Global warming could be classed as a scientific law, but becomes a scientific theory once you attach "antropogenic" to it. A scientific law is a observed phenomena. Once you start trying to explain it, it is a scientific theory.
I see you don't read the peer reviewed papers like most our resident warmers don't. Very, very few scientists write any papers I disagree with. At least with the language they use. Their papers however, can be interpreted differently because they are generally ambiguous.
There is only one, maybe two deniers in these threads. Your logical fallacy of claiming we see conspiracy where we see group-think is more ignorance on your part.
Good.
And your shoes filling up with water to help keep the floor dry!
Don't blame you! Nothing like driven rain visibility in car with no top!
Oh, it HAD to be wax covered! :doh Nothing like trying to wax the inside of your windshield in the pouring rain with a used rag!
I bet! People probably thought you were just a couple of idiots driving around with no top. They don't understand about the car show of course!
Every time you look at that trophy!
Interesting. Scientists use 3 different methods, and they track each other fairly well.
I thank you for your service, sir. It takes a special kind of pilot to land a Phantom on a pitching carrier at sea!
It's called a Celerity. Is it a high speed cruiser (cruise 200mph) using a wood and moldless fiberglass structure. It's a low wing bird, when electrohydraulic retractable landing gear. A scratch built aircraft.
I currently hold a private instrument w/ tailwheel, weightshift, complex, and high power endorsements. I own a Cessna 150F, which I have outfitted with instrument landing capability. I also hold a A&P mechanics license. I currently have about 1200 hours in aircraft, and 0.5 hours in type 737. I fly fairly regularly, keeping current. I am now in the process of installing ADS-B to both aircraft. I also own a trike, currently undergoing a gear conversion from amphibious to land only, and rebuilding the fuel system on it. I've flown my Cessna as far as Boulder, CO. (based in Seattle area). Flew it to Copperstate in Arizona once. Won an award for that little Cessna there.
Void argument fallacy. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth or to calculate it.
Mathematics is not an axiom. It is a closed functional system.
Only if you want to claim random numbers as 'data'.
That's how greenhouses work. They reduce heat. They allow a similar amount of radiant heat from sunshine as outside the greenhouse, but they reduce convective heat.
That is what I said.
They do every hear.
Why not?
Some can, some can't. Compositional error fallacy.False equivalence fallacy. Latitude is not the season. Some plants and animals from temperate or even polar environments can adapt to equatorial environments, some can't. Those in temperate environments do undergo seasonal changes of temperatures that wide every single year.
Global Warming is not a theory of science or a law. It is a religion. If you feel it's a law, state the equation here and now.
The Theory of Evolution is not a theory of science. It is not falsifiable. Science has no theories about past unobserved events. They are not falsifiable.
All laws of of science are based on a theory of science. A law of science is nothing more than a theory of science formalized into a closed functional system.
Science isn't 'facts'. A 'fact' is not a Universal Truth. Learn what a 'fact' means. Science isn't credentials, licenses, certifications, etc. No university, government agency, scientist, or group of scientists, own science. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Theories are explanatory arguments.
Define 'global warming'. This is a meaningless buzzword that an entire religion has formed around.
Define 'climate change'. Another meaningless buzzword. Neither of these two phrase can be defined as anything but themselves.
Denial of history fallacy (revisionism). Inversion fallacy. More and more people are recognizing that the Church of Global Warming is a fundamentalist style religion.
Did you know conspiracies actually exist? Those trying to implement socialism is one of them.
It is YOU that is abandoning science. The 'greenhouse' effect ignores and denies the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth.
The 'greenhouse' effect argument also produces an indirect paradox. Arguing both sides of a paradox is irrationality.
Inversion fallacy.
What discomfort? YOU are the ones trying to turn everything upside down to 'solve' a 'problem' that doesn't need solving!
That's going to be a memorable show for you for quite awhile!
Yeah. funny thing is, the water does run down on your knee, the dip between the fender and the hood acts like a rain spout.
The windshield is not very high. Rain drops hitting you in the eyes kinda stings for a moment.
I use a waterless car wash/wax on it when I get to car shows, the stuff really makes it shine. The rag I used was the only one I had up front.
Yeah, they had that "you guys are idiots" look on their faces.
Memorable for sure. We laugh about it often. When someone asks who in their right mind would spend $40 on gas and drive an
hour in the pouring rain in a race car with no top for a $20 trophy, I can smile and say...Yup, I did that