• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

49 killed resisting government gun confiscation (1 Viewer)

You made some kind of odd objection to my reference to sheriffs.

See if you can figure it out. So far, nothing.


That is incorrect. There is nothing preventing a private militia from swearing such an oath. And there is nothing preventing a private militia from serving the federal government.
I never said that they can't try to swear an oath. I said that they don't, and should they wish to, for most of these groups, there's problems that would prevent most states from granting them their wishes.

That is incorrect. They are American citizens.

I never said that they aren't citizens, that is entirely on you.
I said that their behavior and conduct against other Americans makes them enemy combatants.

Referring to American citizens as enemies sounds a bit like progressivism.

Nope, more like self defense.
Try showing up my house wearing crap like this and find out how "progressive" I am.
It's already evident that the kinds of people you think of as citizens have zero use for you except as a cheerleader.
Proud Boys 6MWE.png

In reality it is progressives who are America's enemies.

Again, if that's what you think, maybe you should prepare.
January 6th isn't far away, are you going to be there or are you going to hide behind your keyboard?
I'm betting the latter.

I have no knowledge of what people in these groups swear an oath to. Do you have any evidence of this?

That's right, you don't but I do.

Such personal attacks are used as a filler when people are unhappy with the facts that I present but have no way of arguing against those facts.

I'm so sorry that you are unable to take correction and receive a better education that wasn't sponsored by enemies of democracy.
But not sorry enough to retract anything I said. It's more interesting to watch you flail while defending people like this.
 
See if you can figure it out. So far, nothing.
I'll pass on that.

If you want to make a point, I'll read it and respond to it.

If you choose to not make a point, I'll move on and find a thread where an actual conversation is occurring.


I never said that they can't try to swear an oath. I said that they don't,
You said it, but you certainly are not presenting any kind of compelling case to that effect.

You also have not presented any kind of case that it even matters whether or not they have sworn such an oath.


and should they wish to, for most of these groups, there's problems that would prevent most states from granting them their wishes.
So you say. You certainly haven't presented a very compelling case.


I never said that they aren't citizens, that is entirely on you.
Sure you did. There is a big difference between a citizen and an enemy combatant.


I said that their behavior and conduct against other Americans makes them enemy combatants.
You've not presented any evidence of behavior and conduct against other citizens.

And no, such behavior, even if true, would not make them enemy combatants.

It would make them criminals though, if their behavior violates criminal laws.


Nope, more like self defense.
No. Treating American citizens like military enemies is like progressivism and fascism.


Again, if that's what you think, maybe you should prepare.
Prepare?


January 6th isn't far away, are you going to be there or are you going to hide behind your keyboard?
I'm betting the latter.
I have no idea what location you are talking about. The answer will very likely be "neither" though.


That's right, you don't but I do.
If you do have any such evidence, you forgot to present it.


I'm so sorry that you are unable to take correction
You are not offering any correction. All you have done is made a bunch of claims and failed to back them up, failed to explain how they would be relevant even if true, and in the case of those weird comments about sheriffs, failed to explain what they even mean.


and receive a better education that wasn't sponsored by enemies of democracy.
My education is just fine. That's why no one can ever point out any errors in my posts.


But not sorry enough to retract anything I said. It's more interesting to watch you flail while defending people like this.
I haven't been defending anyone. Neither have I been flailing. I started out posting a few facts. After that it has mostly been just asking you to justify and/or explain all these strange claims that you are posting.
 
249 years ago today. April 19, 1775.

The true birth date of the roots of the Second Amendment was at Lexington and Concord.

The events of that day have been immortalized, romanticized, analyzed and occasionally criticized, and from it all emerges one indisputable conclusion. Had it not been for the attempt to disarm those “embattled farmers” and their determination to not be disarmed, there might not be a “United States,” and there most assuredly would not be a Second Amendment right of the people to keep and bear arms that “shall not be infringed.”

For some reason the US military had a issue with Vietnamese and Afghans carrying guns too...
 
I'd say that if the US military is turned against the people you'd better pray that you're wrong.
With drones.. Satellites.. 20+ intelligence agencies.. The 'people' wouldnt stand a chance against our current military..
 
With drones.. Satellites.. 20+ intelligence agencies.. The 'people' wouldnt stand a chance against our current military..
I kind of get a kick out of how you guys that are so opposed to killing "innocent civilians" in Gaza are all gung ho about using the US military against Americans right here on American soil.
 
Actually, it's not. The militia is, was and always will be a hedge against a military takeover of the nation.
Good luck with that. If we are very so far gone that the military is coming for your guns, you will have no chance of succeeding.
 
I kind of get a kick out of how you guys that are so opposed to killing "innocent civilians" in Gaza are all gung ho about using the US military against Americans right here on American soil.

It's a question of threat.
 
I kind of get a kick out of how you guys that are so opposed to killing "innocent civilians" in Gaza are all gung ho about using the US military against Americans right here on American soil.

Who is that ?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom