• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A case for teen pregnancy?

Pretty girls on birth control because they're going to be molested it's kind of messed up why don't we try and stop molesters from hurting them
We’ve been trying, you’ve been voting for a rapist.
 

Ages 18 to 24​

If ever there was a “best” age to procreate purely from a physical standpoint, this would be it.
Your body’s strongest ovarian follicles are the first to mature into eggs for ovulation, so the eggs you produce in your younger years are more likely to be high quality.
Having a child at this age will cut the risk for:
  • birth defects
  • chromosomal problems
  • some fertility issues

https://www.healthline.com/health/fertility-timeline#Ages-18-to-24
That might be the best biological age. But it's also probably near the worst if one considers educational, financial, social, and occupational resources or opportunities. Basing the time for procreation on biology alone is narrow minded thinking, if even that much. What is people's hangup with procreation anyway?
 
It’s to prevent unwanted pregnancy, dude.
Duh.
Stop thinking so much about the sex lives of children, you’re bad at it.
Underhanded attempts to suggest that I'm a pervert (and that is exactly what you are doing) is like a corned animal trying to look vicious.

Do you see no better way to signal that you're threatened than to do that.

Have an argument then you won't have to sink to such a despicable level.
 
That might be the best biological age. But it's also probably near the worst if one considers educational, financial, social, and occupational resources or opportunities. Basing the time for procreation on biology alone is narrow minded thinking, if even that much. What is people's hangup with procreation anyway?
Misogyny, religion, and xenophobia.
 
Duh.

Underhanded attempts to suggest that I'm a pervert (and that is exactly what you are doing) is like a corned animal trying to look vicious.

Do you see no better way to signal that you're threatened than to do that.

Have an argument then you won't have to sink to such a despicable level.
It's in no way underhanded. It's way out in the open when you talk about wild 13 year old sex parties because you can't have a normal conversation about birth control. What the **** is wrong with you?
 
The only reason people don't agree with your ideas is because of anonymous hatred? It can't possibly be because you're wrong huh that never happens.

😆
Many men still think women are to be owned as property and controlled. Many conservative men still reject the idea that a wife can be raped.

Organized religion is very patriarchal.

Xenophobes view women as little more than baby makers to make white babies because of their replacement theiory conspiracy theory.
 
Many men still think women are to be owned as property and controlled.
Yeah that's just for men now
Many conservative men still reject the idea that a wife can be raped.
More of the"conservatives are evil bogeymen" psychosis.
Organized religion is very patriarchal.
Yeah that dang enlightenment.
Xenophobes view women as little more than baby makers to make white babies because of their replacement theiory conspiracy theory.
Do they also eat puppies?
 
In her National Review article “When IVF Met MAHA,” (July 2025), Leah Libresco Sargeant questions President Trump’s rallying cry for free IVF (In Vitro Fertilization).

She argues, “The harder it is to marry and have children early in life, the more likely it is that couples will struggle to conceive later. A humane culture is ordered to the physical realities of women’s bodies. It does not view the shifting of births to later in life as neutral.”

If humans took measures to prevent whales or giraffes from getting pregnant when their bodies were ready, that would be considered madness and an offense against the natural world. But we think it’s ok to ignore Mother Nature and refuse to support human mothers who follow the rule of nature, which is to have children while still a teenager.

Ew, wtf.
 
The only reason people don't agree with your ideas is because of anonymous hatred? It can't possibly be because you're wrong huh that never happens.

😆
Correct, im never wrong. Anyone who disagrees with me is wrong by default. Glad you finally realize that.
 
Yeah that's just for men now

More of the"conservatives are evil bogeymen" psychosis.

Conservative males favor a caste society where men are in charge and women are property to be controlled. Re; Incels and Christian nationalists.
Yeah that dang enlightenment.
The Enlightenment was the rejection of religion as the power structure in society in favor of science and logic.
Do they also eat puppies?
Do you prefer metal, plastic, or wooden spoons to stir the pot?


Correct, im never wrong. Anyone who disagrees with me is wrong by default. Glad you finally realize that.
You're also very humble.
 
Conservative males favor a caste society where men are in charge and women are property to be controlled. Re; Incels and Christian nationalists.
😆 Incels. All those people getting married and having kids are Incels not the blue haired **** toys.

😆
The enlightenment was the rejection of religion as the power structure in society in favor of science and logic.
So it was lead by atheists?
Do you prefer metal, plastic, or wooden spoons to stir the pot?
Aww
You're also very humble.
The most humble. 😆
 
In her National Review article “When IVF Met MAHA,” (July 2025), Leah Libresco Sargeant questions President Trump’s rallying cry for free IVF (In Vitro Fertilization).
She argues, “The harder it is to marry and have children early in life, the more likely it is that couples will struggle to conceive later. A humane culture is ordered to the physical realities of women’s bodies. It does not view the shifting of births to later in life as neutral.”
If humans took measures to prevent whales or giraffes from getting pregnant when their bodies were ready, that would be considered madness and an offense against the natural world. But we think it’s ok to ignore Mother Nature and refuse to support human mothers who follow the rule of nature, which is to have children while still a teenager.
afaIct, Sargeant lacks credentials to add weight to her opinions about when childbirth is best for women.
Let's set that aside for now though



So, what are we talking here?
How are we to fund kids having kids?
UBI?
Raising the minimum wage to a living wage?
or....
 

Ages 18 to 24​

If ever there was a “best” age to procreate purely from a physical standpoint, this would be it.
Your body’s strongest ovarian follicles are the first to mature into eggs for ovulation, so the eggs you produce in your younger years are more likely to be high quality.
Having a child at this age will cut the risk for:
  • birth defects
  • chromosomal problems
  • some fertility issues

https://www.healthline.com/health/fertility-timeline#Ages-18-to-24

Why are you even thinking about teenage girls having sex?


.
 
Seems that both birth control and feminism have caused this issue. I've heard of people marketing birth control to 13 year old girls as a way to clear up acne so essentially some women are on progesterone for 20+ years. I think the idea is to prevent birth.

Good thing you need a doctor instead of marketer to get a prescription
 
In her National Review article “When IVF Met MAHA,” (July 2025), Leah Libresco Sargeant questions President Trump’s rallying cry for free IVF (In Vitro Fertilization).

She argues, “The harder it is to marry and have children early in life, the more likely it is that couples will struggle to conceive later. A humane culture is ordered to the physical realities of women’s bodies. It does not view the shifting of births to later in life as neutral.”

If humans took measures to prevent whales or giraffes from getting pregnant when their bodies were ready, that would be considered madness and an offense against the natural world. But we think it’s ok to ignore Mother Nature and refuse to support human mothers who follow the rule of nature, which is to have children while still a teenager.

This is an example of the pro-life opposition to IVF.

"‘Free IVF” is a strange rallying cry for President Donald Trump’s realignment. The pledge to become a “fertilization president” is not the same thing as a commitment to be pro-family. IVF is premised on the creation and destruction of embryonic children, some thrown out after genetic screening, others simply excess to requirements and left on ice indefinitely. A GOP that embraces IVF is obviously a problem for the pro-life faction of the conservative movement. For social conservatives broadly, IVF’s potential to create three-parent children (whether through surrogacy or mix-and-match gametogenesis) is a different kind of crisis."

Link
 
Back
Top Bottom