A rational argument for no restrictions on abortion

[soylentgreen]

No, I'm leading you down a path where you admit that everything you've identified as a supposed alternative to the legal system, actually depends on the legal system to have any meaning.

Which is a so what? Even being able to walk down a street depends on having a legal system in place. Being able to own something is dependent upon a legal system. That does not mean that we do not have alternatives to a legal system run by a government. A legal system can also be run by the medical professionals as well.

We are not going down any path because we are still stuck in the place that tells us you are just trying to be vague in your use of the word regulations.

 

[Noodlegawd]

Even being able to walk down a street depends on having a legal system in place.

Are you the same soylentgreen who just whined about "the fallacy of absurdity?"

 

[soylentgreen]

Are you the same soylentgreen who just whined about "the fallacy of absurdity?"

Yes, after all you did use such a fallacy. Where as pointing out in a lawless land your right to walk down a street is not there.

 

[dockside]

Imo, the most rational argument for no restrictions on abortions is that the person carrying the child is able to make the decision based on what the medical and life circumstances are.

Does anyone really believe that if the power dynamics of America were still the same, but biological males were the pregnant ones, that abortions would not be readily available?

As Gloria Steinhem once said, "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament."