• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

After Data Is Posted On Conspiracy Site, Colorado County's Voting Machines Are Banned

yeah, there was...did you not bother to click on that link.

No there wasn't. I did click on the link. Nothing about gerrymandering.

North Carolina publicly stated in court that the reason they stopped Sunday voting was that counties with Sunday voting were disproportionately black, and blacks disproportionately vote Democrat.

No it didn't. Don't trust partisans posting on Twitter.

Here's the opinion they deceptively cut and paste from. No such admission. The twitterati lied to you.

 
I'm glad they're taking the precaution to ensure a fair vote. We're doing the same by requiring absentee drop boxes be placed in secure, monitored locations - much to the chagrin of Democrats.
 
Colorado already has all the precautions to ensure a fair vote, including numerous secure drop boxes. But Big Lie Nutter Assholes, like Peters here are trying to undermine that.
 



So while this didn't compromise the vote from 2020, it does mean that Mesa County cannot use the voting machines moving forward. So for the next election they either have to replace the machines or they're counting by hand.

Look at this dumbass Big Lie assholes, the only thing they can do is **** shit up. Now Mesa will have to spend more money, either on new machines or the people necessary to do a hand count. Why? Because some ****ing nutter asshole purposefully allowed unauthorized access to the voting machines, and said individual then released the passwords online.

Why is it that when it comes to voter fraud, the one's doing to most for it are the alt-right Cultist, Big Lie nutter assholes? And when can we stop being terrorized by their stupidity?
I thought Dominion,'s machines were incredibly secure and impossible to compromise. Yet one unauthorized person is in the building and they have to throw out the everything? They can't check for tampering, or re-image the machines? That makes no sense.

This event aside, how can voting officials ensure that someone who did have authorized access didn't tamper with them?
 
Good for you. Cut and paste the admission you claim. And take a look for gerrymandering while you are at it. (Hint: neither are there. The partisan loons lied to you, surprise, surprise).
you realize that stopping Sunday voting so blacks cannot vote, because they are black is gerrymandering right? Its also not the first time they have tried these tricks

 
I thought Dominion,'s machines were incredibly secure and impossible to compromise. Yet one unauthorized person is in the building and they have to throw out the everything? They can't check for tampering, or re-image the machines? That makes no sense.

This event aside, how can voting officials ensure that someone who did have authorized access didn't tamper with them?
that person posted those passwords on the internet...and they were provided to the unauthorized person by someone who held the keys....someone who had nefarious motive...
 
I thought Dominion,'s machines were incredibly secure and impossible to compromise. Yet one unauthorized person is in the building and they have to throw out the everything? They can't check for tampering, or re-image the machines? That makes no sense.

This event aside, how can voting officials ensure that someone who did have authorized access didn't tamper with them?
1. No machine cannot be compromised by someone physically tampering with them.

2. The same way evidence is handled in the locker: there are always two people involved.
 
you realize that stopping Sunday voting so blacks cannot vote, because they are black is gerrymandering right?
No it's not. Not even close.

Second and last time - Cut and paste the admission you claim is in the opinion.
 
that person posted those passwords on the internet...and they were provided to the unauthorized person by someone who held the keys....someone who had nefarious motive...
A password issue can normally be resolved. Change the password. But this points to the fact the passwords can easily be compromised.
 
1. No machine cannot be compromised by someone physically tampering with them.

2. The same way evidence is handled in the locker: there are always two people involved.
From this, it didn't sound like the concern was physical tampering. This would also normally be easier to detect.

Two people can be compromised. This is very different than evidence in a police investigation.

Point being, again, these devices appear to be much less tamper resistant than people were insisting in November.
 
From this, it didn't sound like the concern was physical tampering. This would also normally be easier to detect.

Two people can be compromised. This is very different than evidence in a police investigation.

Point being, again, these devices appear to be much less tamper resistant than people were insisting in November.

What it sounds like is that you don't trust our republic at all, to any extent.
 
I'm glad they're taking the precaution to ensure a fair vote. We're doing the same by requiring absentee drop boxes be placed in secure, monitored locations - much to the chagrin of Democrats.
Interesting stance given that you all were against the whole drop box concept to begin with….
 
The "Big Lie" the the one democrats are spreading that Systemic Racism exists in America. It's total BS and nothing more than the marxist/socialist strategy to continue to divide and destroy America.
Not much of systemic racism around any
more, but we are still feeling the effects of it, e.g., the discriminatory application of the GI Bill. What we *do* have are “southern strategy”-like appeals to bigotry that Trump specialized in, and redistricting and voter laws that have discriminatory intent or effect.

And really, “Marxist/socialist strategy?” Why is red-baiting the fall back position of some on the right when they don’t want to argue issues?: “Obama care isn’t wrong because it’s impractical or unaffordable. It’s wrong because of death panels or because it’s another brick in the commie prison that the left is designing for America.” But when Trump said he would replace it with something better, not a peep about creeping socialism from the right.
 
What it sounds like is that you don't trust our republic at all, to any extent.
It sounds like you are trying to deflect from the issue, and can't defend it at all, to any extent.

Again, are Dominion's machines secure and tamper resistant, or does a set of compromised passwords mean that the entire batch has to be thrown out?
 
No it's not. Not even close.

Second and last time - Cut and paste the admission you claim is in the opinion.
The sad thing is that your aren’t arguing if something was Dacian or not, it you are quibbling over using the right terminology of the thing that was racist (in this instance of the article it is both actual gerrymandering and the act of preventing voting on Sunday to prevent African Americans to vote).

As to asking for a quote from the article to show that the gerrymandering in question was based on race…the whole point of the SC decision as described in the article says that’s exactly what it was. The quote is the entire article, basically.

But you are playing lawyer and quibbling over semantics, thinking how clever you are. But, as the old adage goes…the problem with clever people often outsmart themselves into being wrong.
 
It sounds like you are trying to deflect from the issue, and can't defend it at all, to any extent.

Again, are Dominion's machines secure and tamper resistant, or does a set of compromised passwords mean that the entire batch has to be thrown out?

So the impression I get here is that you will not trust any election going forward unless your side wins.
 
Speaking of ”Big Lies”……

Ms Peters is attending a conspiracy theory conference fronted by Lindell, the pillow guy.

Odd……

Isn’t this supposed to be the day that the Glorious Restoration of donald trump was supposed to be happening according to Mr Lindell????

I wonder if anyone is going to ask him about that?

BTW, when I drove past the west side of the Capitol this morning, nothing was going on. No trump mob, no signs, no gallows, no protests,…….

Just about a dozen tourists and a guy cutting the grass.

Admittedly it is blazing hot in DC today. Perhaps the revolution has been postponed.
 
So the impression I get here is that you will not trust any election going forward unless your side wins.
That 'impression' is one of you trying very hard to deflect here.
 
That 'impression' is one of you trying very hard to deflect here.

More like cutting to the chase. You guys have decided that the only legitimate elections are the ones your side wins.
 
In order to prove election security problems, Republicans decided to create election security problems. Bravo.
 
Back
Top Bottom