- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 101,206
- Reaction score
- 54,073
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Or maybe the guy was a drunken asshole teenager and groped a bunch of girls because lots of ****heads do that
I think that's the intended tactic. We hold the hearings, Nothing comes up. We close the hearings. We vote. Except we don't. A new accusation. Another new person to be heard. Another delay. Monday 10:00 passes. We vote. Except we don't. Another accusation. Another delay.
Or maybe the guy was a drunken asshole teenager and groped a bunch of girls because lots of ****heads do that
I, too, think lifetime appointments to the highest court in the land, one frequently accused of “activism by nine unelected people,” should proceed without absolute minimal diligence.
Grassely said it is over after 10AM Friday...Then 10pm Friday night.....or 3 pm Saturday....Maybe 1 AM Sunday......Definitely over....LOL
Having partisans like Avanatti enter the fray only makes it look (that much more) political. Just like this new accuser who wasnt sure of her 30 year old memories until she talked to a lawyer. Now she is certain beyond doubt and wants and FBI investigation. Everyone knows how lawyers are trained experts at retrieving lost memories and it is jst coincidence, of course, that he demand for the FBI to get involved is exactly what the dems want. If there was a doubt that this was a coordinated hit campaign against Kavanaugh before, that doubt has been removed.
You either recognize/remember an event, situation or idea described to you or you do not - there is no need to ponder for weeks or to have the matter investigated before you comment. My post to which you replied in about three minutes, is a prime example - did you make a snap judgement based on what was presented or did you ponder the matter carefully and have it investigated or did you simply reply with the first thing that popped into your head?
Yep, Grassley is definitely part of the problem, You are either in control or you are not - pretending to set 'deadlines' is worse than simply saying nothing at all.
Good....Us vs them...Blue vs Red...Welcome to the new America 2018...We will not give in to your "kind"..Not today, tomorrow or ever...Believe it
Yep, Grassley is definitely part of the problem, You are either in control or you are not - pretending to set 'deadlines' is worse than simply saying nothing at all.
Whomever is advising the judge has not served him well. His denial of events before they unfolded speaks to poor judgement. Not someone I want on the Supreme Court. I am speaking on the timeline of events; hell there are still three days + to go. Care to wager how things turn out?
I am also not standing for higher office............
Trump picks only the best people.
Farrow actually wrote a good piece in the New Yorker... He did not take sides. Read the whole thing, you'll see what I mean.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news...ege-years-deborah-ramirez?mbid=social_twitter
Hardly.....Up until recent times it took 60 votes to confirm a Supreme Court Justice...Now the insane partisanship (By both partys) has reduced it to 50...The founding fathers would be appalled.....Appalled to see a sitting President that lost the election by 3 million votes try to jam a Extreme Right Wing ideologue on the court...No surprise Millions say NO.and push back...Deal with it
I think he was bending over backward to accommodate Ford in the forlorn hope that he wouldn't be accused by ignoids of being an "old white man" (the insult of the moment).
Or maybe the guy was a drunken asshole teenager and groped a bunch of girls because lots of ****heads do that
Having partisans like Avanatti enter the fray only makes it look (that much more) political. Just like this new accuser who wasnt sure of her 30 year old memories until she talked to a lawyer. Now she is certain beyond doubt and wants and FBI investigation. Everyone knows how lawyers are trained experts at retrieving lost memories and it is jst coincidence, of course, that he demand for the FBI to get involved is exactly what the dems want. If there was a doubt that this was a coordinated hit campaign against Kavanaugh before, that doubt has been removed.
I don't think President Trump lost an election by 3 million votes. The final score was much closer than that, and I don't think it was President Trump that lost.
Watch and see...Maybe trump will tweet what a travesty this is...The woman is a Hillary bot leftist lying whore?...You'd like that wouldn't you?...But he won't...Because he like the rest of the GOP is .Running scared
Farrow actually wrote a good piece in the New Yorker... He did not take sides. Read the whole thing, you'll see what I mean.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news...ege-years-deborah-ramirez?mbid=social_twitter
In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved in the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and three other classmates, Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events: “We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale. We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about it—and we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Brett’s Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this.”
Are you speaking from experience? Must be because you certainly arent speaking based upon any evidence.
Drudge is reporting a 2nd woman supposedly is ready to come forward (re: Kavanaugh)
https://www.mediaite.com/online/dru...t-to-break-report-on-kavanaugh-another-woman/
So you have nothing to back the or else.
Why is denying involvement in things in which you were not involved a sign of bad judgement?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?