In a highly edited video, it could mean a lot of things. Like someone who is describing a part of their job description and skills.... Because after-all, I would think a non-profit would like a diversified revenue stream.... Afterall it is a non-profit and relies on donoations, and grants to survive... Especially because following her comment of "diversification of the revenue stream", she essentially is talking about boring hiring practices, what actually brings in some $$ and what doesnt (oh yea she doesnt mention fetal tissue sales as a big $$$ producer), benefit packages for employees, and then goes into talking about where most stem cell research happens (in California) because of 3 major research facilities out there, and then talks about how she is frustrated her research and data isnt collected and shared among other researchers like the ones in California, and then she goes into how small Planned Parenthood is, and how she tries to share her research with all those involved in research PP nationally, and then the get into an argument about if Texas has a fetal tissue program. So yea. Pretty boring stuff.
Ummmmm from Gonzalez v Carhart
"As we have noted, the Act does not proscribe D&E....In addition the Act's prohibition only applies to the delivery of "a living fetus." 18 U. S. C. §1531(b)(1)(A) (2000 ed., Supp. IV). If the intact D&E procedure is truly necessary in some circumstances, it appears likely an injection that kills the fetus is an alternative under the Act that allows the doctor to perform the procedure." http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/550/124.html#sthash.KP2A9JYW.dpuf"..
I mean the circumstances where a D&E and when intact abortion using the D&E procedure is known as a IDX and that is what they talk about in much of the video when talking about "procedure", "when is it permitted to use such procedure", etc and they talk about it alot in the uncensored video and when putten in proper context and in an unedited way, its nothing really illegal... I mean you can see here
http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PPGCtranscript04092015_final.pdf where is the guilt? The law breaking?
Oh yea they dont change the procedure or standards or whatever: "no alteration in the timing of the termination of the pregnancy, or the method used was made for obtaining the tissue... but we can't delay an abortion in order to get a later gestation. Of course, that's unethical or anything that's going to put her at risk in terms of "no alteration was made in terms of the timing of the termination or the method used." So if we're going to be doing a surgical procedure, the surgical procedure is going to be the same. We're not going to say hey, let's experiment with giving you, you know, whatever medication... So, you know, we can do it in a way that we're still verifying that everything is there for the safety of the patient, but then we maintain the integrity of that sample. So yeah, that's definitely something we can do. So as far as, this is our standard process"
