• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AIDE DETAILS TRUMP’S RAGE ON JAN. 6He Knew Crowd Was Armed, but Tried to Loosen Security, Testimony Recounts

What are you talking about. You want justices killed then?

I never said that. I know what you ate referring to with the justice stuff (even if it is hyperbolic bullshit) but I have no idea what you are referring to with the pregnancy centers.
 
Best I can tell, Trump is the only conservative president we’ve had since Calvin Coolidge and Richard Nixon. George W seem to be a lot more concerned with committing war crimes in Iraq then ending Roe versus Wade. Oh and also cutting social services while giving giant tax breaks to one percent donors. Not very conservative to me. Robert Taft would be turning in his grave.

I only see evidence that elements of the GOP professional class who never liked him in the first place are saying things like this. The base still overwhelmingly loves Trump. Also, Hutchinson did not have any appreciable access to Trump that I can see. And the people who had direct access to him to know about what she claims to be talking about, or already saying that it’s bullshit.

I‘m quite sure that you cheered loudly for George Bush’s war in Iraq, and noisily atttacked anyone who dared criticize the Bush administration

The same people who were doing that then, became tea partiers and trumpsters.

Being on the wrong side of history seems to be a thing with the talk radio/ right wing social media sewer types.

As for giving tax breaks to wealthy donors. That has been the hallmark of EVERY GOP administration since Ronald Reagan. Your fuhrer included.
 
For all we know, they didn't even know Engel was in that car at all, although that seems unlikely - maybe he just told them he drove the president back to the WH and never mentioned the anger or attempted control wresting.

You're kidding, right?
A minute-by-minute accounting of the President's movements has been a central focus of the House select committee investigating January 6, and sources tell CNN that several members of the Secret Service have testified.

The head of Trump's protective detail, Robert Engel, Vice President Mike Pence's detail, Tim Giebels, and a deputy chief of staff for Trump, Tony Ornato, all spoke to the committee, a source told CNN. The source added conversations have occurred regularly including as recently as this week.


In his testimony, Engel reportedly recalled his discussion with Trump about the then-President’s desire to go to the Capitol, according to Politico. Engel testified that he and the President were at odds on the matter. Engel opposed Trump’s request, and testified that they returned to the White House. Trump ultimately did not make an appearance on Capitol Hill.

Engel told Jan. 6 select committee investigators that the two men discussed Trump’s desire to go to the Capitol and took different views on the topic. Engel noted that they went back to the White House instead of heading to Capitol Hill. The contents of Engel’s testimony have not been previously reported. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi declined to comment.


Any number of possible reasons they would not know, but it's all guesswork until I see some recorded or live testimony from Engel and/or Ornato.

I'll repeat my bet - 1,000 doughnuts that Lizzy and the committee never release any testimony from Engel or Ornato.
 
This, again, is straight up confirmation of the double standard you have when it comes to anything Trump.

The chick gave third hand information and you lapped it up like a cat laps milk. The media reports contradictory information, ostensibly coming from the same sources Hutchinson cited, and you treat those reports as being unreliable.
The Left will lionize Satan if he testified against Trump.
 
You're kidding, right?










I'll repeat my bet - 1,000 doughnuts that Lizzy and the committee never release any testimony from Engel or Ornato.
1001 donuts if Cheney calls Engel or Ornato, who have said they are awaiting the invite.
 
You're kidding, right?










I'll repeat my bet - 1,000 doughnuts that Lizzy and the committee never release any testimony from Engel or Ornato.

If you bothered to read the links you cited, you would see that it is readily apparant that an argument did take place. Whether it involved trump trying to grab the steering wheel isn’t actually important.

But since it’s the only straw trump losers have, they’re totally obsessed with it. It presents a handy excuse for ignoring all the other facts and testimony involving trump’s insurrection scheme and the cabal that was involved in it.
 
I did. 1,000 times.

You have blessed day, OK
YOU made this statement " the Secret Service contacted the Committee to dispute this woman's testimony. "
and in this post from CNN the ONLY one I have found it doesn't say the SS went to the Comm. right after and told them anything
SO again if you can't post something to back up what you are saying I have to presume it is just another right wing LIE
and AGAIN here is the search I did and it all says they are going to in the FUTURE and have NOT yet.
Have a nice day
 
This isn't a jury. It's not a trial. Do you even know what is going on?
Yeah! It's a propaganda show promoting the Democrat agenda for the midterms and, perhaps, even 2024. Since Democrats have absolutely nothing else to run on they are going with the "We hate Trump" platform that earned them 15.4 million votes more than Hillary got. With that kind of success why not go with the full blown "Execute the Romanovs" plan. It worked for Lenin so why would it not work for Cheney and Kinzinger?
 
Yeah! It's a propaganda show promoting the Democrat agenda for the midterms and, perhaps, even 2024. Since Democrats have absolutely nothing else to run on they are going with the "We hate Trump" platform that earned them 15.4 million votes more than Hillary got. With that kind of success why not go with the full blown "Execute the Romanovs" plan. It worked for Lenin so why would it not work for Cheney and Kinzinger?

Is that what Benghazi was? A propaganda show? I don't ever remember you saying that about all of those hearings right before the 2016 election.

This is not a jury. This is not a trial. It's a hearing. You do know they happen all the time on the Hill, yes? I mean, when they are not hosting keggers.
 
Absolutely.

They all know. But only the 26-year-old staffer testified about it under oath.

Cassidy Hutchinson did so at risk to her safety. Her social circle. Her career.

Contrast her to the Trumpers, hiding behind the Fifth Amendment.
What a risk she took! She got national notoriety and will certainly be rewarded. Give it a month or two, she'll be on CNN or MSNBC.
 
What a risk she took! She got national notoriety and will certainly be rewarded. Give it a month or two, she'll be on CNN or MSNBC.
That is, if her story isn't prove false and she's then arrested for perjury.
 
Is that what Benghazi was? A propaganda show? I don't ever remember you saying that about all of those hearings right before the 2016 election.

This is not a jury. This is not a trial. It's a hearing. You do know they happen all the time on the Hill, yes? I mean, when they are not hosting keggers.
It's not a "hearing". It's Stalinist propaganda. A hearing would include committee members with conflicting political interests and this committee expressly prohibited that function.
 
It's not a "hearing". It's Stalinist propaganda. A hearing would include committee members with conflicting political interests and this committee expressly prohibited that function.

Yes, because we all should ignore Liz Cheney voting 93% of the time with the Republicans. It's a smoke screen! And Kinzinger voting with the GOP over 90% of the time. It isn't real!

McCarthy pulled back his 5 other people when Pelosi rejected Jordan. Do you have any clue what is going on, ever?
 
YOU made this statement " the Secret Service contacted the Committee to dispute this woman's testimony. "
and in this post from CNN the ONLY one I have found it doesn't say the SS went to the Comm. right after and told them anything
SO again if you can't post something to back up what you are saying I have to presume it is just another right wing LIE
and AGAIN here is the search I did and it all says they are going to in the FUTURE and have NOT yet.
Have a nice day

Perhaps if you burned that right wing lie filter of yours, the truth might get through.

The Secret Service, through the Department of Homeland Security Office of Legislative Affairs, notified the committee Tuesday afternoon that it will make the agents involved available to testify under oath, the official said. The agents are also prepared to say under oath that the incident itself did not occur.


 
That is, if her story isn't prove false and she's then arrested for perjury.
LOL You think Garland, Biden's lapdog, is going to arrest anyone, ever, for saying bad things about Trump? Be serious.
 

Odd, your link takes us to a story in the very trashy Murdoch tabloid, the New York Post. it’s a story about the Stanley Cup.

And it is the New York Post after all. Their record of passing off stupendous lies is right up there.
 
You're kidding, right?










I'll repeat my bet - 1,000 doughnuts that Lizzy and the committee never release any testimony from Engel or Ornato.
None of that indicates it didn't happen, if I put a few quotation marks in the second article's description you'll see what I mean:

Engel told Jan. 6 select committee investigators that the two men "discussed Trump’s desire to go to the Capitol" and "took different views on the topic." Engel noted that they went back to the White House instead of heading to Capitol Hill. The contents of Engel’s testimony have not been previously reported. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi declined to comment.

Now, that's not the same thing as saying it DID happen, but certainly it makes me wonder what Engle would testify to if directly asked about the story Hutchinson described Ornato telling about his experience that day.
 
Back
Top Bottom