- Joined
- Sep 23, 2022
- Messages
- 894
- Reaction score
- 61
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Sure let it reach the age where it can be delivered and put into an incubator! Then sterilize the mother!
Sure let it reach the age where it can be delivered and put into an incubator! Then sterilize the mother!If it is separate then relocate it. Easy peasy, win win, right?
Oh wait
Nevermind the natural miscarriage rateWhere has there ever been a right to fatherhood?
BTW, the woman doesn't have a right to motherhood. The child can be taken away from her under certain circumstances.
Miscarriages are not abortions!Nevermind the natural miscarriage rate
Apparently notBECAUSE IT'S HER ****ING BODY IT'S INSIDE OF AND ATTACHED TO! Capiche?
LOL! It's attached to and inside of a person, that is not "separate".It is a separate human, with separate organs, brain, and being!
By definition, “separate” would not be an accurate description, then. By your own admission and definitionSure let it reach the age where it can be delivered and put into an incubator! Then sterilize the mother!
Customs? If even one child is aborted when the father would like to keep said child, it is wrong !
If she wants to keep the pregnancy and give birth and the society encourages women to do that, the society should pay, and taxpayers should all have to pony up for half of the pre-natal, postnatal for her, and child support. But to prevent the society's pushing her around, the woman can take care of the prenatal/postnatal herself if she can and the society should pay half the child support. Of course, childbirth should be free.
Well that's pretty simple.If a man, and a woman agree to consensual sex, and she gets pregnant, why, when the child is equally the mans, does he not get equal protection under the law, lets keep it scientific shall we, leave your emotion next to the tissues. WHY DOES HE NOT RECEIVE EQUAL RIGHTS
Fair enough, and you’re CanadianI don't want my taxes going to some doofus who has a child she can't afford to raise. I had nothing to do w/ it.
So, 9 per year. How many died from pregnancy/childbirth?Liar
During the period from 1998–2010, of approximately 16.1 million abortion procedures, 108 women died, for a mortality rate of 0.7 deaths per 100,000 procedures overall, 0.4 deaths for non-Hispanic white women, 0.5 deaths for Hispanic women, and 1.1 deaths for black women. The mortality rate increased with gestational age, from 0.3 to 6.7 deaths for procedures performed at 8 weeks or less and at 18 weeks or greater, respectively. A majority of abortion-related deaths at 13 weeks of gestation or less were associated with anesthesia complications and infection, whereas a majority of abortion-related deaths at more than 13 weeks of gestation were associated with infection and hemorrhage. In 20 of the 108 cases, the abortion was performed as a result of a severe medical condition where continuation of the pregnancy threatened the woman’s life.
Abortion-Related Mortality in the United States 1998–2010
To examine characteristics and causes of legal induced abortion–related deaths in the United States between 1998 and 2010.Abortion-related deaths were identified through the national Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System with enhanced case-finding. ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
“…Matt’s “Timely Justice Act” streamlined frivolous death penalty appeals and tripled the rate of executions in the months after its passage…” (snip)There will be no charges. That story about Gaetz I could smell as phony from a mile away. He is gaining traction and he scorns the press and liberals, so they want him removed. It was as implausible as Trump colluding with Russia. A moron could have spotted the lie.
Relevant question. The USA has the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world.So, 9 per year. How many died from pregnancy/childbirth?
nope thats YOUR claim about how YOU feel. actual facts and science were posted like you askedWrong, not one person has posted anything but how they feel
once again NOT the truth just more of your hilarious feelings that nobody honest, the educated objective will give any intellectual merit to and be fooled by your liesNow why doesn't the father get an equal opportunity to decide his child's fate, the truth be known there is no sustainable argument for it!
Actually, they are spontaneous abortions.Miscarriages are not abortions!
Well I shared a post about the actual benefits women receive from pregnancy so,,,,,, no! Again, she has the child, he is on the hook period, she doesn't want it, and he does, no choice. I am for men having the choice to keep the child if he wants it. See the issue is just because the woman carries it, she gets the only choice men should have equal rights.Well that's pretty simple.
After the act of sex, his biological part is done. She is in for 9 months of physical burden, an intense involvement in physical birth, and then years of care. Her involvement far exceeds his. If he wants to hang around and be a father, that is the right thing to do, but nothing requires him to do that. He might be required to pay expenses if he skips out or the marriage melts down. That's about it.
Yawn!Actually, they are spontaneous abortions.
The man doesn't have to carry the kid. Are you saying that they are married or not and did they use any form of birth control that failed?If a man, and a woman agree to consensual sex, and she gets pregnant, why, when the child is equally the mans, does he not get equal protection under the law, lets keep it scientific shall we, leave your emotion next to the tissues. WHY DOES HE NOT RECEIVE EQUAL RIGHTS
While that article you posted has no reference to pro-life, it does show him to be a great leader.“…Matt’s “Timely Justice Act” streamlined frivolous death penalty appeals and tripled the rate of executions in the months after its passage…” (snip)
Our exchange got me curious, so I looked around.
Go freaking figure. What a pro life champion.
https://www.mattgaetz.com/meet-matt
What science?nope thats YOUR claim about how YOU feel. actual facts and science were posted like you asked
hence why your retard claim got destroyed by multiple people, your thread title is based on any facts its based on your feelings LMAO
once again NOT the truth just more of your hilarious feelings that nobody honest, the educated objective will give any intellectual merit to and be fooled by your lies
that was answered repeatedly based on SCIENCE and FACTS, he doesn't get a say because the ZEF is no inside his body and the ZEF being present is NOT a risk to his health or life
Your claims fail again
as for equal I agree he should get equal rights AFTER the birth but there are factually no way to give him equal before hand
thansk for playing, now quick make another post based on your feelings that wont change anything
Not married. Why does he have no case they mutually agreed to have sex.The man doesn't have to carry the kid. Are you saying that they are married or not and did they use any form of birth control that failed?
If they weren't married he has no case.
If they used any birth control then the intent was to avoid pregnancy, he has no case.
Birth control can fail and women can die in childbirth. If the intent was to have a kid then they should have been married or had some other kind of contract.Not married. Why does he have no case they mutually agreed to have sex.
I do not care if they used, or didn't use birth control, it is a well known fact birth control can fail! They engaged in behavio that is known to cause pregnancy sometimes even with birth control!
Yeah, well, I get what you're saying but that is only seeing it from the male perspective. The female response to that could very well be men can have the same maternal rights when men can have babies.Well I shared a post about the actual benefits women receive from pregnancy so,,,,,, no! Again, she has the child, he is on the hook period, she doesn't want it, and he does, no choice. I am for men having the choice to keep the child if he wants it. See the issue is just because the woman carries it, she gets the only choice men should have equal rights.
And they could dieWhat science?
My claims continue to be valid!
Zef (Afrikaans: [ˈzɛf]) is a South African counter-culture movement. Kyle Hans Brockmann has compared zef counter-culture to many similar anarchic sub-cultures in the northern hemisphere.
Science, not emotion, says he is the child's father yet has no rights, you keep putting lipstick on that pig of an argument all you want. The issue of her carrying it is emotional, and I have posted the benefits during, and after pregnancy women receive, and you want to rob them of it.
Fair enough, and you’re Canadian
You have a point, and I might feel the same if I were Canadian.
That’s exactly how people in the poorest states with zero assistance are. If a poor woman needs assistance, it’s probably from a church. Being proselytized to is the “price of admission.” Very crime-and-punishment-y.
The poorer the state, the worse the outcome
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?