• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

900 pages

LMAO please keep posting factually wrong and retarded lies like that for all to see! That way honest, educated and objective posters can laugh at it each time:lamo
Always funny when a person related sexual orientation to bestiality and child rape etc its always an instant fail.


FACTS
Sexual orientation =/= pedophilia

Fact:
It will be funny if Pissburgh gets eliminated from the list of cities in the running for Amazon's second headquarters after this number.
 
Report is out in Pittsburgh Pa. about predator(gay) priests engaging in sex with young teen boys.
Sad to say priests today who are straight will take the heat...

https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/201...diocese-sex-abuse-grand-jury-report-released/

This is bad.
-Promoting child and possible black gay pornography.
-Making teen boys pose.
-Threats.
The liberal/Demos are loving this but sadly their fantasies are being exposed as well.

Oh, look at that:
“Priests were raping little boys and girls and the men of God who were responsible for them not only did nothing: they hid it all.”

Seems your obsession with teen boys is misguided.
 
Fact:
It will be funny if Pissburgh gets eliminated from the list of cities in the running for Amazon's second headquarters after this number.

LMAO Thank you for proving to use all that not only are you severely uneducated about what sexual orientation is but that you also dont know what a fact is.:lamo

If you disagree by all means PLEASE simply prove that either one of your claims are "facts" thanks!!
 
Just wondering... why did you put (gay) in there?

Because I for one have never heard of a priest (straight) abusing an underage girl.

Maybe it happens, but it's not the norm.
 
Report is out in Pittsburgh Pa. about predator(gay) priests engaging in sex with young teen boys.
Sad to say priests today who are straight will take the heat...

https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/201...diocese-sex-abuse-grand-jury-report-released/

This is bad.
-Promoting child and possible black gay pornography.
-Making teen boys pose.
-Threats.
The liberal/Demos are loving this but sadly their fantasies are being exposed as well.

2018 has been an odd year.

Various companies I have wanted to work at have been embroiled in sex scandals
The Republican Party has no morals or decency to the point where I am considering switching parties to Democrat
The current organization I work for is now embroiled in more sex scandals.
Despite all this Swampy is STILL President.
 
Straight priests have. Pedophiles do not usually care if female or male.....just that they are young.

I doubt that. Given that priests likely represent like non priests. I'm sure they have a preference.
 
Because I for one have never heard of a priest (straight) abusing an underage girl.

Maybe it happens, but it's not the norm.

If you read the report you will find it is common.

The report states:

• "Most of the victims were boys; but there were girls, too. Some were teens; many were prepubescent. Some were manipulated with alcohol or pornography. Some were made to masturbate their assailants, or were groped by them. Some were raped orally, some vaginally, some anally. But all of them were brushed aside, in every part of the state, by church leaders who preferred to protect the abusers and their institution above all."

"In the Diocese of Greensburg, a priest impregnated a 17-year-old, forged the head pastor's signature on a marriage certificate, then divorced the girl months later. Despite having sex with a minor, despite fathering a child, despite being married and being divorced, the priest was permitted to stay in ministry thanks to the diocese's efforts to find a 'benevolent bishop' in another state willing to take him on. Another priest, grooming his middle school students for oral sex, taught them how Mary had to 'bite off the cord' and 'lick' Jesus clean after he was born. It took another 15 years, and numerous additional reports of abuse, before the diocese finally removed the priest from ministry."

https://triblive.com/home/banners/13968118-74/a-pennsylvania-judge-on-tuesday-released-a-highly-anticipated-but-heavily-redacted
 
Because I for one have never heard of a priest (straight) abusing an underage girl.

Maybe it happens, but it's not the norm.

LMAO no matter your ignorance level on this topic

sexual orientation =/= pedophilia
 
This is a tough hurdle to get over. I hope this doesn't shake those who practice. Some will be outrage. Some will refuse comment. I imagine there is shock.
 
Who else would illegally cuddle up against a teen boy ? A straight priest would not do such a thing.

Let's see... the priests are all male. And the victims were boys. I guess you just think your readership are just too stupid to know much more?

Also... female teachers seem to keep getting caught cuddling up against teen boys.
 
I doubt that. Given that priests likely represent like non priests. I'm sure they have a preference.
Yeah,teen boys.
 
Because I for one have never heard of a priest (straight) abusing an underage girl.

Maybe it happens, but it's not the norm.

First line of the OP:

Report is out in Pittsburgh Pa. about predator(gay) priests engaging in sex with young teen boys.​

See the two bolded players in this scenario? For some reason the OP thought it wasn't enough to clue off the reader to the type of sex that was occurring here. Was just wondering why (gay) had to be added to what was already known from the description.
 
Let's see... the priests are all male. And the victims were boys. I guess you just think your readership are just too stupid to know much more?

Also... female teachers seem to keep getting caught cuddling up against teen boys.

Insults I see. Irrelevant responses are not necessary.
 
Insults I see. Irrelevant responses are not necessary.

What insult? You insulted your reader by believing they are too stupid to know that teen boys are boys and priests are men.
 
First line of the OP:

Report is out in Pittsburgh Pa. about predator(gay) priests engaging in sex with young teen boys.​

See the two bolded players in this scenario? For some reason the OP thought it wasn't enough to clue off the reader to the type of sex that was occurring here. Was just wondering why (gay) had to be added to what was already known from the description.

Dude, there are several stories regarding priests and girls in the report too, read pages 20-26
 
What insult? You insulted your reader by believing they are too stupid to know that teen boys are boys and priests are men.

Perhaps you gotten insulted.

Quoting...
"teen boys are boys and priests are men "
Thanks for letting the reader know. This is insulting. Not a bad twist of words.
 
Report is out in Pittsburgh Pa. about predator(gay) priests engaging in sex with young teen boys.
Sad to say priests today who are straight will take the heat...

https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/201...diocese-sex-abuse-grand-jury-report-released/

This is bad.
-Promoting child and possible black gay pornography.
-Making teen boys pose.
-Threats.
The liberal/Demos are loving this but sadly their fantasies are being exposed as well.

Awful, the Catholic Church needs to get this crap under control, Period.
 
Awful, the Catholic Church needs to get this crap under control, Period.
Just when you think it's safe to go into the water another situation pops up. As for getting this under control I don't see this happening any time soon.
 
There really needs to be a breakdown of age and gender of the victims to determine the prevalence of pedophilia, straight men chasing after plaid skirts or gay men getting their freak on.
 
Happens? Further research by me indicates it does. Common, not so much. Psychology Today suggests about a 5 times swing. Which the opposite of conventional pedophilia.

I stand corrected. I heard much of female violations.

Yeah, I'm reading through the report. I've also read through much of the Los Angeles Diocese, most of the abuse was with boys, but there are many with girls.

One of the many reasons I left the church, I am very lucky nothing happened to me, but, the more I look back, the more I realize that the Byzantine priest was a real sick man. We were in high school, we worked there in the summer, mowing lawns, cleaning, etc. The priest had a keg of beer in the house, let us drink, he had some soft core stuff like drink glasses with nude women on them, etc. What bothered me is that he would frequently house families that needed help, one had several boys. I've tried to get info, but its all confidential, all I know is that he had 7 valid complaints against him.
 
Dude, there are several stories regarding priests and girls in the report too, read pages 20-26

I've absolutely no doubt that that happens probably even more than with young boys. Just pointing out the OP's homophobia is quite loud.
 
Back
Top Bottom