• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

9/11 Was an Inside Job

Here is a audio of a talk show in Arizona, they are interviewing the Research Editor of Popular Mechanic Magazine. The magazine wrote articles debunking the 911 myths, keep in mind that popular Mechanic is owned by Hearst. Hearst's newspapers propaganda influenced public opinion leading up to the Spanish American war. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish-American_War Also here is a video of a British news report that reported bulding 7 collapsing 23 min. before it happened. What is interesting is that they cut to their reporter in New York and as they are talking about bulding 7 you can see it still standing in the back ground through the window. After a few min. they break away from the reporter.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqqhX8gkhE0&mode=related&search=Jim
 
porsteamboy said:
Here is a audio of a talk show in Arizona, they are interviewing the Research Editor of Popular Mechanic Magazine. The magazine wrote articles debunking the 911 myths, keep in mind that popular Mechanic is owned by Hearst. Hearst's newspapers propaganda influenced public opinion leading up to the Spanish American war. Spanish-American War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Click to expand...

So ofcourse they're in on it too right? I mean it's not like just about every major news organization was guilty of Jingoism after the sinking of the Maine right? Nahhhh. :roll: At least you didn't pull out the bullshit about Michael Chertoff being related to Chris Chertoff.

Also here is a video of a British news report that reported bulding 7 collapsing 23 min. before it happened. What is interesting is that they cut to their reporter in New York and as they are talking about bulding 7 you can see it still standing in the back ground through the window. After a few min. they break away from the reporter.YouTube - BBC REPORTED WTC - 7 COLLAPSED 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT FELL!
Click to expand...

Yep this video just happened to be found after the BBC debunked the truthers bullshit in a documentary and it just happens to be clearly edited, and the last time that video was updated just happens to be the date the documentary came out. It's a ****ing hoax truther the video was made on february 26th, 2007 its not a live broadcast from 9/11 it's a mixture of old and new footages.
 
Last edited:
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
So ofcourse they're in on it too right? I mean it's not like just about every major news organization was guilty of Jingoism after the sinking of the Maine right? Nahhhh. :roll: At least you didn't pull out the bullshit about Michael Chertoff being related to Chris Chertoff.



Yep this video just happened to be found after the BBC debunked the truthers bullshit in a documentary and it just happens to be clearly edited, and the last time that video was updated just happens to be the date the documentary came out. It's a ****ing hoax truther the video was made on february 26th, 2007 its not a live broadcast from 9/11 it's a mixture of old and new footages.
Click to expand...
I'm not a truther big guy, I really don't care if it was an inside job, there is nothing you can do if it was. I just passed info along and let experts like you figure it out. However I did run across this http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/part_of_the_conspiracy_2.html So I guess, as you say the film is a hoax, isn't true. The BBC editors say it is true, they reported it early and came up with a reasonable explanation, if bad reporting is resonable.
 
Scott said:
When I look at the evidence, all I can think is that it was an inside job.

Look at this frame of the video of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.hongpong.com/lib/images/plane77_contrast_adj.jpg

The nose is too pointed to be the nose of a 757. The shadow line is visible on the underside and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.

Stop this video at the 21 second mark. It's the same picture but a little sharper.
CNN.com - First video of Pentagon 9/11 attack released - May 16, 2006

In the second post on this page there is a picture.
Loose Change Forum -> A 757 Does Not Fit
(Sometimes the picture takes a while to appear during peak internet use)

The hole in the Pentagon looks too small to have been made by a 757.
This analysis is consistent with the evidence.
Physics911, by Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven, 9/11/2001

There's a big debate going on about this.

Loose Change Forum
Loose Change Website - Version 2.0
911 Truth Seekers-9/11 Blog

I think the picture of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon and the picture of the hole in the Pentagon before the collapse close the whole case.
Click to expand...
well of course, your very liberal youll take whatever you can and throw it against the bush administration, go be a follower like every other liberal.
 
even as a leftist, i see the 9/11 was an inside job theory as completely false. Most of the evidence 9/11 truthers use is skewed. Loose Change, the most well known documentry that supports this is filled with an alarming number of errors and the idea that a kerosine fire cant melt steel is completly false.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom