- Joined
- Sep 25, 2008
- Messages
- 3,082
- Reaction score
- 744
- Location
- New Orleans
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Out of fairness, it would be extremely helpful if somebody had a list of the percentage of students that take each respective test by state. States with a lower percentage of students taking a test are more likely to have higher scores, especially when this is not the norm. This is due to the fact that SAT and ACT tests are not a random sampling, they are comprised of the most motivated and academically prepared students among their peers. When students take the SAT in an ACT dominated region, this would mean they are appealing to schools outside that region- often times private schools in the northeast or larger state schools out west. And if you want to link politics in, those eastern private schools tend to have top notch programs in poli sci, humanities, and business, programs that rely more upon history than larger state schools, which tend to have a bigger balance with science and engineering programs.
Well when you read from maps like this it's no surprise.
Even fewer seem to know who the first Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico was. Its a sad state of affairs I tell you.
This is all completely true. The links with those numbers are provided toward the beginning of the thread, but as you point out, it's almost impossible to put the two together and come out with a comparable conclusion.
If watching fox (which once made a foolish gaffe re: map) means that the viewers are all dumb, then I guess that watching MSNBC (which once made a foolish gaffe re: name) means the viewers are all racist.
Right?
Does anyone else notice that they are the whitest states in the country?
It's also factually incorrect. But carry on with your delusions.
How racist of you to say such an offensive thing! To suggest that white people score higher on standardized testing is an awful (and completely correct) thing to say!:mrgreen:
It's also factually incorrect. But carry on with your delusions.
No, I'm suggesting that Caucasians aren't the ones scoring the highest.I'm sorry? Are you suggesting that different ethnicity do not score differently on average on standardized testing scores?
SAT Ethnic Group Scores
American Indian---482/480 (962)
Asian American-----575/508 (1083)
African American-----426/431 (857)
Puerto Rican----457/448 (905)
Other Hispanic----464/457 (921)
White-----534/529 (1063)
Other ----513/501 (1014)
Average ACT Composite Score by Race
African American ----16.9
American Indian---18.7
Caucasian---- 21.7
Mexican American----18.3
Asian American---- 21.8
Hispanic----19.0
Other ----19.3
Multiracial-----20.9
Prefer Not to Respond -----21.8
No Response-----20.1
No, I'm suggesting that Caucasians aren't the ones scoring the highest.
See what happens when you make assumptions?
:roflI never said they were scoring the highest. That was a false assumption you made. I said they were scoring higher and by that I meant higher than the average minority. Asians may score higher, yes, but they only account for a little more than 4% of the population. Whites, on the other hand, account for more than 70% of the population. So when it comes down to it, yes Asian students make an impact on the average score, but Whites obviously have a greater one.
:rofl
Great save ...
I'm not interested in arguing your doublespeak with you. Semantic gymnastics bore me.Do you have something to actually say? Please, point out where you think I originally erred and was forced to make up for it. Or just admit that you misread what I had originally posted.
I would agree with you.Off topic, but would the continental congress be considered a past government of our current nation? I guess I always though of that period as a transitional authority, and that the history of the (current) U.S. didn't start until after the revolution and the United States was recognized abroad. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
Good call. Feeding noobs is never safe.I'm not interested in arguing your doublespeak with you. Semantic gymnastics bore me.
Sorry to get your little hopes up.
See it at 75 Percent of Oklahoma Students Can't Name the First President.
This real folks, and no one seems to mind....
The majority of Americans are against health care reform you say?
The majority of Americans don't know who George Washington is either...
I got a kick out of this anectode regarding the students in one of the most conservative states in America as well:
"About 92 percent of the people who take the citizenship test pass on their first try, according to immigration service data. However, Oklahoma students did not fare as well. Only about 3 percent of the students surveyed would have passed the citizenship test."
11 percent also thought the two major political parties in the US were Communists and Republicans. Source: Here
Again, since when did SAT scores measure intelligence?
As for the other notion of kids being otherwise ignorant, fact regurgitation won't get you far in life (unless you're a professional Jeopardy player, but that guy is a nerd). The real failure of schools and students is getting kids to learn to critically think. Facts by themselves are mush. And mush is no good.
If people didn't prep for the SAT, it would actually be a very good test of intelligence.
Off topic, but would the continental congress be considered a past government of our current nation? I guess I always though of that period as a transitional authority, and that the history of the (current) U.S. didn't start until after the revolution and the United States was recognized abroad. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
That's not what my statement said. I was making a joke about the map. But if you want to play the MSNBC/Fox gaffe lets not forget about Mark Foley being a democrat and another. You do know the guy's name is Niger Innis the double G being a mistake albeit an understandable one. Calling Iraq, Iran is more than a gaffe. The point being I was making a joke about Maps and you turned it racial
You do know the guy's name is Niger Innis the double G being a mistake albeit an understandable one. Calling Iraq, Iran is more than a gaffe.
MSNBC makes a 1 letter mistake = understandable gaffe, no problem.
Fox makes a 1 letter mistake = OMG so dumbz!
One denotes a typo. The other denotes a lack of geographical knowledge. Its easy to screw up the guys name. Now Iran and Iraq the ending letter is spread apart on the keyboard. Not knowing the difference on a map is pretty bad. It takes actual effort to mislabel a map
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?