we haven't won yet... Apparently.
We just haven't killed enough people... Apparently.
I mean if we just "Wipe Them Out" then it'll be done... Apparently.
It's really that simple.
Apparently.
Al Qaeda has a magazine?
Na, they'll just blow up a dirty bomb in Manhattan and Trump will just get richer, and we'll send Obama over to the caliphate as a diplomat.
Al Qaeda has a magazine?
Al Qaeda has a magazine?
Yep.
But you know what the real reason we haven't won yet... Apparently.
We just haven't killed enough people... Apparently.
I mean if we just "Wipe Them Out" then it'll be done... Apparently.
It's really that simple.
Apparently.
It's not that we haven't killed enough people. The problem is that we haven't killed the right people yet.
If the USA had killed Hitler and the Emperor of Japan right after it entered WWII we would have saved a lot of people's life's and money.
Think about that a little bit.
Al Qaeda has a magazine?
Who are the "right" people in an organization in which everyone is expendable?
Then let that organization and its expendable members be expended, so that they can't threaten the world anymore.
Who are the "right" people in an organization in which everyone is expendable?
Those who are telling others what to do and when and where to do it.
Pretty frickin' simple.
:lol:
Not really. There's always someone else willing to step in and replace them. Defeating Nazi Germany and ending their surviving leadership via Nuremberg didn't eradicate The Nazi movement. It's still around today andParticularly when targeting a movement in which the participants embrace imminent death as a desirable outcome.it is neither efficient or effective to spend millions of dollars to kill someone today who will be replaced tomorrow.
In today's world millions of dollars is a small sum. If it just costs a few millions to kill the leader of a group which is causing problems you just keep killing every one that pops up like playing whack-a-mole.
:lol:
No thanks.That doesn't get anyone anywhere.
AlQaeda's magazine has called for American business leaders to be targeted:
Al Qaeda magazine calls for targeting American business leaders | Fox News
This is why these scumbags need to be wiped out sooner rather than later. Turning the other cheek just won't work, because then we're all going to run out of cheeks.
Al Qaeda has a magazine?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?