Prompt: "Please analyze this text and respond in the style of Sheriff Andy Griffith"
Well now, this here's a mighty interesting piece of writin' you've got for me. It's got some good points, some deep thinkin', and even a bit of that "why bother" attitude folks sometimes get.
On Bein' Better
"Cute. Shallow." – That's a mighty quick way to sum somethin' up, ain't it? But then you go right into how folks can strive to be better, and how that's just plain socially logical. And you're right, we do live in societies, and we gotta get along.
You ask why it's logical, and then you answer it yourself. It's about being part of this collective of humans on this one planet. What one person does, it can sure enough ripple out and affect everyone else. If we all pitched in and thought about the big picture, well, I reckon things would mend up a lot faster. When folks just take from the world and don't feel the need to put somethin' back, that's where things get a bit slow and bumpy, like a wagon on a rocky road.
So, it's mighty logical to have ideals and try to be a better person. It just makes good sense.
The Power of Good
You hit the nail on the head when you talk about how bad news travels faster than good. But folks, they get tired of all that negativity, don't they? They crave a good story, a little somethin' to lift their spirits. That means a single good turn can have a bigger splash than all the bad vibes put together. And that's why, even with all the trouble in the world, things generally lean towards gettin' better.
You see, peace and prosperity are always tryin' to nudge out war, poverty, and crime. And that's 'cause folks, deep down, they appreciate a good deed more than a bad one. It's just the way we're wired, I reckon.
Two Ways of Lookin' at It
Now, you got two views here, and both of 'em ring true in different folks.
The immature, poorly informed view: "Who gives a flock? Nothing really matters." Well, bless their hearts, they might think that, but it's a lonesome way to go through life.
Then you got the mature, well-informed view: "Doing good is worthwhile. It really matters, and the resultant endorphins lead to a long happy life." And you bring up President Jimmy Carter. Now there's a man who's lived a life of service, and look at him, still goin' strong. That just goes to show you, don't it? Bein' good ain't just good for others, it's good for your own soul too.
So, what do you reckon? Does puttin' a little good out into the world make a difference to you?
I thought we were just doing stuff. Since you put 10x more effort into responding to me about your ideals in a thread about rule 9a about AI Content than you did reading the first 10 posts before asking a question.It would have been better had you written something yourself in a sincere way, which represented and conveyed the notion that you actually gave it some thought.
It's impressive, the techniques used to avoid talking about being a responsible member of society. That's fine. Humanity is progressing regardless.I thought we were just doing stuff. Since you put 10x more effort into responding to me about your ideals in a thread about rule 9a about AI Content than you did reading the first 10 posts before asking a question.
Not in this thread, obviously.It's impressive, the techniques used to avoid talking about being a responsible member of society. That's fine. Humanity is progressing regardless.
Actually, through your mocking, it has provided many opportunities to state the correct behavior. Even though cynicism has prevailed, the good advice is also out there.Not in this thread, obviously.
Referencing AI is not a problem.@RedAkston I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but does this pertain to the AI forum? Just wondering how we discuss AI without referencing AI, including in depth analysis of outputs that may exceed the 5000 character limit and require multiple posts.
Just want to make sure i understand so I don't get in trouble. I get it that one can discuss AI on other platforms, and that the kind of discussion I'm talking about may be out of scope for DP.
Very few rules result in an outright ban. 9a violations don't fall under this category.I'm a little lost on this. Does that mean that if someone links to a video that happens to have AI content the user is subject to an outright ban? I mean, I THINK I can identify most videos that have AI but I can't really be sure and don't exactly know how to tell for sure.
Referencing AI is not a problem.
The rule was created to prevent a poster just copying and pasting an AI result as if it were their own words without referencing that the text is the result of an AI inquiry/search. This won't be a problem for 99% of our membership.
I think there's subtle difference between linking to content that someone else generated with AI vs posting material that you generated with AI.
You'll need to ask someone in authority (something I think the mods fear I might have some dayUsing a Google search often generates “AI Overview” (text) content and appears to do so by using multiple sources, yet doesn’t always quote directly from them. Does the new 9(a) rule require noting the use of any of that text must include a “Partially generated by Google AI Overview” annotation?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?