• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Allen denies using racial slur in school

Stinger said:
Oh, do we want to talk about your little thread concerning Carl Rove and what you showed there as far as credibility?

Stick to issues not personal attacks.

The issue was whether you have any credibility. I say no. That's not a personal attack. That is my assessment of you, Stinger. I don't mind your thinking I don't have any credibility. That's your prerogative.
 
aps said:
The issue was whether you have any credibility.

No the issue is Allen and you have mistaken me for somewho who could give a ____ about what you think about MY credibility vis-a-vis your post concerning Rove.

It does show how lacking of substance your actual post are and I would think the moderators would be issuing you warnings about such post. They belong in the Basement.
 
:alert

aps said:
Stinger had NO credibility whatsoever. NONE. ZILCHO.

aps said:
The issue was whether you have any credibility. I say no. That's not a personal attack. That is my assessment of you, Stinger. I don't mind your thinking I don't have any credibility. That's your prerogative.


Moderator's Warning:
Simply stating that an insult is nothing more than a personal "assessment" doesn't cut it. Shall I call someone a perfect dick-tard with a heightened sense of nincompoopery and expect to get away with it by stating that it is merely a personal "assessment?"

Non-civility (basement fodder) will always lead to rule infractions and thusly Moderator action.
 
Last edited:
GySgt said:
:alert






Moderator's Warning:
Simply stating that an insult is nothing more than a personal "assessment" doesn't cut it. Shall I call someone a perfect dick-tard with a heightened sense of nincompoopery and expect to get away with it by stating that it is merely a personal "assessment?"

Non-civility (basement fodder) will always lead to rule infractions and thusly Moderator action.

Okay. Stinger, I apologize for what I said. You have some credibility. ;) Seriously, I am sorry.
 
aps said:
Okay. Stinger, I apologize for what I said. You have some credibility. ;) Seriously, I am sorry.

Appology accepted

:kissy:
 
aps said:
Okay. Stinger, I apologize for what I said. You have some credibility. ;) Seriously, I am sorry.

You are too nice. You must be a democrat. :mrgreen:
 
Stinger said:
Appology accepted

:kissy:

Stinger, you're the best! Really. People who accept apologies graciously are people of true class. So this is for you:

:2bow:
 
lol. im glad that at the end of the day, even if we have differing opinions, we can mostly still be civil
 
" All you need is love" - the Beatles
 
Back
Top Bottom