• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

28 year-old Democrat Kat Abughazaleh running for Congress against an incumbent wants Democrats to fight back (1 Viewer)

j brown's body

"A Soros-backed animal"
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
73,088
Reaction score
75,683
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
"Abughazaleh, a video journalist known for her takedowns of right-wing media figures, started her campaign for Illinois’s Ninth District with the goal of unseating the long-standing incumbent, Jan Schakowsky, who has served since 1999, the year that 26-year-old Abughazaleh was born. In just one week as a candidate, she raised more money for the race, over $378,000, than Schakowsky did in the entire 90-day quarter. And on Wednesday, reports surfaced that 80-year-old Schakowsky would announce her retirement on May 5. Abughazaleh sent out a press release thanking Schakowsky for her service and encouraging others to jump into the race. The entry of Abughazaleh has coincided with a debate about Washington gerontocracy and whether younger automatically means better in politics.

Now, as she runs for office, the crisis of the moment is the threat of authoritarianism and fascism under Trump’s second term. And Abughazaleh has lost all confidence in traditional Democratic leadership to handle it. “I’ve seen Democratic missteps over and over again in my career, and they’re not good at navigating this modern landscape. It’s always reacting to the far right,” she said.... I asked Abughazaleh what she thinks Democrats should be doing, and her answer was that our leaders need to be louder, angrier, and more difficult, instead of being stuck in old rules and norms of politeness. “They, at the very least, need to be loudly, publicly using their positions of power to resist this. I mean, any legislative or parliamentary procedure they can use to gum up the works is important,” she said. “You need to be holding your colleagues accountable.


"I think that there’s a lot of potential in just, like, talking to people like human beings.” Talking to people like human beings is part of what has made her video explainers so popular online. After the Nazi march in Charlottesville, Abughazaleh made a video breaking down Trump’s comments. She unpacked his response neutrally, minute by minute, with some jokes thrown in. She told viewers they could be mean to her as long as they watched the video all the way through. The comments were telling: “Some of them were like: ‘I still like him, but what he said was screwed up.’ And then some were like: ‘This kind of punctured this view I had. And so I’m gonna do more reading,’” Abughazaleh recounted. “When you talk to people like that, when you recognize their concerns, and when you talk about things on a personal level, it resonates a lot more than just constant demonization.”"

Link

Definitely reading for some younger voices cooing out of the Democratic Party.
 
Keeping blue seats blue is easier (and less important) than making red seats blue.
 
One thing I’ve noticed about these “young” Democrats is they don’t comprehend that being elected means they now have the responsibility to legislate solutions and screaming at people from the side of the road isn’t good enough anymore. None of them have so far successfully transitioned from street activists to legislators.
 
"Abughazaleh, a video journalist known for her takedowns of right-wing media figures, started her campaign for Illinois’s Ninth District with the goal of unseating the long-standing incumbent, Jan Schakowsky, who has served since 1999, the year that 26-year-old Abughazaleh was born. In just one week as a candidate, she raised more money for the race, over $378,000, than Schakowsky did in the entire 90-day quarter. And on Wednesday, reports surfaced that 80-year-old Schakowsky would announce her retirement on May 5. Abughazaleh sent out a press release thanking Schakowsky for her service and encouraging others to jump into the race. The entry of Abughazaleh has coincided with a debate about Washington gerontocracy and whether younger automatically means better in politics.

Now, as she runs for office, the crisis of the moment is the threat of authoritarianism and fascism under Trump’s second term. And Abughazaleh has lost all confidence in traditional Democratic leadership to handle it. “I’ve seen Democratic missteps over and over again in my career, and they’re not good at navigating this modern landscape. It’s always reacting to the far right,” she said.... I asked Abughazaleh what she thinks Democrats should be doing, and her answer was that our leaders need to be louder, angrier, and more difficult, instead of being stuck in old rules and norms of politeness. “They, at the very least, need to be loudly, publicly using their positions of power to resist this. I mean, any legislative or parliamentary procedure they can use to gum up the works is important,” she said. “You need to be holding your colleagues accountable.


"I think that there’s a lot of potential in just, like, talking to people like human beings.” Talking to people like human beings is part of what has made her video explainers so popular online. After the Nazi march in Charlottesville, Abughazaleh made a video breaking down Trump’s comments. She unpacked his response neutrally, minute by minute, with some jokes thrown in. She told viewers they could be mean to her as long as they watched the video all the way through. The comments were telling: “Some of them were like: ‘I still like him, but what he said was screwed up.’ And then some were like: ‘This kind of punctured this view I had. And so I’m gonna do more reading,’” Abughazaleh recounted. “When you talk to people like that, when you recognize their concerns, and when you talk about things on a personal level, it resonates a lot more than just constant demonization.”"

Link

Definitely reading for some younger voices cooing out of the Democratic Party.
Sounds like more of the same we have been seeing from the left. Same policies but by a few new faces. Their problem is the policies, and they don't get that.
 
One thing I’ve noticed about these “young” Democrats is they don’t comprehend that being elected means they now have the responsibility to legislate solutions and screaming at people from the side of the road isn’t good enough anymore. None of them have so far successfully transitioned from street activists to legislators.
It's a good point. But this one is not elected yet.
 
So she made a name for herself taking down right wing figures, then complains that democrats spend too much time reacting….
 
"Abughazaleh, a video journalist known for her takedowns of right-wing media figures, started her campaign for Illinois’s Ninth District with the goal of unseating the long-standing incumbent, Jan Schakowsky, who has served since 1999, the year that 26-year-old Abughazaleh was born. In just one week as a candidate, she raised more money for the race, over $378,000, than Schakowsky did in the entire 90-day quarter. And on Wednesday, reports surfaced that 80-year-old Schakowsky would announce her retirement on May 5. Abughazaleh sent out a press release thanking Schakowsky for her service and encouraging others to jump into the race. The entry of Abughazaleh has coincided with a debate about Washington gerontocracy and whether younger automatically means better in politics.

Now, as she runs for office, the crisis of the moment is the threat of authoritarianism and fascism under Trump’s second term. And Abughazaleh has lost all confidence in traditional Democratic leadership to handle it. “I’ve seen Democratic missteps over and over again in my career, and they’re not good at navigating this modern landscape. It’s always reacting to the far right,” she said.... I asked Abughazaleh what she thinks Democrats should be doing, and her answer was that our leaders need to be louder, angrier, and more difficult, instead of being stuck in old rules and norms of politeness. “They, at the very least, need to be loudly, publicly using their positions of power to resist this. I mean, any legislative or parliamentary procedure they can use to gum up the works is important,” she said. “You need to be holding your colleagues accountable.


"I think that there’s a lot of potential in just, like, talking to people like human beings.” Talking to people like human beings is part of what has made her video explainers so popular online. After the Nazi march in Charlottesville, Abughazaleh made a video breaking down Trump’s comments. She unpacked his response neutrally, minute by minute, with some jokes thrown in. She told viewers they could be mean to her as long as they watched the video all the way through. The comments were telling: “Some of them were like: ‘I still like him, but what he said was screwed up.’ And then some were like: ‘This kind of punctured this view I had. And so I’m gonna do more reading,’” Abughazaleh recounted. “When you talk to people like that, when you recognize their concerns, and when you talk about things on a personal level, it resonates a lot more than just constant demonization.”"

Link

Definitely reading for some younger voices cooing out of the Democratic Party.


Or, it's a coming 'reign of terror' against old line established Democrats...
 
Sounds like more of the same we have been seeing from the left. Same policies but by a few new faces. Their problem is the policies, and they don't get that.
Basically this argument is essentially that the left should turn into the right if they want to get right wing voters.

That's not going to happen.

Right wing voters are extremists motivated by wedge issues propagated by big money. The left is never falling for that kind of disinformation because the left actually gives the well vetted main stream real news viewership. Right wing extremists have their own information sources and refuse to acknowledge reality.
 
One thing I’ve noticed about these “young” Democrats is they don’t comprehend that being elected means they now have the responsibility to legislate solutions and screaming at people from the side of the road isn’t good enough anymore. None of them have so far successfully transitioned from street activists to legislators.
Stop the absurdity. Thanks
 
Sounds like more of the same we have been seeing from the left. Same policies but by a few new faces. Their problem is the policies, and they don't get that.
Their problem is more in the messaging.
AS far as policies, immigration and Trans rights killed them, that is about it.

But the GOP masterfully exploited these issues.
 
It's a good point. But this one is not elected yet.
Thanks. And sure, but what she’s saying implies to me she wouldn’t be any different. Go out into the world and be loud? That’s all well and good if you’re a Joe Nobody street activist but once you’re elected your job is to go to your office and put pen to paper on a piece of legislation not run the streets being loud. I’m not convinced that she’ll be any different than her squad comrades in Congress. Long on mouth, short on ears and solutions.
 
Basically this argument is essentially that the left should turn into the right if they want to get right wing voters.

That's not going to happen.

Right wing voters are extremists motivated by wedge issues propagated by big money. The left is never falling for that kind of disinformation because the left actually gives the well vetted main stream real news viewership. Right wing extremists have their own information sources and refuse to acknowledge reality.

It seems that the cost of living is generally higher in blue states than in red states.

 
Donald claimed in the video that the people protesting the taking down of the statue of Robert E Lee were doing so "very quietly." 26:57.

No.

I'm sorry.

That is a lie.

Marching in the streets and chanting "blood and soil" is not "protesting very quietly.
 
Donald claimed in the video that the decision to remove a statue of Robert E Lee should be up to the local government.

Hello!

The local government decided to take down the statue!

So the neo-nazis who came to protest were not supporting that. They were not "very fine people."
 
Donald was asked how we are going to overcome racism in our country and he said jobs will do that.

He went on and on about the supposed build-up of jobs under his administration. He kept trying to turn the press conference into that. Several times he was asked how we are going to deal with racism and every time his answer was jobs.

That was 8 years ago. He had 4 of those years as president. Sure. Some jobs were created during that time. Did that reduce racism in America?

No!

Donald was wrong.

Jobs are not going to reduce racism.

That was a stupid, stupid answer.

How are jobs supposed to reduce racism? They won't. And they certainly won't now that they have initiated a war on DEI hiring. Getting rid of DEI hiring will actually make racism worse because white racist employers will favor white labor and blacks will be shut out of success and shut out of equality.

And that's exactly what racists want.
 
Donald claimed that more jobs were going to "have a tremendous impact on race relations" because there were going to be more jobs and wages were going to go up, and "people were going to be making more money then they ever thought possible," so somehow that was going to reduce racism. How, he didn't really explain.

Now we see that Donald was wrong about that.

It is as difficult as it ever was to get by on working wages, and race relations have not improved at all.

Fighting against CRT and DEI has not bee a good luck for the right. It makes people thin the right are a bunch of racists.
 
Donald was asked how we are going to overcome racism in our country and he said jobs will do that.

He went on and on about the supposed build-up of jobs under his administration. He kept trying to turn the press conference into that. Several times he was asked how we are going to deal with racism and every time his answer was jobs.

That was 8 years ago. He had 4 of those years as president. Sure. Some jobs were created during that time. Did that reduce racism in America?

No!

Donald was wrong.

Jobs are not going to reduce racism.

That was a stupid, stupid answer.

How are jobs supposed to reduce racism? They won't. And they certainly won't now that they have initiated a war on DEI hiring. Getting rid of DEI hiring will actually make racism worse because white racist employers will favor white labor and blacks will be shut out of success and shut out of equality.

And that's exactly what racists want.

It's against the law to discriminate based upon race.
 
It's against the law to discriminate based upon race.
But it's okay to discriminate against Whites and Asians; then it's called "affirmative action", "social justice," "diversity, equity, and inclusion," or some other bullshit Orwellian term.

Mark
 
I think we'd be better off if all the Boomers in congress were kidnapped and replaced by millennial and Gen Z of the same party. There's things I don't like about AOC, Josh Hawley, and Matt Gaetz but I'd gladly let them replace people in congress like Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell.
 
One thing I’ve noticed about these “young” Democrats is they don’t comprehend that being elected means they now have the responsibility to legislate solutions and screaming at people from the side of the road isn’t good enough anymore. None of them have so far successfully transitioned from street activists to legislators.
Kind of like Donnie Boy, no? He's just busy chucking out EOs.
:)
 
It's against the law to discriminate based upon race.
So black people who are shut out of success because of racism are just screwed, then.

Doing anything to create more opportunity for black people goes against what racists want, which is to suppress black success.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom