Passing a clean cr would be doing their job but Boehner won't take a vote. This could all be over.
OK...
If he does he's fired...
"No" is a pretty powerful word........
Obamacare opens the door to dictation of life by the government as you know it...
With an army of Lois Lerners holding all the keys to treatment
Registered Republican? I'm sorry we can't afford that life saving surgery right now.
Bronson the scariest part of all for me is discovering how many people in our society that put so much trust in the federal government. Only a moron would think it be a good idea to have the IRS in control of implementing healthcare. Yet there are 47 separate Obamacare provisions that require involvement from the agency. To give this agency such power is the stupidest dang thing I've ever seen. But the sheeple shuffle along eating it up. These folks must be walking around with just a couple of neurons still firing in their brains and unfortunately they still have a right to vote.
Doesn't matter. They are the cause of the shutdown.
And that is what is wrong.Why? Each time, they vote to take Obamacare off the table and send it back.
Hyperbole, or did you go to the streets calling the SCOTUS out for treason when they overturned DOMA?
No, the manner in which Obamacare was passed, the actions of the IRS and the Justice of the Peace investigations of AP and James Rosen, attacking Libya without congressional approval, the lies about Benghazi, the practices of the NSA........I can show you multiple acts of treason from this administration.
Many people don't acknowledge Obamacare as legitimate law because of the Al Capone nature of its passing. Chicago politics don't fly nationally.
LOL What laws were broken passing the AHC act?
You don't think a law this massive, expensive, and all-consuming should require the standard 60 Senate votes? You're OK with a simple majority drawn purely on partisan lines through a technical procedure created for entirely different purposes?
Obama studied the Constitution not because he wanted to uphold it. He studied so he could get around it and destroy it.
Not liking how it was passed is a reason to repeal it.That is not a reason to repeal it
Not liking how it was passed is a reason to repeal it.
Not liking the legislation itself, is another.
You do not decide if the "whys" are sufficient enough.
The sooner the better, but we do have years.You better get cracking then. You will need a Senate super-majority and the Whitehouse to have any chance at repeal. That's the way our system works. Good luck we are all counting on you.
The Supreme court is the highest in the land. They cannot commit treason.
The rules of the Senate were followed to a T. You're just mad because you don't like it. That is not a reason to repeal it unless you think you are a King. This country was formed so Kings like you would not get their way. You'd think you would have known that if you are a citizen here.
:lamo wow :lamoThe Supreme court is the highest in the land. They cannot commit treason.
The rules of the Senate were followed to a T. You're just mad because you don't like it. That is not a reason to repeal it unless you think you are a King. This country was formed so Kings like you would not get their way. You'd think you would have known that if you are a citizen here.
That's the typical reaction of a 9 year old.
As for the kids with cancer, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday on the consequences of cuts to the National Institutes of Health: "Director Francis Collins said about 200 patients who otherwise would be admitted to the NIH Clinical Center for clinical trials each week will be turned away. This includes about 30 children, most of them cancer patients, he said."
The Washington Post's left-liberal Wonkblog picked up the story: "As long as the government is shut down, the National Institutes of Health will turn away roughly 200 patients each week from its clinical research center, including children with cancer."
Healio.com reports that the House today passed a bill to restore NIH funding--but Obama has already issued a veto threat. Yesterday, as the Washington Free Beacon notes, CNN's Dana Bash asked Reid about it at a press conference:
Bash: You all talked about children with cancer unable to go to clinical trials. The House is presumably going to pass a bill that funds at least the NIH. Given what you've said, will you at least pass that? And if not, aren't you playing the same political games that Republicans are?Reid: Listen, Sen. Durbin explained that very well, and he did it here, did it on the floor earlier, as did Sen. Schumer. What right did they have to pick and choose what part of government is going to be funded? It's obvious what's going on here. You talk about reckless and irresponsible. Wow. What this is all about is ObamaCare. They are obsessed. I don't know what other word I can use. They're obsessed with this ObamaCare. It's working now and it will continue to work and people will love it more than they do now by far. So they have no right to pick and choose.Bash: But if you can help one child who has cancer, why wouldn't you do it?Reid: Why would we want to do that? I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own. This is--to have someone of your intelligence to suggest such a thing maybe means you're irresponsible and reckless--Bash: I'm just asking a question.
Obamacare is an unconstitutional fascist disaster
You should be thanking Republicans for standing up for liberty
Do you even know what fascism is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?