• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927:2293]

Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
Thank you so very much for your opinion.

The fact of complete destruction +
the speed of destruction, points to CD
WTC towers & 7

and thats the way it is ..........

( thank U Walter )
Click to expand...

That is one conclusion... another is that it points to a situation that was naturally occurring and that never happened before.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
Thank you so very much for your opinion.

The fact of complete destruction +
the speed of destruction, points to CD
WTC towers & 7

and thats the way it is ..........

( thank U Walter )
Click to expand...

Then prove it. If you are right that should be simple enough.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

Mark F said:
Then prove it. If you are right that should be simple enough.
Click to expand...

Quite simple indeed,
observe the speed of "collapse"
the symmetry of the event,
the fact of complete & total destruction.
and there you have it.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
Quite simple indeed,
observe the speed of "collapse"
the symmetry of the event,
the fact of complete & total destruction.
and there you have it.
Click to expand...

You do realise that none of that would stand up as evidence before an enquiry?
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

NWO_Spook said:
You do realise that none of that would stand up as evidence before an enquiry?
Click to expand...

That is YOUR opinion! Your appeals to authority ( etc .... ) do nothing to change the truth of this matter, the destruction of the towers & 7 clearly indicates by the speed of destruction + the uniformity of the event + the totality of the destruction that this had to have been an engineered event.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
That is YOUR opinion!
Click to expand...

And clearly it is correct or Gage would have been able to launch the case he uses as an excuse to garnish donations from the gullible. Why hasn't 9/11 truth taken this so-called evidence to court if it is so compelling?

Your appeals to authority ( etc .... ) do nothing to change the truth of this matter, the destruction of the towers & 7 clearly indicates by the speed of destruction + the uniformity of the event + the totality of the destruction that this had to have been an engineered event.
Click to expand...

That is YOUR opinion! Can you see why that is such a banal response? Despite your argument from incredulity, no-one has ever proved your contention. Hmmm....why is that?
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

NWO_Spook said:
And clearly it is correct or Gage would have been able to launch the case he uses as an excuse to garnish donations from the gullible. Why hasn't 9/11 truth taken this so-called evidence to court if it is so compelling?



That is YOUR opinion! Can you see why that is such a banal response? Despite your argument from incredulity, no-one has ever proved your contention. Hmmm....why is that?
Click to expand...

There have been several really good cases, that the courts have refused to even hear
thus proving beyond any doubt that the system is very sick.

The court of public opinion needs to weigh in on this one and deliver the verdict
that the corrupt system will not even discuss.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
There have been several really good cases, that the courts have refused to even hear
thus proving beyond any doubt that the system is very sick.

The court of public opinion needs to weigh in on this one and deliver the verdict
that the corrupt system will not even discuss.
Click to expand...

What actions have you taken to find justice for Abu Ghaith? Seems you would do something to assist in overturning the verdice from a "corrupt system".
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
Quite simple indeed,
observe the speed of "collapse"
Click to expand...

Please describe in detail, with examples why speed is important, what is supposed to prove and what it is supposed to rule out and how.

the symmetry of the event,
Click to expand...

Please define this alleged symmetry and again explain why it is important, what it is supposed to prove and what it is supposed to rule out and how.

the fact of complete & total destruction.
and there you have it.
Click to expand...

What level of incomplete destruction do you find acceptable and why? What precisely is the cut-off point?

Please start thinking and stop rattling off the same tired old meaningless slogans and catch-phrases.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

Mark F said:
Please describe in detail, with examples why speed is important, what is supposed to prove and what it is supposed to rule out and how.



Please define this alleged symmetry and again explain why it is important, what it is supposed to prove and what it is supposed to rule out and how.



What level of incomplete destruction do you find acceptable and why? What precisely is the cut-off point?

Please start thinking and stop rattling off the same tired old meaningless slogans and catch-phrases.
Click to expand...

wow a whole list of irrelevant red herrings in one post
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
That is YOUR opinion! Your appeals to authority ( etc .... ) do nothing to change the truth of this matter, the destruction of the towers & 7 clearly indicates by the speed of destruction + the uniformity of the event + the totality of the destruction that this had to have been an engineered event.
Click to expand...

yeh 3 demolition experts said it was a demolition and he appeals to authority for everything else but not this whats up with that? Oh thats right confirmation bias
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

NWO_Spook said:
And clearly it is correct or Gage would have been able to launch the case he uses as an excuse to garnish donations from the gullible. Why hasn't 9/11 truth taken this so-called evidence to court if it is so compelling?

That is YOUR opinion! Can you see why that is such a banal response? Despite your argument from incredulity, no-one has ever proved your contention. Hmmm....why is that?
Click to expand...

they are
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

mike2810 said:
What actions have you taken to find justice for Abu Ghaith? Seems you would do something to assist in overturning the verdice from a "corrupt system".
Click to expand...

So by innuendo, If I'm not actively involved in some sort of effort to seek justice,
then I'm somehow lacking in commitment to the cause. .... like, ya, right ......

The fact is, until the court of public opinion is able to weigh in on this subject
nothing will be accomplished ..... just lots of complaining from both sides.
what a waste!
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
So by innuendo, If I'm not actively involved in some sort of effort to seek justice,
then I'm somehow lacking in commitment to the cause. .... like, ya, right ......

The fact is, until the court of public opinion is able to weigh in on this subject
nothing will be accomplished ..... just lots of complaining from both sides.
what a waste!
Click to expand...

So was the jury correct in covicting Abu Ghaith?

By the way the court of public opinion has weigh in on the subject. Abu was found guilty. The govt. did not do 9/11.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

mike2810 said:
So was the jury correct in covicting Abu Ghaith?

By the way the court of public opinion has weigh in on the subject. Abu was found guilty. The govt. did not do 9/11.
Click to expand...

the fat lady isn't even warming up as yet........
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
the fat lady isn't even warming up as yet........
Click to expand...

Your so convince with all of your non answers.:mrgreen:

and the wtc 1,2 and 7 were fire induced collapse.

Now. Which one of the CT alternatives will you say is not correct.

- energy beam (J. Woods)
- nanothermite ( Jones)
- neutron bombs (Prager)

They all can't be correct.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
There have been several really good cases, that the courts have refused to even hear
thus proving beyond any doubt that the system is very sick.
Click to expand...

Does it prove the system is very sick, or more reasonably, that the cases were very weak? Why did you automatically reach that conclusion?
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

KokomoJojo said:
yeh 3 demolition experts said it was a demolition and he appeals to authority for everything else but not this whats up with that? Oh thats right confirmation bias
Click to expand...


What a load of idiotic and illiterate crap. Three whackjobs out of how many and you accuse me of confirmation bias? Priceless! I know how difficult the English language is for you, but do you understand the term?
 
Last edited:
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

CATiwampus said:
the fat lady isn't even warming up as yet........
Click to expand...

Fat lady has finished, been to the after show party and gone home to bed, Truthers missed the show and spend all their time whining about it.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

Quag said:
Fat lady has finished, been to the after show party and gone home to bed, Truthers missed the show and spend all their time whining about it.
Click to expand...

I find it interesting that very few are willing to rule out any alternative explanation. The Judy Woods particle beam explanation does not have much support on causing the WTC to collapse. Yet, Cati and others won't dismiss the alternative. Truthers won't come out and defend Abu Ghaith as wrongly found guilty. That speaks volumes to what they consider evidence.
 
Re: 9/11 - Did the Towers Fall At Free-Fall Speeds? [W:912, 927]

mike2810 said:
I find it interesting that very few are willing to rule out any alternative explanation. The Judy Woods particle beam explanation does not have much support on causing the WTC to collapse. Yet, Cati and others won't dismiss the alternative. Truthers won't come out and defend Abu Ghaith as wrongly found guilty. That speaks volumes to what they consider evidence.
Click to expand...

The less specific they get the easier it is to maintain the fiction. This also explains why no Truther will attempt to come up with a well-reasoned, comprehensive hypothesis for what they believe happened that day based on the evidence. It would force them to vet the quality of their own arguments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom