• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A Pentagon-wide email recently went out warning about Signal's vulnerability

He's a journalist. It is the governments job to ensure that they don't leak classified info. If a journalist receives the info without breaking a law, it is not the journalists fault, it is the fault of the idiot that handed it to him.


that's an interesting article because we also know

18 U.S.C. 798 protects national security by criminalizing unauthorized disclosure of government information. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."Oct 9, 2024



undermining the Presidency/US Govt is detrimental isn't it ?
 
that's an interesting article because we also know

18 U.S.C. 798 protects national security by criminalizing unauthorized disclosure of government information. Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."Oct 9, 2024



undermining the Presidency/US Govt is detrimental isn't it ?
No. But if it were, Trump is guilty of that, too. He's already guilty of multiple felonies, and has been indicted for scores more. What's one more felony on top of the last 100.

Which raises the age old question: "who is sleazier, the one who commits the atrocity, or the one who excuses/defends it?"
 
Last edited:
No. But if it were, Trump is guilty of that, too. He's already guilty of multiple felonies, and has been indicted indicted for several more. What's one more felony on top of the last 100.

Which raises the age old question: "who is sleazier, the one who commits the atrocity, or the one who excuses/defends it?"

at least Trump was POTUS and was privy to Classified intel

Goldberg never was, never has been
 
1743022126639.jpeg
Honest question: do you have the capacity to understand just how nonsensical that was? Or are you still just trolling? Nevermind. Don't answer.
 
Pretty sure maga don't need no Americans meddling in their affairs......

EiuG4oEWsAEhhV_


.......they can't have the "government" keeping records or knowing what comes next.
[Putin and I discussed ....]

It seems "Cadet Bone Spurs" is compromised—considering Helsinki, Moscow Trump Tower, the Russian bounty on U.S. soldiers, tax issues, and Trump’s debt to Deutsche Bank. With the Mueller report, multiple indictments, whistleblowers, and ongoing investigations, more details will likely emerge over time.

For now, it’s reasonable to suspect that Trump’s associates—as well as investigators like Mueller, Willis, and Smith—are well aware of their actions and the legal trouble they face. There’s a clear effort to hide critical information, avoiding subpoenas and withholding court records, tax filings, and bank loan details.

The full Mueller report, a public document, remains unreleased. My understanding is that Mueller provided a redacted version suitable for public release and that there’s a legal process for clearing grand jury information. While Barr was not required to release the unredacted report, we understand both the authority he had and how that authority was potentially abused.

This stonewalling resembles a child reluctant to show a bad report card.

If playboy bunnies, doormen, porn stars, and bodyguards have leverage over Trump, imagine the level of control professionals like Putin or the Saudis might have over him.
Stonewalling – behaving like a kid reluctantly showing a bad report card.


wsj(.)com/articles/trump-organization-subpoenaed-for-documents-related-to-stormy-daniels-hush-payment-11564702374
Why did Deutsche Bank keep lending to Donald Trump?
alternet(.)org/2019/05/why-did-deutsche-bank-keep-lending-to-donald-trump/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=237&recip_id=3919&list_id=2

“Russia has spent over $300 million on influencing foreign elections since 2014, US officials say”Trump Russia
cnn(.)com/2022/09/13/politics/russia-foreign-elections-influence/index.html

wsj(.)com/articles/trump-organization-subpoenaed-for-documents-related-to-stormy-daniels-hush-payment-11564702374
 
Back
Top Bottom