I didn't 'deal' with him at AJ. I commissioned him to make programmes for me when I was running a BBC documentary channel. He later went to AJ. He's no longer there, he's back at the BBC. His name is Paul Gibbs. Google him.
so you lied... got it...
I said I had dealings with AJ, and he was the HofDocs at the time. I was dealing with the features department, not his department. He and I had worked together previously. Sorry I didn't make that clear.When I had dealings with AJ, about 8 or so years ago, their Head of Documentaries was Jewish, recruited from Discovery Channel iirc.
in afghanistan we had both al jazeera english and arabic,and both were the most unbiased,truthful i had ever seen in mainstreammedia.
ithink aj is under attack because they tend to filter nothing,from beheadings,to govt corruption,to internation conflicts no other msm will cover but insteadshow a story about a mass shooting ora pregnant women goingmissing or other forms of sensationalism over journalism.
to topit off,al jazeera in arabic with subtitles covered more european news and american news than european and american msm.most stories of importance willnever see msm.
Really, i always thought AJ arabic was under the same management.
Same owner, not management. There are some crossovers with some journalists. And in fact many of the journalists on Al Jazeera in Arabic come from liberal Arab countries.. Egypt, Lebanon and even Syria. They are not brain dead radical muslims from Iranian's and Saudi's .. which is what most American's think.
I never claimed to have dealth with him at AJ. I said:
I said I had dealings with AJ, and he was the HofDocs at the time. I was dealing with the features department, not his department. He and I had worked together previously. Sorry I didn't make that clear.
No, Al J is under attack because of Bush and Rumsfeldt. They could not control the station during the Iraq occupation and in Afghanistan (like the rest of the worlds media). Al Jazeera stood for quite a few embarrassing stories for the US military occupation forces and in return Rumsfeldt started targeting the station with verbal, legal and military attacks. It thankfully did not shut them up one bit and they continue to expose the parts of the US military occupation forces that were corrupt and did bad things. They also had the nerve to give a voice to the insurgence forces (mostly non Al Q) which pissed off the US even more.
Before Iraq, Al Jazeera was actually a favorite of the US administration and was openly backed as a force of change in the middle east. That of course changed when the US starting invading and Al Jazeera started asking the hard questions.
:lol: Al Gore taking oil money isn't even the best part. :mrgreen:
Oh, what is the best part?
They rushed the deal so that it wouldn't get hit with higher tax rates. :lamo
:mrgreen:
Vile disgusting white washing of a vile disgusting propoganda arm of the jihad against the west...period..
your post is BS..
And you are brainwashed it seems.
My post is very factual. Maybe you dont remember the famous Rumsfeldt attacks on Al Jazeera for showing civilian deaths by US troops during the Iraq invasion and occupation? Oh wait.. that might not have been shown on your favorite propaganda channel.. Fox News.
You lied.. read your BS again.. you fumbled your credibilty.. you got called out on your blatent bs..
now just for fun ... show me where Paul Gibbs as you claim is Jewish...who now never worked FOR AJ...
My God, you're not only trolling, but you can't read either.
nice spin... you lied...period..
calling out your Bs is not trolling.. but go ahead a whine..
PS....Is is joy day yet.. is Hugo Chavez dead yet?...
Maybe you dont remember the famous Rumsfeldt attacks on Al Jazeera for showing civilian deaths by US troops during the Iraq invasion and occupation? Oh wait.. that might not have been shown on your favorite propaganda channel.. Fox News.
No, but it's Friday. Fish-frying day. Go sizzle!
whatever... lets hope Chavez dies soon...
Disagree with someone politically = hope they die soon.
Nice ethics there.
This would be a channel for the low information types.
Disagree with someone politically = hope they die soon.
Nice ethics there.
Disagree with someone politically = hope they die soon.
Nice ethics there.
How did Fox do at reporting accurately this last election? :lol:
When people with such a notion get power, watch out.
Travis struggles with words of more than 4 letters. Don't hate on him for not understanding that 6-letter word.
I'm not a Chavez fan. And I'm not a Burlesconi fan either. I don't want them "die soon" however.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?