- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Haymarket, I explained it to. You seem to be the only one who doesn't get it.
Perhaps you gave me your opinion and I did not think it was valid. Or more likely, I have started a new job this week working for the State Legislature and it has occupied most of my time outside of a bit of lunch and computer time in a free moment. So if you would be kind enough to repeat it.
is this what you mean
Haymarket, I'm talking about the language being used now that people are "Constitution Lovers" and have a "Constitution fetish" as if being a proponent of the Constitution is somehow wrong or even...well...kinky. That indicates to me, contempt for the actual document.
I think you are taking a comment made with a bit of humor attached to it a bit too seriously. I do not take either as a sign of contempt to the actual document but more in making fun of somebody who is using the Constitution as I indicated for pure partisan and ideological purposes.
Last edited: