I have the fact that the SS already gave testimony and...here it is....they were actually IN THE CAR. So, why does the Jan. 6 committee need the testimony about what went on in that car, from someone who was NOT in the car?I have a high level trump official under oath. What do you got?
His arm certainly would.The window between the passenger copmpartment and the driving compartment doesn't open that wide. Look at that picture WOuld Trump fit through that window?
So? Call them back?I have the fact that the SS already gave testimony and...here it is....they were actually IN THE CAR. So, why does the Jan. 6 committee need the testimony about what went on in that car, from someone who was NOT in the car?
I mean, you do know that the committee got testimony from Engel and others over a year ago, right?
An anonymous source gives them heresay so that they can say a woman under oath, who admitted it was hearsay, was lying about what someone else told her and should they get their way and it not be true, then they don't go after the source that told her that, they pretend she her self lied and therefore all of her testimony is false.
Notice how they aren't talking about ANYTHING else in the testimony? None of it. That's because they didn't watch any of it and they are watching their instructors to tell them what to attack.
With his tiny little baby girl hands....How would trump fit through that window?
Link to their testimony.I have the fact that the SS already gave testimony and...here it is....they were actually IN THE CAR. So, why does the Jan. 6 committee need the testimony about what went on in that car, from someone who was NOT in the car?
I mean, you do know that the committee got testimony from Engel and others over a year ago, right?
The anecdote isn't that he crawled into the driver's seat. The anecdote is that he reached into the driver's compartment and attempted to grab the steering wheel. Are you capable of grabbing the steering wheel from the rear seat of your car?How would trump fit through that window?
His arm certainly would.
I think a man with no impulse control and infantile executive function would act exactly as described.So you think the president tried to commandeer the Presidential Limmo and drive it to the Capitol with one arm?
IF this happened and the SS gave testimony under oath, when then it follows that the Jan. 6 committee has known about his "bombshell" for over a year. I'm trying to imagine why they would have a low-level aide testify to this hearsay rather than say, bring the SS agents actually in the car that day, to give first-hand testimony as to the allegation.Link to their testimony.
No. But wouldn't you agree that the story that he angrily reached into the drivers compartment and tried to grab the steering wheel and then lunged at his protective detail is certainly plausible given what we know about the interior of the vehicle?So you think the president tried to commandeer the Presidential Limmo and drive it to the Capitol with one arm?
Yeah, the guy they say can't even walk down a ramp could suddenly HURL his corpulent, 70+ year old body from the back seat. Laughable.So you think the president tried to commandeer the Presidential Limmo and drive it to the Capitol with one arm?
I think a man with no impulse control and infantile executive function would act exactly as described.
Watching you make shit up on the fly is funny.The window between the passenger copmpartment and the driving compartment doesn't open that wide. Look at that picture WOuld Trump fit through that window?
It’s not a court of law. It’s a politically charged partisan committee. If this were a legal proceeding they would want the agent driving to testify to this.Exactly, they would never have had that testimony today if they didn't already have it from someone else.
And the Jan. 6 committee already has their testimony.Except the two actual agents who would be witnesses are reported to refute the second hand testimony.
No. But wouldn't you agree that the story that he angrily reached into the drivers compartment and tried to grab the steering wheel and then lunged at his protective detail is certainly plausible given what we know about the interior of the vehicle?
When did they deny it? Were those men asked about it? What did they say? And do you have a link?Why didnt the securty detail mention any of this when they testified? Why is it being reported now that they deny any of it actually happened?
Bullshit.. they started using a modified Chevy suburban in late 2020.. it’s called the presidential SUV
And the Jan. 6 committee already has their testimony.
'...are reported...' suggests you have a primary source.Except the two actual agents who would be witnesses are reported to refute the second hand testimony.
So your proof of any damn thing you said is that you couldn't "imagine" it any other way than what you want to believe. That some solid sourcing pal. I got a HIGH level aide testifying under oath. You got nothing but your admitted imagination.IF this happened and the SS gave testimony under oath, when then it follows that the Jan. 6 committee has known about his "bombshell" for over a year. I'm trying to imagine why they would have a low-level aide testify to this hearsay rather than say, bring the SS agents actually in the car that day, to give first-hand testimony as to the allegation.
Why would they have a low-level aide testify to hearsay? Because the ignorant, TDS rageaholics wouldn't even stop to question it.
One possibility, but the man puts ketchup on well done steak. And fries. It IS a vegetable, after all.Well there was ketchup, so probably cheese burgers.
They are under oath.It’s not a court of law. It’s a politically charged partisan committee. If this were a legal proceeding they would want the agent driving to testify to this.
Of course it’s not, and everyone knows this
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?