• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

After Trump pledge, top White House official says China auto tariffs 'must be reduced'

MTAtech

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
26,324
Reaction score
19,766
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
[h=1]The Hill: After Trump pledge, top White House official says China auto tariffs 'must be reduced'[/h]
White House trade adviser Peter Navarro on Monday did not confirm whether China agreed to reduce tariffs on imported automobiles, which President Trump cited as a key concession made by Beijing in a trade ceasefire.
"That certainly came up as well in discussions," Navarro said on NPR when asked about Trump's claim. "So, that's just one of the many tariffs that have to be reduced."

Trump tweeted Sunday night following his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping that "China has agreed to reduce and remove tariffs on cars coming into China from the U.S. Currently the tariff is 40%."
...
But Chinese officials did not mention auto tariffs as a component of the truce the two leaders agreed to at the Group of 20 summit over the weekend, fueling confusion about what exactly they agreed to during the talks.
So, Trump claims to have struck a big deal with China; but his own trade advisors don't seem to know anything about it. The best guess is that Trump heard what he wanted to hear, that there never was a deal. This is troubling; trade is one thing but think of how troubling this would be for, let's say, nuclear agreements?
 

Mr Person

A Little Bitter
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
49,706
Reaction score
33,685
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
He creates a problem, then claims it as a victory when he only slightly 'solves' the problem (usually by offering concessions to the entity he pissed off while creating the problem). If this weren't Opposite World, this hilariously idiotic tactic wouldn't work. But it is, so his supporters cheer him on and claim him as the best president ever.
 

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
37,820
Reaction score
24,269
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Isn’t it worrisome to start a fight and then call “uncle” first!
 

MTAtech

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
26,324
Reaction score
19,766
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
He creates a problem, then claims it as a victory when he only slightly 'solves' the problem (usually by offering concessions to the entity he pissed off while creating the problem). If this weren't Opposite World, this hilariously idiotic tactic wouldn't work. But it is, so his supporters cheer him on and claim him as the best president ever.

Agreed.

On the thought that Trump actually got a trade agreement, stock markets rallied yesterday. Today, they're down over 2% when it was realized that the agreement was fantasy.
 

tres borrachos

HoHoHo
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 20, 2012
Messages
83,047
Reaction score
57,686
Location
Biden's 'Murica
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Moderate
So, Trump claims to have struck a big deal with China; but his own trade advisors don't seem to know anything about it. The best guess is that Trump heard what he wanted to hear, that there never was a deal. This is troubling; trade is one thing but think of how troubling this would be for, let's say, nuclear agreements?

Tariff Man said what?
 
Top Bottom