Re: The Visa Lottery Program - Post Latest NYC Terrorist Attack
No. You're assuming now. Try to wait for the law to find out the facts...
Oh, of course I'm assuming. But we can see the obvious even without years of research and study.
- Him being an IS plant for seven years so he can run some people over is nonsensical. I mean, make a bomb or find a gun.
- Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and IS all have a strong history of claiming anything and everything that happens inside and outside their region (even as another claims it). This guy admitted already that he got his inspiration from the IS website. IS turns around and claims the attack. Were this something that was seven years in the making, IS would announce that with pride because it goes to legitimacy and relevancy.
My assumption isn't based on nothing.
OK then...let's play "assumptions".
Let's "assume" this devout Uzbeky Muslim wins this lottery and comes to America with his family.
That after a few years, is so disgusted with American society, that he rams a truck down a bike path in NYC to kill Americans.
I think its safe to "assume" that:
A. This lottery was a bad idea
B. Devout Uzbeky Muslims are not compatible with American society and should no longer be admitted...under any circumstances.
Well, first your assumption agrees that he did not come to the U.S. as an IS disciple, thus there was nothing that vetting could catch. Second, the lottery being a bad idea is after the fact and it would have only been a bad idea for this individual, who passed the vetting process. So let's just block Uzbekistan.
France is full of devout Muslims and their ghettos are great recruitment locales for Islamist extremists. It's only a matter of time before one flies on into the U.S. to do his thing. It would be very difficult to discern, even with vetting, the more devout from the less devout; and even then, you would have to discern the difference between the more devout from the actual Islamists; and then you would have to discern the difference between an Islamist and an extremist (terrorist to be). So let's just block France. And so on.
The only practical way to give Americans their false sense of security is to block any and all Muslims everywhere. Even making air travel an absolute pain in the butt after 9/11 did little...
According to the
United States Government Accountability Office report to congressional requesters in April 2017...
While the September 11, 2001, attacks were perpetrated by foreign violent extremists, from September 12, 2001 through December 31, 2016, attacks by domestic or “homegrown” violent extremists in the United States resulted in 225 fatalities, according to the ECDB. Of these,
- 106 were killed by far right violent extremists in 62 separate incidents
- 119 were victims of radical Islamist violent extremists in 23 separate incidents.
So now, we would have to kick them all out too. But if even Trump wouldn't do that, we are stuck playing these games of security that really do little to stop the problem. This program is a distraction and merely more of the same political exploitation we have seen time and again this year.