• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

9/11 - AI agrees, WTC7 collapse was not the result of what we were told

commonsense101

New member
Joined
May 15, 2025
Messages
16
Reaction score
13
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
After recently watching Former congressman Weldon on Tucker and other shows, I decided to dive deeper in to my long held suspicions with respect to the official narrative of the WTC 7 collapse.
The first thing I did, was ansked AI what the cause of the collapse was, and if it believed the official narrative. Of course, it spit back the conspiracy theory claims when supporting the official narrative.
I then obtained the entire NIST detailed report, and I also obtained the final report from University of Fairbanks Alaska, and all supplemental modeling data.
I uploaded all of it to an Open AI system, and proceeded to have it analyze both reports and all supplemental data,. I then asked it to evaluate based solely on the data, and not on media narratives, or outside biases.
The responses I got were pretty impressive.
It drew the conclusions that the government NIST report was inaccurate and misleading. It also concluded that it was incorrect, and that the only known cause for the collapse would be from a controlled demolition
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0720.webp
    IMG_0720.webp
    56.2 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_0722.webp
    IMG_0722.webp
    55.3 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_0720.webp
    IMG_0720.webp
    56.2 KB · Views: 8
After recently watching Former congressman Weldon on Tucker and other shows, I decided to dive deeper in to my long held suspicions with respect to the official narrative of the WTC 7 collapse.
The first thing I did, was ansked AI what the cause of the collapse was, and if it believed the official narrative. Of course, it spit back the conspiracy theory claims when supporting the official narrative.
I then obtained the entire NIST detailed report, and I also obtained the final report from University of Fairbanks Alaska, and all supplemental modeling data.
I uploaded all of it to an Open AI system, and proceeded to have it analyze both reports and all supplemental data,. I then asked it to evaluate based solely on the data, and not on media narratives, or outside biases.
The responses I got were pretty impressive.
It drew the conclusions that the government NIST report was inaccurate and misleading. It also concluded that it was incorrect, and that the only known cause for the collapse would be from a controlled demolition

I gave you your first like!

MAGA.
 
I’ve got some damning info on Soros Open Society also. Went through the 600 pages of tax returns and found crystal clear evidence of perjury,
 
I’ve got some damning info on Soros Open Society also. Went through the 600 pages of tax returns and found crystal clear evidence of perjury,

If only real investigators and prosecutors had figured this out sooner.
 
After recently watching Former congressman Weldon on Tucker and other shows, I decided to dive deeper in to my long held suspicions with respect to the official narrative of the WTC 7 collapse.
The first thing I did, was ansked AI what the cause of the collapse was, and if it believed the official narrative. Of course, it spit back the conspiracy theory claims when supporting the official narrative.
I then obtained the entire NIST detailed report, and I also obtained the final report from University of Fairbanks Alaska, and all supplemental modeling data.
I uploaded all of it to an Open AI system, and proceeded to have it analyze both reports and all supplemental data,. I then asked it to evaluate based solely on the data, and not on media narratives, or outside biases.
The responses I got were pretty impressive.
It drew the conclusions that the government NIST report was inaccurate and misleading. It also concluded that it was incorrect, and that the only known cause for the collapse would be from a controlled demolition
Sure you did.
 
We may never know who is correct. There are issues with the Alaska U study. hulseys report is just a theory.






 
1748366593718.webp

Based on this graphic, it would be hard for the North Tower NOT to have damaged WTC7. A 110 story building falling less than a block from a 47 story building?

As to the OP. You put far more faith in AI than I do.

Explosives? Really? Do you have any idea how much explosives would have to be in 7 to bring it down? And the time to set it, rig it, and ignite it? Try weeks, if not months. Additionally, based on the premise here, they would had to do this in 5 hours after the first impact of the jets.
 
Last edited:
If only real investigators and prosecutors had figured this out sooner.

they did, that is why the like Investigating them selves.

they don't like you investigating them, so read the 911 report and stop asking revealing questions. or we put you on a Watch List.

it amazes me how the sheep can't see more than an inch deep, but the Oligarchs have dumbed us down enuf to just believe them whenever they spout out their continuous Propaganda reports.


blessings all.

.
 
After recently watching Former congressman Weldon on Tucker and other shows, I decided to dive deeper in to my long held suspicions with respect to the official narrative of the WTC 7 collapse.
The first thing I did, was ansked AI what the cause of the collapse was, and if it believed the official narrative. Of course, it spit back the conspiracy theory claims when supporting the official narrative.
I then obtained the entire NIST detailed report, and I also obtained the final report from University of Fairbanks Alaska, and all supplemental modeling data.
I uploaded all of it to an Open AI system, and proceeded to have it analyze both reports and all supplemental data,. I then asked it to evaluate based solely on the data, and not on media narratives, or outside biases.
The responses I got were pretty impressive.
It drew the conclusions that the government NIST report was inaccurate and misleading. It also concluded that it was incorrect, and that the only known cause for the collapse would be from a controlled demolition
This shit again?

9/11 happened just as we all witnessed. 2 commercial planes flew into the WTC, destroying most of it. Another commercial plane struck the Pentagon and a 4th Commercial jet crashed in a field after passengers wrestled with terrorists to gain control.
 
This shit again?

9/11 happened just as we all witnessed. 2 commercial planes flew into the WTC, destroying most of it. Another commercial plane struck the Pentagon and a 4th Commercial jet crashed in a field after passengers wrestled with terrorists to gain control.
Some people never learn

1748393379727.webp
 
This shit again?

9/11 happened just as we all witnessed. 2 commercial planes flew into the WTC, destroying most of it. Another commercial plane struck the Pentagon and a 4th Commercial jet crashed in a field after passengers wrestled with terrorists to gain control.

well sure. you have been Programmed well and this is exactly what they want you to think.

best not to over think it and leave the Thinking to those pulling the strings.


william casey has a special place in his heart for those who have been educated by the System. please don't let him down....


ci  aaa.webp


.
 
Went through the 600 pages of tax returns and found crystal clear evidence of perjury,

Maybe you should go golfing... or take a hike or something...



.
 
This shit again?

9/11 happened just as we all witnessed. 2 commercial planes flew into the WTC, destroying most of it. Another commercial plane struck the Pentagon and a 4th Commercial jet crashed in a field after passengers wrestled with terrorists to gain control.

But holographic jets and pre-planted demolition charges!!!


;
 
and more…. Will be posting the details soon. Saw you were maga so I figured I’d respond

I aske ChatGPT this:

should we have faith that AI is correct


And ChatGPT said:

We shouldn’t have faith that AI is correct—what we need is critical thinking.

AI can be useful, fast, and impressively accurate in many tasks, but it’s not infallible. It doesn’t "know" things in the human sense; it predicts based on patterns in data. That means it can:


  • Get facts wrong
  • Misunderstand context
  • Reflect bias in its training data
  • Sound confident while being completely wrong
So instead of faith, what we should use is skepticism and verification. If an AI gives you an answer—check it. Especially if it involves important decisions, real-world consequences, or controversial claims.

Think of AI like a smart calculator or assistant: helpful, but not to be blindly trusted.

 
well sure. you have been Programmed well and this is exactly what they want you to think.

best not to over think it and leave the Thinking to those pulling the strings.


william casey has a special place in his heart for those who have been educated by the System. please don't let him down....


View attachment 67571883
🤪

It was what we saw. There was no controlled demolition. There were 4 passenger jets. The structural damage caused by the north tower, along with fire, brought down building 7, which took 14 seconds to fall, not 7, as Truthers often falsely claim.
 
Back
Top Bottom