• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

2 Atheists Confronted with Truth...2 Different Outcomes...

They're not buying the lies of the revisionist Christ-deniers.



<yawn>

You don't believe hard-core atheists when they accept the historical evidences for Jesus Christ. Now they're Christians and suddenly liars, right?

In your sadly normal manner, you do a personal attack while ignoring my questions.

Once again
It is your opinion then, that one of the earliest patriarchs of the Christian faith (Justin Martyr) didn't understand the relationship between his faith/beliefs and those held by the ones who worshipped older gods?
 
Tell you what. You talk a big game but I'm going to challenge you.

How about you show me your BEST ONE EXAMPLE ( 1 - JUST ONE) of a fictitious person, place, or event in the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John). PERSON, PLACE OR EVENT. Cite the pertinent scripture(s) and make your case with some kind of evidence or substantiation why it's fictitious. Please follow the instructions above. Let's see that bad boy.

If you can't, then you have nothing.

As I have repeatedly brought up: the supposed "tradition" of releasing a prisoner to the acclaim of a crown on Passover. It is never once mentioned prior to the Gospels and the Jews deny it was ever a tradition.
 
Simon Greenleaf (1783-1853), esteemed Harvard law professor, admitted he didn't believe in Christ's resurrection.

"Have you considered the evidence?" a student challenged.

Greenleaf taught his students to study all evidence before making conclusions, so he undertook an honest study of Christ's resurrection, found the evidence compelling, and became a Christian.

Dr. Francis Crick (1916-2004) won the Nobel Prize for discovering DNA.

He admitted DNA couldn't have come about by chance and said the origin of life was "almost a miracle." However, Crick mocked Christianity the remainder of his life.

The Bible tells us that people "suppress the truth ... because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse." Romans 1:18-20.
https://biblelovenotes.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-honest-see.html
Ah, the simon Greenleaf myth. That story is 100% nonsense.


As for Francis Crick, what you are doing is 'quote mining' about the origin of DNA. That's dishonest.
 
It is your opinion then, that one of the earliest patriarchs of the Christian faith (Justin Martyr) didn't understand the relationship between his faith/beliefs and those held by the ones who worshipped older gods?

I couldn't care less about his views on that.

The Bible / New Testament is the proper source on faith and beliefs.
 
I couldn't care less about his views on that.

The Bible / New Testament is the proper source on faith and beliefs.
The idea that god would present us his son some 2000 years ago in some obscure corner of the world is laughable.

With the millions of galaxies in the universe and with the trillions and billions of suns and planets it happened here some 2000 years ago ..in some goat herding shithole, right
 
The idea that god would present us his son some 2000 years ago in some obscure corner of the world is laughable.

Some 1 billion Christian adherents don't agree with you.

With the millions of galaxies in the universe and with the trillions and billions of suns and planets it happened here some 2000 years ago ..in some goat herding shithole, right

Show me evidence of intelligent life on another planet? If you can't then this is where it is.

By the way, I see you RAN from my challenge (" show me your BEST ONE EXAMPLE ( 1 - JUST ONE) of a fictitious person, place, or event in the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John). PERSON, PLACE OR EVENT. Cite the pertinent scripture(s) and make your case with some kind of evidence or substantiation why it's fictitious. Please follow the instructions above. Let's see that bad boy."

Looks like you're 0-1. <football spike>
 
some 2000 years ago in some obscure corner of the world is laughable.
What's laughable is someone who thinks the eastern part of the world was not the center of the hustle and bustle of the world at that time...pssst...Merica wasn't always the be all and end all...😊
 
Back
Top Bottom